• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

General DC Comics Discussion Thread

The Overvoid =/= The Source?​

This is also the dumbest thing. In all the mention of the Overvoid (I’ve read all of it) outside interview, which the term “non-dual” was rarely ever coined. I, recall, the Overvoid being non-dual only in Morrison’s Green Latern run. Which he happened to also draw the Multiversity Map with the Source being outside everything, which he admits there's no difference between The Source and The Overvoid.

Then in Final Crisis: Secret Files, he explained that the Source “is not dual.” In his rough sketch of Multiversity, he said the Source is the white page outside all of Creation.

Last I recalled outside him, It was never stated The Overvoid was non-dual especially since Justice League: Incarnate which references the very same story of the Overvoid being described during Morrison's time. In Death Metal, even Ultima agreed that the Overvoid is nothing like Final Crisis, it isn't “consciousness nor ground of being” since beings existing in it and being created from its “rent” is impossible.

Not to mention the true void that is self-referential and eternal is the Darkness. We see this in New Gods, Absolute Green Lantern, Absolute Maratin Manhunter, Green Lantern: Dark. The list goes on.

Lastly, I also recall that The Greater Omniverse and The Overvoid were the same thing in Snyder's take of the Void that houses Creation. Last I also recalled they never retcon it being the realm of light before the Multiverse and came into being from the Darkness.
According to the blog you linked, there is no text regarding the Source and the Overvoid.

According to Morrison's Final Crisis run, the Overvoid is treated as non-dual. This is said again by Grant Morrison in The Green Lantern Vol 1 #1 after Death Metal.

Calling the Source non-dual was from Len Wein in Final Crisis: Secret Files Vol 1 #1.

In both the original debut of the Great Darkness in Swamp Thing and the recent Justice League Incarnate, the Great Darkness is a counterforce to the light/the source. They affect each other. Neither the Great Darkness nor the Source is considered non-Dual because of this. Yes, the Great Darkness came first, but the "Light" came from somewhere else.

In Green Lantern Dark Vol 1 #5, it's also stated that Darkness was kept in "balance" with the light.

In Dark Nights: Death Metal Rise of the New God #1 by James Tynion IV, "The Source" and in turn the Darkness exist within the Overvoid. They are all distinct entities.
 
According to Morrison's Final Crisis run, the Overvoid is treated as non-dual. This is said again by Grant Morrison in The Green Lantern Vol 1 #1 after Death Metal.
Yeah, Final Crisis information has been since an add-on. The only mention of “non-dual” was during that Green Lantern run, and we see in Justice League you don't “dissolve into pure unity in the Overvoid” since Creations exists within it as shown with the Chronciler statement.

If it follows non-dualism and/or Neo-Vedantic Impersonal Monad (DeMatteis’ God) then you would not exist in separation from something that is the ground of unity that resolves everything that is not within The Flaw.

Obviously, Grant intended it that way. Snyder adding that the Hands and Creations exist in that “space” contradicts the notion of non-dualism. Non-dualism is inherent in things that aren't “two.” We see this being an issue if the Overvoid is purely the ground of being where contradiction revolves, or else Overvoid should just be 0 and not High 1-A+ (In which it is neither).
Calling the Source non-dual was from Len Wein in Final Crisis: Secret Files Vol 1 #1.
Yeah, and that doesn't contradict Grant's intention of the Source and Overvoid being the same thing. Outside the plethora of interviews, it is literally shown in the Multiversity Map.
In both the original debut of the Great Darkness in Swamp Thing and the recent Justice League Incarnate, the Great Darkness is a counterforce to the light/the source. They affect each other. Neither the Great Darkness nor the Source is considered non-Dual because of this. Yes, the Great Darkness came first, but the "Light" came from somewhere else.
The Great Darkness as “total darkness” in Ram V's storyline is literally the inherent absence of light. In which, it finally exists when “opposition” began, but its stance against the “Light” is not grounds for it losing non-duality (Which should just be reversed for the Unknowable since that's not what non-dual means in the context of what Grant intended).
In Green Lantern Dark Vol 1 #5, it's also stated that Darkness was kept in "balance" with the light.
The Light also in Incarnate references the name of the Overvoid during Multiversity “immaculate perfection.” So, none of them is non-dual.
In Dark Nights: Death Metal Rise of the New God #1 by James Tynion IV, "The Source" and in turn the Darkness exist within the Overvoid. They are all distinct entities.
Where does it say that? The Darkness exists as an eternal nothingness outside the entirety of the Greater Omniverse (The Overvoid), it bounds the Source on all sides as stated in New Gods by Ram V, and is outside the Source entirely. No mention of the Overvoid being anywhere in that.
 
And here we immediately go with the relentless unreasonable arguments against staff verdicts, and in order to instigate maximum attention/controversy it is even done in the main discussion thread for the verse rather than a content revision. I suppose that we have to continue for 16+ pages and several months without you budging in the slightest regarding accepting staff verdicts, as usual. 🙏
 
Last edited:
Never mind. I suppose that I let my irritation and current general bad mood due to world politics get the better of me again. My apologies. 🙏
 
And here we immediately go with the relentless unreasonable arguments against staff verdicts, and in order to instigate maximum attention/controversy it is even done in the main discussion thread for the verse rather than a content revision. I suppose that we have to continue for 16+ pages and several months without you budging in the slightest regarding accepting staff verdicts, as usual. 🙏
Never mind. I suppose that I let my irritation and current general bad mood due to world politics get the better of me again. My apologies. 🙏
Just don't say anything. I've already mentioned this a while back to Ultima about how Overvoid isn't “non-dual” outside a Morrison-specific cosmology.
 
Yeah, Final Crisis information has been since an add-on. The only mention of “non-dual” was during that Green Lantern run.
I am just stating that Grant Morrison is consistent from Final Crisis to Death Metal with his view of the Overvoid being Non-Dual.
we see in Justice League you don't “dissolve into pure unity in the Overvoid” since Creations exists within it as shown with the Chronciler statement.

