Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,211
It reads like a trigger warning for LGBTQIA+ people lmao, I’m gonna assume that was not the intention because uhwhats is the logic for this alert lmao
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It reads like a trigger warning for LGBTQIA+ people lmao, I’m gonna assume that was not the intention because uhwhats is the logic for this alert lmao
It might be relevant for our purposes since some characters have supernatural abilities that differentiate in effect based on biological sex and some characters that likely change their in-character behaviour based on it (if they have knowledge on it).Why exactly do we need to mention the gender assigned at birth? She’s a girl, there’s not really any greater intricacies to that fact, nor is her assigned at birth gender accurate to her gender
It's a warning to tell you that I am coming, and you should all be afraid.whats is the logic for this alert lmao
I can get the former, but I doubt there’s any more than an extremely small handful of characters, if any on the wiki that possess the traits of both being trans and having a power that works specifically on biological sex, and even then just put a note explaining why you are using whatever version of the power at the bottom of the page, the gender section isn’t the place to make those kind of clarificationsIt might be relevant for our purposes since some characters have supernatural abilities that differentiate in effect based on biological sex and some characters that likely change their in-character behaviour based on it (if they have knowledge on it).
These both seem specific situations which between them can probably not have any more than 10 characters on the whole wiki which apply to them, and Bridget is not part of that group afaik. I cannot think of any situation where listing the assigned at birth gender is relevant to the listing of their current gender, and even delving into extremely specific circumstances better options present themselvesI can get the former, but I doubt there’s any more than an extremely small handful of characters, if any on the wiki that possess the traits of both being trans and having a power that works specifically on biological sex, and even then just put a note explaining why you are using whatever version of the power at the bottom of the page, the gender section isn’t the place to make those kind of clarifications
for the second, just... list the appropriate/current behaviours? If they have different keys for different time periods which themselves have different genders, just split standard tactics into keys
Oh, it's not necessarily that they themselves have such powers. To give an example: The Unexplored Summon has an ability which mind controls only women (and I strongly assume that it targets based on biology). You see how it might get confusing when the page just says female.I can get the former, but I doubt there’s any more than an extremely small handful of characters, if any on the wiki that possess the traits of both being trans and having a power that works specifically on biological sex, and even then just put a note explaining why you are using whatever version of the power at the bottom of the page, the gender section isn’t the place to make those kind of clarifications
Then just explain it in the match, its not like her being trans isn’t already present on her profile, it ends with “her true identity as a woman” after discussing how her entire early backstory revolves around the fact she was AMABI think he means the trans person's opponent may have a power that selectively works according to biological sex
I guess explaining it is an option as well. Although I personally don't see the harm in just listing both either. But you do you.Then just explain it in the match, its not like her being trans isn’t already present on her profile, it ends with “her true identity as a woman” after discussing how her entire early backstory revolves around the fact she was AMAB
I made a similar argument a while ago. The conclusion was that these abilities are too few and far between to warrant the standard always being announcing someone's transnessOh, it's not necessarily that they themselves have such powers. To give an example: The Unexplored Summon has an ability which mind controls only women (and I strongly assume that it targets based on biology). You see how it might get confusing when the page just says female.
My point was both that explaining this was easier, AND that it is already made apparent in her description she’s trans, so a very basic read of her profile would answer any questions about abilities that only work on the basis of assigned at birth gender/biological sexI guess explaining it is an option as well. Although I personally don't see the harm in just listing both either. But you do you.
i agree with this, just put her transition as part of her backstoryMy point was both that explaining this was easier, AND that it is already made apparent in her description she’s trans, so a very basic read of her profile would answer any questions about abilities that only work on the basis of assigned at birth gender/biological sex
Exactly because we are an indexing wiki we have to uphold accuracy, “Male” has no place anywhere near a statement about Bridget’s gender. She’s a woman and we should list her as suchAs we are indexing wiki, indexing everything is our task. "Female, formerly Male" should be a way to go. And obviously it should be included in Gender section, just like we always do.
could you imagine if under “Name” we had (Name, [Insert Deadname] prior to whatever game) for a similar case? Mentioning previous assigned or identified genders isn’t accurate to the current status of the character, and dilutes the significance of their actual gender and respecting it.
