- 277
- 93
His tentacles are described as afterimage when a stone flies near the speed of light.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact that you saw a stone flying at a speed close to the light means that the flow of time in the scene went that slow, and the readers looked at the events in the scene from that slow perspective. Yes, it's described as a afterimage even though it's seen through a very slow time flow.Yeah, I'm not sure what exactly this is trying to upgrade
I'm not saying his tentacles are equal to the speed of light.There is no set speed to create an after-image. This is just letting use know he's moving his tentacles fast, it doesn't mean he's moving them faster than the stones that are moving near light speed.
No. Massively hypersonic possibly higher, is appropriate. It's hard to quantify, and because the stone is completely invisible, you can think of it as a complete afterimage.His tentacles are Relativistic+ tho?
No, I'm not talking about attack speed. I'm talking about basic speed.I'm not a calc member. But if you have a problem with relativistic+ you should probably make a new calc on why it doesn't work or consult a calc member about it. There's nothing saying relativistic+ is the upper limit.
There's no way to quantify the afterimage, right? We can only assume that even though we have seen the events in the scene through a time-flow perspective that is slow enough to perceive the speed of light, it will be much faster than extremely hypersonic speeds, which are 80 times slower than the speed of light because he appears as an afterimage.You mean combat speed? It's better to get a calc out of that instead of assuming Massively hypersonic, possibly higher.
I don't know why you're assuming it's a motion line. There's no reason to divide the motion lines. The motion line is drawn in a way that connects the object that gives motion to the end of the line.I don't see any indication of an afterimage there. It's just motion lines.
No, it's definitely different I don't know why you're referring to it In the case of motion lines, the images are not divided into several, they are continuous or depicted as a single image. As I said, in the case of motion, there should be no break, so it is drawn in a state that extends from the shape to be moved to the end of the motion line. In addition, if it is a technique that simply divides and explains the motion process several times, there is no reason to draw the previous image roughly or blurry with the motion line. If it just stopped in the middle, there is no reason to express it as a blurry shape consisting of only motion lines. It is correct to express an afterimage that the previous one looks blurry even though it has already passed the position. Why would it be described in a way that expresses the movement in several phases?His tentacles are just being drawn to show motion, not an afterimage. This is like saying Garou created an afterimage when he went to scratch his hair at the end of his fight with Metal Bat.
^Again, it's better to ask for a calc of it instead of assuming that it's not calcable.
Yes I know.
I don't see any indication of an afterimage there. It's just motion lines.
^No, it's definitely different I don't know why you're referring to it In the case of motion lines, the images are not divided into several, they are continuous or depicted as a single image. As I said, in the case of motion, there should be no break, so it is drawn in a state that extends from the shape to be moved to the end of the motion line. In addition, if it is a technique that simply divides and explains the motion process several times, there is no reason to draw the previous image roughly or blurry with the motion line. If it just stopped in the middle, there is no reason to express it as a blurry shape consisting of only motion lines. It is correct to express an afterimage that the previous one looks blurry even though it has already passed the position. Why would it be described in a way that expresses the movement in several phases?
Reference
I am his friend, not his other account. The above is what we decided to discuss and propose through a chat.
Because he woke up too late, I remembered the account that I had forgotten which email I signed up for and logged in.
If you say that it's just another tentacle, then the first afterimage is not fully connected to the body and it's not triangular, so it's not the end of the otherI don't see any indication of an afterimage there. It's just motion lines.
Rather, this scene is a more identical example. Murata depicts through multiple afterimages that Genos sees Saitama as an afterimage and saitama is fast enough to appear as an afterimage.I don't see any indication of an afterimage there. It's just motion lines.
I don't know why you keep saying the same thing. There is an example of what I said in the image you posted. In the scene, the motion line is drawn through the background and connected through another shape and another motion line from the object that gives the movement. This is not the same case as the scene of the Geryu. The scene of the Geryu is separated from the shape of the line giving motion, and there are no motion lines in the background, so the images are 'fully' separated into three images.So, Metal Bat’s bat in this image isn’t drawn with motion lines, and it’s an afterimage, according to you?
Geryuganshoop’s tentacles are not afterimaging. They are just being drawn with motion lines to show that an action HAS taken place and we are seeing the end of that movement action. It would be an afterimage if we actually saw double of those tentacles, but we do not.
As you can see in the photo above, Murata's afterimage is blurred and the original image is clearly separated.So, Metal Bat’s bat in this image isn’t drawn with motion lines, and it’s an afterimage, according to you?
Geryuganshoop’s tentacles are not afterimaging. They are just being drawn with motion lines to show that an action HAS taken place and we are seeing the end of that movement action. It would be an afterimage if we actually saw double of those tentacles, but we do not.
The scene of geryu also appeared in multiple locations precisely through the blank. I don't know what the hell did you prove what, invisible? Geryu also translucent. Anyway, I don't need to claim this anymore, so I will stopConsidering we can literally see multiple Sonics standing in place in the exact position, something not present with Geryuganshoop, further proves that no afterimage is present in the Geryuganshoop scene. Thank you for proving my own argument.
Futhermore, Sonic is transparent, something not shared by Geryuganshoop’s tentacles. Further proving no afterimage is present.
Is that so? In fact, I decided not to stick to the position of the afterimage claim anymore. I admit that the evidence is too poor to prove that it is an afterimage. Even if it was a motion line, his tentacles were depicted at quite high speed because they had a long motion line in one scene.This is really lines of movement, but you can calculate that.
As I said, this is what I said aboveThen what even is the point of this thread anymore?