If it follows non-dualism and/or Neo-Vedantic Impersonal Monad (DeMatteis’ God) then you would not exist in separation from something that is the ground of unity that resolves everything that is not within The Flaw.

Obviously, Grant intended it that way. Snyder adding that the Hands and Creations exist in that “space” contradicts the notion of non-dualism. Non-dualism is inherent in things that aren't “two.” We see this being an issue if the Overvoid is purely the ground of being where contradiction revolves, or else Overvoid should just be 0 and not High 1-A+ (In which it is neither).
Yes, Snyder's view of the Overvoid is different than Morrison's. In Morrison's Overvoid, Mandrakk faded into the unity of the Overvoid. Whereas Snyder and James Tynion IV populated the Overvoid with the Super Celestials and the Source.
Yeah, and that doesn't contradict Grant's intention of the Source and Overvoid being the same thing. Outside the plethora of interviews, it is literally shown in the Multiversity Map.
At the time, he considered The Source and the Overvoid basically the same. However, he didn't consider the Source tied to The Presence/The Light that interacted with the Great Darkness.
The Great Darkness as “total darkness” in Ram V's storyline is literally the inherent absence of light. In which, it finally exists when “opposition” began, but its stance against the “Light” is not grounds for it losing non-duality (Which should just be reversed for the Unknowable since that's not what non-dual means in the context of what Grant intended).
To clarify, which Ram V comic are you referencing? Dark Crisis?
The Light also in Incarnate references the name of the Overvoid during Multiversity “immaculate perfection.” So, none of them is non-dual.
It would seem that Joshua Williamson and Dennis Culver are trying to equate the Light with the Overvoid.
Where does it say that? The Darkness exists as an eternal nothingness outside the entirety of the Greater Omniverse (The Overvoid), it bounds the Source on all sides as stated in New Gods by Ram V, and is outside the Source entirely. No mention of the Overvoid being anywhere in that.
In James Tynion IV's view, the Chronicler was an agent of The Source and arrived from the Overvoid.

I'm not dictating/proposing what is consistent across different writers or not. That's for a different thread. I'm just archiving what previous authors have said and what later authors have said.

Your original posting was asking if The Source = The Overvoid.

To Morrison, they were kinda the same.

To Snyder and James Tynion IV, they were separate.

To Joshua Williamson and Dennis Culver, they seem to be.

Tate Brombal is unclear depending on where the "light", "darkness," and creator came from.
 
Last edited:
Quite ironic that Deagon in the past already said in Multiversity the Overvoid (Immculate Perfection) was in a dualtisic relation with the Flaw.

A and not A (Overvoid - Nothing and The Flaw - Not Nothing)

A and B (Overvoid - The Nothing and The Flaw - The Everything)

However, we overlook this. Also, a Chinese philosopher once made a point about Dao. The Nameless Dao that can be named is not the Dao. Ram V used this notion:

Darkness is defined through the Light.

Total Darkness is defined as the absence of Light.

Therefore, The Darkness that can be referenced through the Light is not the “Total Darkness” (self-referential Void).
 
Last edited:
I am just stating that Grant Morrison is consistent from Final Crisis to Death Metal with his view of the Overvoid being Non-Dual.
How so? Grant Morrison pivots the Overvoid as the fictional representation of the canvas being the ground of existence, where all contradictions resolve into unity.

As Ultima describes it, everything in the Flaw exists in separation from The Overvoid due to the latter being the unification of things in The Flaw when they exit it as shown with Dax Novu's “idea” being erased despite this being later retconned as just falling into the Dark Multiverse. So, Ultima has Overvoid only as a Morrison specific as 0 due to the idea that it is based on Buddhism pure consciousness in which things don't exist when they enter it.

Said “things” is no longer applicable in the logic of Death Metal because we see the Chronciler come from said “space. Things were also mentioned by Ultima as Perpetua and her sons (Alepheus recalling himself made from the void) being a contradiction that High 1-A+ can not be piece, nor that some beings can exist in the same manner as using it to build Creation.

Non-dualism is 0 because it's a stricter form of Monism. Overvoid can't be 0 due to things being in it and can't be High 1-A+, if lesser beings can somehow take pieces of it like that to form something lesser than itself because the sons of Perpetua aren't strictly beings that can just actualize worlds (Type 1) in relation to the “supposed” space for all possible space (Type 2).

An illogical contradiction is being shown.
Yes, Snyder's view of the Overvoid is different than Morrison's. In Morrison's Overvoid, Mandrakk faded into the unity of the Overvoid. Whereas Snyder and James Tynion IV populated the Overvoid with the Super Celestials and the Source.
Yeah, that's precisely an issue as I showed above in which it neither completes 0 nor High 1-A properly.
At the time, he considered The Source and the Overvoid basically the same. However, he didn't consider the Source tied to The Presence/The Light that interacted with the Great Darkness.
No, Morrison wrote JSA about the Presence being an eternal hymn that had no beginning and end. Angels are a mere reflection of the Creator’s beauty eternally reflecting from the outside. He never pivots the Presence as any lower than the Source or the Overvoid. The Great Darknes sat and was indistinct because it’s an eternal nothingness preceding the Light of Creation (The action of the Presence which created the Immulate Perfection (Overvoid) of Light (The Source).

Kid Eternity shows the grace of the Creator in the most monotheistic manner, and not he scientific approach he took during Multiversity. Doom Patrol’s idea of the tower climbing so high into the ground of unification as a being without duality is just “God” in the apophatic sense, which is closer to the Presence than the Overvoid, which wasn't even coined by him until Final Crisis. The Creator who created The Light affirmed to be the Presence was already a concept by then, so he couldn't have been referencing the Overvoid unless he planned it decades in advance which is a generous length of time.
To clarify, which Ram V comic are you referencing? Dark Crisis?
New Gods.
It would seem that Joshua Williamson and Dennis Culver are trying to equate the Light with the Overvoid.
Yeah, they referenced Multiversity about the Overvoid response to the Flaw which was caused by The Darkness.
In James Tynion IV's view, the Chronicler was an agent of The Source and arrived from the Overvoid.
Agents of Source can manipulate said Void which is impossible if it were High 1-A+.
I'm not dictating/proposing what is consistent across different writers or not. That's for a different thread. I'm just archiving what previous authors have said and what later authors have said.
If we archive previous notion then Overvoid isn't higher than The Source or warrant of High 1-A.
Your original posting was asking if The Source = The Overvoid.
No, it was not. I was questioning why the Source is differentiate from the Overvoid, if we’re taking Morrison's view of the Overvoid being non-dual.