Listen, I am not Guilty Gear expert, but from wiki standpoint it makes no sense. The character doesn't have multiple keys to make it Male | Female like we would usually do with others (like when person becomes some cosmic thingy it goes Female | Inaplicable), so we have to do it in one line, simple as that.Exactly because we are an indexing wiki we have to uphold accuracy, “Male” has no place anywhere near a statement about Bridget’s gender. She’s a woman and we should list her as such
The gender assigned at birth is totally irrelevant to the question of what her gender is, she’s a woman, not a “woman but...”Listen, I am not Guilty Gear expert, but from wiki standpoint it makes no sense. The character doesn't have multiple keys to make it Male | Female like we would usually do with others (like when person becomes some cosmic thingy it goes Female | Inaplicable), so we have to do it in one line, simple as that
I think I've gotten a couple of neato examples of trans characters that are just listed under their identity
Madeline
Birdo
Loki (MCU)
Lily Hoshikawa
so yeah I think using the gender she identifies as much like all of these examples I've listed would be ideal so just female. womannn. etc uvu
So Female, got it.The character doesn't have multiple keys to make it Male | Female like we would usually do with others (like when person becomes some cosmic thingy it goes Female | Inaplicable), so we have to do it in one line, simple as that.
Couldn't care less about other profiles, I am commenting under this one.The gender assigned at birth is totally irrelevant to the question of what her gender is, she’s a woman, not a “woman but...”
Other profiles don’t follow your logic
It is complete and in no way inaccurate info. Her gender is female. Done and dusted, that is the full statementThis is just inaccurate info. Like here with gender. Or non-full info to be exact.
Is the profile for the character who appeared before Strive or just for Strive specific?It is complete and in no way inaccurate info. Her gender is female. Done and dusted, that is the full statement
I have nothing to do with Guilty Gear, but I can be fairly certain it encompasses all of her appearances in the franchiseIs the profile for the character who appeared before Strive or just for Strive specific?
Than we have to include the info of her being Male in previous games, since the change happend only after Strive (or in Strive, don't know).I have nothing to do with Guilty Gear, but I can be fairly certain it encompasses all of her appearances in the franchise
Its not like we randomly throw out info of character's items, for example, just because they never used it again. Injustice Batman's super pills, for example.Obsessing over a trans character's assigned gender and presenting it as an inseparable thing that has to be pointed out is I will just say, awful.
Being an indexing wiki does not mean we have to be so technical about someone 's gender identity.
Injustice Batman's super pills are not a real world issue that many people have bigoted views on.Its not like we randomly throw out info of character's items, for example, just because they never used it again. Injustice Batman's super pills, for example.
Respecting is one thing. We are indexing wiki. We are indexing fictional characters. We are listing accurate information. What do you find so wrong and offensive in "Female, previously Male"?
Option 1. I personally don't see Gender would matter in versus matches. Ya indexing is fine, but mostly, it does not need all those posts for a simple change.As far as I'm concerned, there are two options:
1. List the gender as just Female.
2. Note how their gender changed, but do it in a more respectful manner. 'Transgender Female' is just as accurate and far more tasteful than 'Female, previously Male', which as Andytrenom pointed out, is kind of offensive in and of itself.
(I am cisgender though I have done some searching in regards to my identity so take what I say with a grain of salt, it's just what I've gathered)I don't see how it's offensive, and I guess no one will tell me. Fine.
So option 1. I don't see any other point.The idea is that being trans is something you are born with. Internally a girl with a male body or vice versa. It's not a switch, you were always that gender you just didn't present that way before
Female, formerly male just has really bad implications