- 8,438
- 3,293
This isn't about what we prefer, it is about what is right and logical.Therefir said:@Yobobojojo @Yobobojojo I honestly prefer that they be the strongest type of Low 2-C, instead of baseline 2-C with no hax.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This isn't about what we prefer, it is about what is right and logical.Therefir said:@Yobobojojo @Yobobojojo I honestly prefer that they be the strongest type of Low 2-C, instead of baseline 2-C with no hax.
^ThisAssaltwaffle said:This isn't about what we prefer, it is about what is right and logical.Therefir said:@Yobobojojo @Yobobojojo I honestly prefer that they be the strongest type of Low 2-C, instead of baseline 2-C with no hax.
Unfortunately I'd have to disagree, and for way more reasons than what I have said here. Thinking on it I can go on and on about how the current 2-C standards are wonky; and I will in another thread later down the road.Therefir said:I don't know, Matthew's reasoning is more logical to me.