=/= means non-equivalency because @Elizio33 separated the two. My way of addrresing that is “=/=?” is questioning the absurdity of that.
To Morrison, they were kinda the same.

To Snyder and James Tynion IV, they were separate.

To Joshua Williamson and Dennis Culver, they seem to be.

Tate Brombal is unclear depending on where the "light", "darkness," and creator came from.
The Creator always existed, but is not “consciounesly active” until a while. The Darkness is eternal, The Source and Overvoid are byproduct of that Darkness or more so “brought” from the nothing (Darkness) into being. If they're not “eternal” as The Presence is then they had an origin.
 
It seems like you're agreeing with my stance about why taking one view is not at all going to work since recent information supersedes the previous.

So the other parts you've found a non-issue @Firestorm808
 
I can get Ultima statements about Time, Night, and The Endless > Yahweh, Michael, and Lucifer. If the latter are High 1-A, then the former can't be 1-A+. Not to mention, I clearly addressed this in a thread that details out the Cosmology a lot better than what it is now.

The Presence and The Archangels are > The Hands. Both are High 1-A, again thanks to me, but The Endless, who outscale both aren't? Amazing.
lmao why are we still trying to act like the Endless are above the Hands when a comic from this year literally showed that Perpetua created them.
 
It seems like you're agreeing with my stance about why taking one view is not at all going to work since recent information supersedes the previous.
I see these conflicting views between writer perspectives and will wait if there is possible information that may address these concerns. At this point in time, I am withholding an official opinion on the matter.
So the other parts you've found a non-issue @Firestorm808
Sorry. I have not looked at the other sections of your original post.
 
lmao why are we still trying to act like the Endless are above the Hands when a comic from this year literally showed that Perpetua created them.
Perpetua didn’t “create” them. She literally just made a structure under the three stages of matter. I wonder what comic ever eludes to this notion because there's no such statement.
 
It would be beneficial, I think, if anyone just posted the scans that Goofy finds contentious. Otherwise this discussion looks like everyone is fighting ghosts
 
Ultima makes a better point than this nonsense approach and I’ll list the details in @Xearesay contrived headcanon.

Ultima already details how much more powerful The Endless abstract selves are compared to their aspect and The Archangels with all the evidence from the story.

^I’ll get to what he's referring to, but pay attention to “When all was Void.”

Firstly, The New History Book regards the Superceletsial as shaping energy into the Big Bang ie being supplemented through the Source of Creation. Said energy is distinct from Perpetua, evidently that energy gave rise to “The Endless” which is fine because the statement prior already showed Perpetua was locked up which we see in Justice League was a decently lengthy time. We see that she was already banished before the Multiverse was reset and tried again with a different approach.

Luckily, Mark Waid references Justice League #22 a work of Tynion IV with Snyder consulting on his behalf (Since the cosmic stuff was handled by Tynion)

Then, we get so many interviews and things from the storytelling about “Perpetua's predatory Universe before the main Multiverse as it is now.” As The Hands/and or something from the Greater Omniverse remaking it due to her meddling in things she's not meant to do because that Multiversal power was ultimately The Source’s energy thus her energy born of The Source would return and her Creation run without her after she nurtures it into existence.

So much so Perpetua claims it was a perversion of what she wanted and that she’ll remake it in her image again. Using external powers since she doesn't even have any Demiurgic energy to spawns an entire Creation unlike what dreams can do as Ultima attested to and I’ll get to it.

The Endless Actual Origin (Creation, not side-effect):​

If anyone read Overture as Ultima mentioned it answered it all there.

The laws of conversation of reality was set upon all beings written in The Void before anything existed, which all the Dreams’ attest to remember that the council set.

The origin?

It comes when Dream meets Time, his father. Time encompasses all moments and existence as a whole in which they exist and don't exist.

He gave “The Endless” their beingness because he's the relentless beat in which all things happen and could happen, in which they become and don’t. So The Endless already predates Creation because Time rose from Night and made them possible because in moments of which things exist and don't (Refers to Death), in which all things are from in which he gave everything had was to Destiny because his book traces everything as we can see that Destiny metaphorically cast a shadow over all Creation because all things are bound to fate because that's the foundation The Presence made it to be, and in which encompasses all things.

Time: “After all I gave you your existence, and in moments to exist.”

As perfectly said by Ultima, he encompasses all of existence and see it in one single ourbourus because he's outside with the effect of dreams and destiny. We see this when he see Daniel Hall in the current Creation while overlooking Morpheus before the events of Sandman while knowing that his Selecum would be returned by another Dream in a different time (Cat Dream, which existed before Morpheus' conception after Desire stole it).

All moments embody, the existence of The Endless “abstract form” which Mark Waid references with Sandman #21, and this scan:
Dream said it himself.

Destiny is the blueprint in which all things take their genesis (beyond beginning and endings while The Fate, the aspect of The Three relies on sight from the Book) and Dream is the unreal that was shaped by dreams from nothing into something in which became real and without the unreal couldn't have been.

Time realm is his essence and being, Morpheus' experience moment and events in microseconds. Cause-and-effect completely disconnected which I showed earlier build Yahweh’s Creation and binds even The Formless, Jin En Moks.

Conclusion:​

1. All was Void; Night
2. Time came from Night, which is the moment in which the “Abstract Endless” existed.
3. The Council sets rules and boundaries for The Universe.
4. Night and Time came together; all versions and possible versions of Creation was made possible.
5. Repeats with Creators until we reach the main Creation with Morpheus when he has his self-aspect far older than he, and all “aspects” being projected by the true abstraction of their self.

