- 13,225
- 21,036
- Thread starter
- #41
Le bump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need to context that ehhh...free from shackle of time (is that the statement??), or unbound by the concept of time, etc......are refering to their physical movement, speedWhat kind of elaboration would even be needed? Feels like Immeasurable speed standards are all over the place sometimes
I would recommend applying the non-Immeasurable speed parts and leaving the discussion on Immeasurable speed for later. At least, if you are up to it.Mental health sucks so I can't do much rn but I at least wanna bump this thread so it doesn't risk falling into obscurity
I wouldn't mind that either, though I'm not necessarily in a position to freely apply stuff, unfortunately (I've been away from my PC for the past week because of what's been going on)I would recommend applying the non-Immeasurable speed parts and leaving the discussion on Immeasurable speed for later. At least, if you are up to it.
There's more than substantial enough agreement for everything else, and it seems unlikely a clear consensus will be reached on Immeasurable speed at present without more detailed analyses of past precedents.
That speed rating makes sense, at least until you're in a position to work on the Immeasurable speed aspect.I wouldn't mind that either, though I'm not necessarily in a position to freely apply stuff, unfortunately (I've been away from my PC for the past week because of what's been going on)
Should Merged I-No be downgraded to "At least Relativistic+, likely far higher" as a result as well? Scaling far above her previous form, since Immeasurable doesn't have a clear consensus
I'm not available to do so at this moment, but I could apply the contents of the blog for you later if you would be content with that.I wouldn't mind that either, though I'm not necessarily in a position to freely apply stuff, unfortunately (I've been away from my PC for the past week because of what's been going on)
I'd be willing to approve that, and I think changing a "likely higher" speed rating to "likely far higher" for this justification would fall under a minor content revision as per our rules. So that should be fine.Should Merged I-No be downgraded to "At least Relativistic+, likely far higher" as a result as well? Scaling far above her previous form, since Immeasurable doesn't have a clear consensus
I would be, yeah. Thanks!I'm not available to do so at this moment, but I could apply the contents of the blog for you later if you would be content with that.
I'd be willing to approve that, and I think changing a "likely higher" speed rating to "likely far higher" for this justification would fall under a minor content revision as per our rules. So that should be fine.
Appreciate it a lot!That speed rating makes sense, at least until you're in a position to work on the Immeasurable speed aspect.
No, not yetHas this been applied?