Dreams says he can see in the eyes of a cat in infinity from now. Now (Morpheus) preceded by the Cat version of Dream, preceded by a multiplicity of dreams until the First Dream of The First Creation, all dreams are aspects of “Dream” purest which was actualized from Time outside and before all versions of Creation which is changed by dreams that define reality.

This comes with any statements:

1. Dream already crafted artifacts before The Dawn of Time. (The Sandman Vol.2 #2)

2. Death recalls the creation of Michael and Lucifer in the darkness before time. (Lucifer Vol.1 #26)

3. Destruction remembers the Light and the Big Bang. (The Sandman Vol.2 #44)

4. Emanated from a Monad in a timeless nothing beyond flesh and space. Which dreams existed even in the most primal times and exist in all moments during even when all was Void as none could “recall the birth of the Sleep.” (The Dreaming Vol.2 #11)

Conclusion Again:​

Monad/God (Yahweh’s true self) > Night > Time > Endless (Pure Abstraction) ~ Yahweh > Michael and Lucifer > The Council > Aspects of the Endless ~ The Hands > Perpetua.
 
Last edited:
Ultima makes a better point than this nonsense approach and I’ll list the details in @Xearesay contrived headcanon.

Ultima already details how much more powerful The Endless abstract selves are compared to their aspect and The Archangels with all the evidence from the story.

^I’ll get to what he's referring to, but pay attention to “When all was Void.”

Firstly, The New History Book regards the Superceletsial as shaping energy into the Big Bang ie being supplemented through the Source of Creation. Said energy is distinct from Perpetua, evidently that energy gave rise to “The Endless” which is fine because the statement prior already showed Perpetua was locked up which we see in Justice League was a decently lengthy time. We see that she was already banished before the Multiverse was reset and tried again with a different approach.

Luckily, Mark Waid references Justice League #22 a work of Tynion IV with Snyder consulting on his behalf (Since the cosmic stuff was handled by Tynion)

Then, we get so many interviews and things from the storytelling about “Perpetua's predatory Universe before the main Multiverse as it is now.” As The Hands/and or something from the Greater Omniverse remaking it due to her meddling in things she's not meant to do because that Multiversal power was ultimately The Source’s energy thus her energy born of The Source would return and her Creation run without her after she nurtures it into existence.

So much so Perpetua claims it was a perversion of what she wanted and that she’ll remake it in her image again. Using external powers since she doesn't even have any Demiurgic energy to spawns an entire Creation unlike what dreams can do as Ultima attested to and I’ll get to it.

The Endless Actual Origin (Creation, not side-effect):​

If anyone read Overture as Ultima mentioned it answered it all there.

The laws of conversation of reality was set upon all beings written in The Void before anything existed, which all the Dreams’ attest to remember that the council set.

The origin?

It comes when Dream meets Time, his father. Time encompasses all moments and existence as a whole in which they exist and don't exist.

He gave “The Endless” their beingness because he's the relentless beat in which all things happen and could happen, in which they become and don’t. So The Endless already predates Creation because Time rose from Night and made them possible because in moments of which things exist and don't (Refers to Death), in which all things are from in which he gave everything had was to Destiny because his book traces everything as we can see that Destiny metaphorically cast a shadow over all Creation because all things are bound to fate because that's the foundation The Presence made it to be, and in which encompasses all things.

Time: “After all I gave you your existence, and in moments to exist.”

As perfectly said by Ultima, he encompasses all of existence and see it in one single ourbourus because he's outside with the effect of dreams and destiny. We see this when he see Daniel Hall in the current Creation while overlooking Morpheus before the events of Sandman while knowing that his Selecum would be returned by another Dream in a different time (Cat Dream, which existed before Morpheus' conception after Desire stole it).

All moments embody, the existence of The Endless “abstract form” which Mark Waid references with Sandman #21, and this scan:

Dream said it himself.

Destiny is the blueprint in which all things take their genesis (beyond beginning and endings while The Fate, the aspect of The Three relies on sight from the Book) and Dream is the unreal that was shaped by dreams from nothing into something in which became real and without the unreal couldn't have been.

Time realm is his essence and being, Morpheus' experience moment and events in microseconds. Cause-and-effect completely disconnected which I showed earlier build Yahweh’s Creation and binds even The Formless, Jin En Moks.

Conclusion:​

1. All was Void; Night
2. Time came from Night, which is the moment in which the “Abstract Endless” existed.
3. The Council sets rules and boundaries for The Universe.
4. Night and Time came together; all versions and possible versions of Creation was made possible.
5. Repeats with Creators until we reach the main Creation with Morpheus when he has his self-aspect far older than he, and all “aspects” being projected by the true abstraction of their self.

Dreams says he can see in the eyes of a cat in infinity from now. Now (Morpheus) preceded by the Cat version of Dream, preceded by a multiplicity of dreams until the First Dream of The First Creation, all dreams are aspects of “Dream” purest which was actualized from Time outside and before all versions of Creation which is changed by dreams that define reality.

This comes with any statements:

1. Dream already crafted artifacts before The Dawn of Time. (The Sandman Vol.2 #2)

2. Death recalls the creation of Michael and Lucifer in the darkness before time. (Lucifer Vol.1 #26)

3. Destruction remembers the Light and the Big Bang. (The Sandman Vol.2 #44)

4. Emanated from a Monad in a timeless nothing beyond flesh and space. Which dreams existed even in the most primal times and exist in all moments during even when all was Void as none could “recall the birth of the Sleep.” (The Dreaming Vol.2 #11)

Conclusion Again:​

Monad/God (Yahweh’s true self) > Night > Time > Endless (Pure Abstraction) ~ Yahweh > Michael and Lucifer > The Council > Aspects of the Endless ~ The Hands > Perpetua.
To add to Ultima telling us about the powers of Dream vs Perpetua;

Perpetua has no technical Multiversal feat.

She created the Multiverse

Said Multiverse was already energy formed from the Source in which Perpetua possesses powers external to her. Struggling to destroy universes at a time while being fueled heavily by Crisis Energy and the fact that she possessed the Totality at that time.

Not to mention, she explicitly states her Multiverse “is/was” just formed under the tripartite form, that was all there is. Outside of that she didn't make worlds, realms, etc…that was the natural evolution of the Multiverse that she just oversaw.

Dream, however does, have Multiversal feats.

Few thousand dreams changed all of Creation from the beginning of time and until its end. The Endless has never (outside Desire trickery) have tried to abuse their power. Dream power is the hardest since that encompasses the change in the Multiverse as a whole. He's done it twice (Presumably the power of dreams has done it countless amount of time due to the origins of viewpoints).

Morpheus used a few thousand dream of reform and birth again the Multiverse from nothing.

Daniel Hall stepped outside Creation and used a mundane egg which hatch and shape a new Creation in the Void. Which, he has access to the Dreaming, which already houses stories and dreaming beyond the thousands, in which he could easily use to create as many Creations or redo them as he wants.

Dream true abstraction is “Greater Omniverse” tier since all projection/aspects are mere glinting light projected from an “endless perfect jewel” which Ultima already said is “way beyond” The Archangels. Last I recall, Michael Demiurgos holds the infinite power of God, he doesn't have a limit to his “AP or DP” in Creation-making and destroying others than Yahweh for forbiding him to use his power outside of what he intends for him to do. Dream > Michael the Demiurge, whose powers is limitless and can spawn any amount of Creation, if he weren't so loyal like Lucifer. Lucifer already address that his Creation “borders stretches to infinity” and he can unweave “infinity” on a Creation scale.

Chain-scaling; The Presence > Perpetua, The Presence's totality of power vested into Michael, Michael outscaled heavily by Dream (albeit he's stronger than Morphues) Therefore, Dream > Michael > Perpetua.
 
IrSiGHv.jpeg

Wouldn't this argument place the Dreaming at a level of power beyond its placement in the cosmology?
 
yes
even at nearly full power perpetua is only capable of destroying one at a time
Yeah, she's ain't nowhere near Michael AP or DP even Michael possessing the infinite power of Yahweh would do nothing to Dream (pure abstraction). He could get rid of Morpheus or Daniel Hall, but they would be replaced. He gets rid of Creation entirely, and another pops up in its place and there's an infinite regression.

The Endless abstract forms aren't even tangible. The “Endless” are anthropomorphic (Gaiman made it clear, they're not human, but for the sake of story-telling he tells us to imagine concepts with human traits), but their true self is just pure concept last I recall, that's impossible to remove unless Night wins over everything.
 
IrSiGHv.jpeg

Wouldn't this argument place the Dreaming at a level of power beyond its placement in the cosmology?
The Dreaming and Morpheus are one. (The Sandman Vol.2 #2)

The aspect of Dream encompasses the Dreaming, the aspect of the Dreaming encompasses Dream. (The Sandman Vol.2 #60)

The true heart of the Dreaming was already formed by Morpehus in the formlenness before the Dreaming was conceptualized. (The Sandman Vol.2 #44)

Morpheus is not just lord of the Dreaming, but everything that the Dreaming is. (The Sandman: Overture Vol.1 #3)

They're one and the same ie the viewpoint is the Dreaming, the abstract form is beyond both, Ultima mentioned it as well.

Also, like Morrison, Gaiman specializes his lore about The Endless, so not many authors dwell into like he does, but his information isn't really contracted since it’s always the aspect that's is being used and not the whole.
 
IrSiGHv.jpeg

Wouldn't this argument place the Dreaming at a level of power beyond its placement in the cosmology?
Also, to add something, he argues that Dream is also maybe above Yahweh ie Geyes and Garames abusing dreams to get their position although he says Dream is the strongest in his purest in his family and his legit feat of bringing back the entire Multiverse is no less than Lucifer killing Michael to bring about a Multiverse, but we know his stance Dream > Lucifer and Michael, he's not so sure about The Presence outside the shape of “Yahweh.”

This was the chattest I've seen Ultima be. We argue for hours and it continued the next day. I realized @Sandman31 always preached the Endless > Lucifer and Michael although extending it to Yahweh is a little iffy, even Ultima isn't so sure about.
 
Last edited:

I'm not sure if these two scans have been mentioned, but they point out some really interesting details.
The Big Bang gave rise to stars, planets, and the Endless-seven powerful entities who each represented an aspect of this new reality. Among them were Destiny, Death, and the Dream Lord, master of his realm, the Dreaming.
 
@Elizio33

What do you think about this? 🙏
The story in Sandman #22 existed before Vertigo and the DC Universe merged into a single cosmology, and even then, there are contradictions. The Silver City was supposed to be beyond Creation in Sandman, while it was described as being at the heart of Creation in The New History of the DC Universe. I understand that Mark Waid acknowledged older stories as the source for his guide to DC history, but that doesn't change the fact that the Endless are now byproducts of the Big Bang caused by Perpetua when she created the Multiverse while the story Waid referenced (Sandman) in his guide says otherwise. The Endless are just recontextualized within the new cosmological ladder. The “true extent” statement from Sandman #22 remains valid, the Endless transcend Creation’s lower realms, but they are not external to the Big Bang. Every being in the Sphere of the Gods have a "true extent" that transcend the physical universe and are essential to it. The Endless are no different here.


As for Perpetua, she didn't create everything in the Multiverse, indeed. She built a tripartite structure from the energies provided to her by the Source. The rest, like the Endless or the Sphere of the Gods, is the result of the Big Bang shaped by Perpetua during the creation of her reality. This has already been discussed and clarified well by @Xearesay that the Endless are not beyond the Monitors or Hands.
 
Last edited:
As for the Source, Light, Greater Darkness, and Overvoid, I expressed my concerns about equating Source/Light with Overvoid because the Justice League Incarnate recap was narrated by Doctor Multiverse whose claims about the Great Darkness' involvement in Crises and Pariah being the voice of the Great Darkness were false. The Great Darkness was never involved in the Dark Crisis on Infinite Earths, it was just in Pariah's head and the darkness was a fraction of the Great Darkness that he stole with his machines. So, using a recap told by someone whose reliability is questionable to affirm that the Overvoid is the Light is a bit dubious. As for the Great Darkness, it is not defined through the absence of light, but through its presence. The Great Darkness can only be defined through the presence of another, and that other is the Source/Light. Swamp Thing's story made this very clear when the Great Darkness declared that before the Light, he was nameless and did not need a name. While the Darkness predate the Source, it is a force that makes a balance with the Source/Light. They both resides within the Void.
 
Last edited:
And @VeryGoofyToddler2, my cosmology blog, is still a work in progress. I'm very busy with real-life topics, so I'm doing my best to create something for DC Cosmology. It's not perfect, sure, but calling something "absurd" or "stupid" just because it doesn't fit your point of view is very unprofessional in my opinion. Let's not forget that we're talking about fiction first and foremost, not real-life topics.
 
And @VeryGoofyToddler2, my cosmology blog, is still a work in progress. I'm very busy with real-life topics, so I'm doing my best to create something for DC Cosmology. It's not perfect, sure, but calling something "absurd" or "stupid" just because it doesn't fit your point of view is very unprofessional in my opinion. Let's not forget that we're talking about fiction first and foremost, not real-life topics.
Unprofessional in what sense? That's a matter of subjective opinion, Ultima has blatantly called threads in the past, “stupid, dumb, and whatnot.” I’m not attacking you on anything, so I can call it that, you can:

A. Ignore it

Or

B. Just address the core issue.

You're allowed to say dumb or absurd within reason. I didn't overstep any line. We’re all different, but there's no way this is where we're drawing the line.

I didn't say: “You’re stupid and you're thread is stupid.”

All I said was questioning some logic and calling it dumb to believe so is addressing why that viewpoint was taken, not of your character. If you want me to use a less bold term then:

“To view it as such is quite not a view that goes with what the scan implies thus I cannot agree to such interpretations of said story.”

You want it addressed in a formality like that? There's nothing wrong with saying something is dumb when you're not blatantly making it the case to attack someone. In the past, I'm pretty sure people have said similar things, it’s not outside ethical uses.
 
Unprofessional in what sense? That's a matter of subjective opinion, Ultima has blatantly called threads in the past, “stupid, dumb, and whatnot.” I’m not attacking you on anything, so I can call it that, you can:

A. Ignore it

Or

B. Just address the core issue.

You're allowed to say dumb or absurd within reason. I didn't overstep any line. We’re all different, but there's no way this is where we're drawing the line.

I didn't say: “You’re stupid and you're thread is stupid.”

All I said was questioning some logic and calling it dumb to believe so is addressing why that viewpoint was taken, not of your character. If you want me to use a less bold term then:

“To view it as such is quite not a view that goes with what the scan implies thus I cannot agree to such interpretations of said story.”

You want it addressed in a formality like that? There's nothing wrong with saying something is dumb when you're not blatantly making it the case to attack someone. In the past, I'm pretty sure people have said similar things, it’s not outside ethical uses.
I understand what you're saying, and I don't take it personally. I just think there's a difference between challenging an argument and calling it "absurd" or "stupid." Even if it's not directed at someone, that kind of phrasing can easily come across as dismissive in a text. I'm not asking for excessive formality, just a little mutual respect when discussing ideas. We're all here to analyze and exchange interpretations, and I have no problem with disagreements when they're framed constructively. :)
 
As for the Source, Light, Greater Darkness, and Overvoid, I expressed my concerns about equating Source/Light with Overvoid because the Justice League Incarnate recap was narrated by Doctor Multiverse whose claims about the Great Darkness' involvement in Crises and Pariah being the voice of the Great Darkness were false.
What?

That falseness about the nature of the Darkness involvement is not correlated to his history.

Crisis On Infinite Earths was used as a reference to the Darkness being the nothing and everything as the single black infinitude. Outside “Dark Crisis,” this was used as I mentioned through COIE, there's nothing inconsistent about that.

The origin of the Light is in reference to again, COIE where from Darkness, came Light. What is so “wrong” or “false” about that?

Overvoid being the perfect immculation of Light then showing the “AND THEN!” from Multiversity is the reference point using.

So Doctor Multiverse statement on the nature of the Darkness =/= just a recall of history about the Darkness. So again, is there a reason why her story about not knowing if the Darkness was responsible for the Crises mean anything about just the origin story? She's definitely not lying about the timeline as everything was told in chronological order by publication, her theory of what the Darkness true intention doesn't change that, that's a different matter.
The Great Darkness was never involved in the Dark Crisis on Infinite Earths, it was just in Pariah's head and the darkness was a fraction of the Great Darkness that he stole with his machines.
What does this have to do about the Darkness being eternal and the void beyond everything? The Darkness said it himself when we meet him.
So, using a recap told by someone whose reliability is questionable to affirm that the Overvoid is the Light is a bit dubious.
No, it’s not. The reference to Multiversity and “immaculate perfection” just happens to be a coincidence.

Morrison states Source = Overvoid = God
Every other author followed this logic. If Light is analogous to this then why is the logic of “it can’t be The Overvoid.” Then it can't also be The Source since no one every put the two as “different things” maybe aside in Death Metal where Source is conscious energy and Snyder take on a supreme being, and the Overvoid was just treated as space outside the Multiverse.

As for the Great Darkness, it is not defined through the absence of light, but through its presence. The Great Darkness can only be defined through the presence of another, and that other is the Source/Light. Swamp Thing's story made this very clear when the Great Darkness declared that before the Light, he was nameless and did not need a name. While the Darkness predate the Source, it is a force that makes a balance with the Source/Light. They both resides within the Void.
“They both reside within the Void”

The story makes it clear it “IS” The Void. Even Swamp Thing's said it was the primordial shadow all alone and before anything because it was the Void. Nevertheless, New Gods also mentions this.

Here's how to read this:
You can interpret as freely as you want, but there is a right and wrong interpretation.

Remember what I said about the Nameless Dao, naming it doesn't make it “Nameless” because it beats the purpose and namesake.

So the Darkness in reference to the Source in the scan says that it is not “total darkness.” The reason is that “total” darkness means that it is absent of light since all is darkness. The great darkness that can be referenced through the presence of another is exemplifying that the “darkness” is no longer just “only darkness” ie total darkness.

The second sentence contradicts if you say it otherwise. Like I said “The Source/Light/Overvoid” existence is the reason why there's no “more total darkness.” This would now become partial/some/great darkness, but not total darkness.

Darkness doesn't require The Light because total darkness was a thing for a very long time, in the non-presence of Light. He literally said he could snuff it out and watch in unkindle itself like a great show for his amusement.
 
I understand what you're saying, and I don't take it personally. I just think there's a difference between challenging an argument and calling it "absurd" or "stupid." Even if it's not directed at someone, that kind of phrasing can easily come across as dismissive in a text. I'm not asking for excessive formality, just a little mutual respect when discussing ideas. We're all here to analyze and exchange interpretations, and I have no problem with disagreements when they're framed constructively. :)
Alright fair, my current response to your point about the Darkness I think should answer your doubts.
 
Goofy, stop hijacking the general discussion thread in order to get attention, and show respect to Elizio33, and allow him the time to finish preparing the revision that he works on. 🙏
 
Goofy, stop hijacking the general discussion thread in order to get attention, and show respect to Elizio33, and allow him the time to finish preparing the revision that he works on. 🙏
Do you have a problem with me?

Elizio asked for constructive cirictism and I did which I also took the time and effort into making, he also isn't entitled to read it.

Also, he said it was fine with him, as long as it wasn't intentional, and it wasn't. He just wants constructive criticism which I have with evidence.

I swear, I'm getting some sort of special Xearsay treatment here when I am by rule allowed to do this. You need to stop overstepping your title and think that's a bit okay for you to berate something that's already resolved and is “allowed.”

Stop talking to me. So annoying and pretentious.
 
I have a big problem with your very unreasonable and disrespectful attitude, yes, and I am not overstepping my authority here, you are overstepping yours. 🙏
 
I have a big problem with your attitude, yes, and I am not overstepping my authority here, you are overstepping yours. 🙏
Addressing your thing aside. In a thread about DC, we’re discussing DC.

With that aside, I clearly wasn't being rude even acknowledged here. The terminology I used was at best brash and blunt which again Elizio understood:
I understand what you're saying, and I don't take it personally. I just think there's a difference between challenging an argument and calling it "absurd" or "stupid." Even if it's not directed at someone, that kind of phrasing can easily come across as dismissive in a text. I'm not asking for excessive formality, just a little mutual respect when discussing ideas. We're all here to analyze and exchange interpretations, and I have no problem with disagreements when they're framed constructively. :)
For some reason you can't. I agree to be less brash.
 
If you make an ongoing effort to be polite, respectful, and reasonable enough to respect staff verdicts, and avoid excessive statistics exaggerations, I likely won't have a problem with you anymore. 🙏
 
Ultima makes a better point than this nonsense approach and I’ll list the details in @Xearesay contrived headcanon.

Ultima already details how much more powerful The Endless abstract selves are compared to their aspect and The Archangels with all the evidence from the story.

^I’ll get to what he's referring to, but pay attention to “When all was Void.”

Firstly, The New History Book regards the Superceletsial as shaping energy into the Big Bang ie being supplemented through the Source of Creation. Said energy is distinct from Perpetua, evidently that energy gave rise to “The Endless” which is fine because the statement prior already showed Perpetua was locked up which we see in Justice League was a decently lengthy time. We see that she was already banished before the Multiverse was reset and tried again with a different approach.

Luckily, Mark Waid references Justice League #22 a work of Tynion IV with Snyder consulting on his behalf (Since the cosmic stuff was handled by Tynion)

Then, we get so many interviews and things from the storytelling about “Perpetua's predatory Universe before the main Multiverse as it is now.” As The Hands/and or something from the Greater Omniverse remaking it due to her meddling in things she's not meant to do because that Multiversal power was ultimately The Source’s energy thus her energy born of The Source would return and her Creation run without her after she nurtures it into existence.

So much so Perpetua claims it was a perversion of what she wanted and that she’ll remake it in her image again. Using external powers since she doesn't even have any Demiurgic energy to spawns an entire Creation unlike what dreams can do as Ultima attested to and I’ll get to it.

The Endless Actual Origin (Creation, not side-effect):​

If anyone read Overture as Ultima mentioned it answered it all there.

The laws of conversation of reality was set upon all beings written in The Void before anything existed, which all the Dreams’ attest to remember that the council set.

The origin?

It comes when Dream meets Time, his father. Time encompasses all moments and existence as a whole in which they exist and don't exist.

He gave “The Endless” their beingness because he's the relentless beat in which all things happen and could happen, in which they become and don’t. So The Endless already predates Creation because Time rose from Night and made them possible because in moments of which things exist and don't (Refers to Death), in which all things are from in which he gave everything had was to Destiny because his book traces everything as we can see that Destiny metaphorically cast a shadow over all Creation because all things are bound to fate because that's the foundation The Presence made it to be, and in which encompasses all things.

Time: “After all I gave you your existence, and in moments to exist.”

As perfectly said by Ultima, he encompasses all of existence and see it in one single ourbourus because he's outside with the effect of dreams and destiny. We see this when he see Daniel Hall in the current Creation while overlooking Morpheus before the events of Sandman while knowing that his Selecum would be returned by another Dream in a different time (Cat Dream, which existed before Morpheus' conception after Desire stole it).

All moments embody, the existence of The Endless “abstract form” which Mark Waid references with Sandman #21, and this scan:

Dream said it himself.

Destiny is the blueprint in which all things take their genesis (beyond beginning and endings while The Fate, the aspect of The Three relies on sight from the Book) and Dream is the unreal that was shaped by dreams from nothing into something in which became real and without the unreal couldn't have been.

Time realm is his essence and being, Morpheus' experience moment and events in microseconds. Cause-and-effect completely disconnected which I showed earlier build Yahweh’s Creation and binds even The Formless, Jin En Moks.

Conclusion:​

1. All was Void; Night
2. Time came from Night, which is the moment in which the “Abstract Endless” existed.
3. The Council sets rules and boundaries for The Universe.
4. Night and Time came together; all versions and possible versions of Creation was made possible.
5. Repeats with Creators until we reach the main Creation with Morpheus when he has his self-aspect far older than he, and all “aspects” being projected by the true abstraction of their self.

Dreams says he can see in the eyes of a cat in infinity from now. Now (Morpheus) preceded by the Cat version of Dream, preceded by a multiplicity of dreams until the First Dream of The First Creation, all dreams are aspects of “Dream” purest which was actualized from Time outside and before all versions of Creation which is changed by dreams that define reality.

This comes with any statements:

1. Dream already crafted artifacts before The Dawn of Time. (The Sandman Vol.2 #2)

2. Death recalls the creation of Michael and Lucifer in the darkness before time. (Lucifer Vol.1 #26)

3. Destruction remembers the Light and the Big Bang. (The Sandman Vol.2 #44)

4. Emanated from a Monad in a timeless nothing beyond flesh and space. Which dreams existed even in the most primal times and exist in all moments during even when all was Void as none could “recall the birth of the Sleep.” (The Dreaming Vol.2 #11)

Conclusion Again:​

Monad/God (Yahweh’s true self) > Night > Time > Endless (Pure Abstraction) ~ Yahweh > Michael and Lucifer > The Council > Aspects of the Endless ~ The Hands > Perpetua.

I'm reading back on what I missed. So there's that and this time I won't take a break on the responses so I'm not bombarded by so many messages.


Ok, I see some issues with this that look like a generic copy-cat of outdated information. I swear I've seen that sort of format and half of it is contrived information.

Greater Omniverse:​

  • Mansions of Silence: This realm is not outside Creation and it was never stated as such. The location as said by Belgelmir is at the edge of the coin on each side of the afterlives to those who do not harbor Heaven nor Hell. It isn't outside the “coin” and it isn't outside Creation. All that Cal said was that it was beyond Silver City, which also is in Creation and is interconnected physically to Armaggdeon Plain which is in the eastern aspect of Heaven.
There's a difference between Heaven and the Silver City in Lucifer which was the slipside in Sandman. Nevertheless, I made a literal profile showing where it actually is, and it is not outside Creation.

The only things outside Creation we see in Lucifer are Yggdrasil and Eden Garden. Perhaps, the pocket reality that Sandalphon crafted was held by Michael’s God given powers.

Read the profile:

Then this is why I consulted with @Ultima_Reality about things like this because I knew we would fall into dumb stipulation. The Endless scaling is so dumb and Ultima could explain which no one would complain if he did. Nevertheless, it's somehow bound to “Creation” due to DC New History:

Time, Night, and The Endless:​

  • We know Time isn't in Creation because his whole being encompasses it all when they exist and do not. His coming within Night is the reason for Creation's existence, so they wouldn't be randomly pushed into Creation since cause-and-effect is the structural foundation of Yahweh’s existence and Time realms lack that and see all his children on all their “moments” existing in time of their inception and whatnot.
  • Night is obvious, she predates all beginnings and survives all endings. She's the eternal cosmic emptiness that had always existed with the worlds of light above her realm of true darkness.
  • The Endless in their aspects were born into Creation. The New History books mentioned nothing of their true self. I've already put their “True Form” key in their profile, which again the New History Book had mentioned about Sandman #22 which tells us that their “aspects” are mere glinting light nothing more than tiny specks of light in their true form.
Let’s recall the many times they were stated to predate Creation, in their truest self.
  • Morpheus tells Cain and Adam, he carpeted artifacts before the Dawn of Time.
  • Morpheus tells Corinthian about the laws established when all was void. Which he was present for.
  • Let’s recall that the Endless were actualized in their truest self from the essence of “Time” because Time is all of existence in which they began, end, and will exist.
  • Let’s recall Destruction saying the Light and the Big Bang were lousy and loud things that bothered him.
  • Let’s also recall that the first version of the Endless is also all the same Dream because each Dream is projected by their true self since all of them recall that they existed since the Void.
There's more, but I digress. They're not bound to time. Ultima, another expert on DC Comics, and I discussed that Time, Night, and Endless transcend Michael and Lucifer by a long shot. So if they're High 1-A then obviously Endless would be as well. You can check out the experts answer here about the History Book and the more accurate lore since the guide books don't paint the fill picture, but, nevertheless, the guidebook never even contradicted the source material.

The answer is very long, but it left no detail out. This is why I prefer Ultima to come here and see this bogus cosmology take.

The Overvoid =/= The Source?​

This is also the dumbest thing. In all the mention of the Overvoid (I’ve read all of it) outside interview, which the term “non-dual” was rarely ever coined. I, recall, the Overvoid being non-dual only in Morrison’s Green Latern run. Which he happened to also draw the Multiversity Map with the Source being outside everything, which he admits there's no difference between The Source and The Overvoid.

Then in Final Crisis: Secret Files, he explained that the Source “is not dual.” In his rough sketch of Multiversity, he said the Source is the white page outside all of Creation.

Last I recalled outside him, It was never stated The Overvoid was non-dual especially since Justice League: Incarnate which references the very same story of the Overvoid being described during Morrison's time. In Death Metal, even Ultima agreed that the Overvoid is nothing like Final Crisis, it isn't “consciousness nor ground of being” since beings existing in it and being created from its “rent” is impossible.

Not to mention the true void that is self-referential and eternal is the Darkness. We see this in New Gods, Absolute Green Lantern, Absolute Maratin Manhunter, Green Lantern: Dark. The list goes on.

Lastly, I also recall that The Greater Omniverse and The Overvoid were the same thing in Snyder's take of the Void that houses Creation. Last I also recalled they never retcon it being the realm of light before the Multiverse and came into being from the Darkness.

The Divine Presence =/= The Presence?​

As shown above this is stupid. I've read all of DeMatteis’ story, talked to him, read all his interviews. I recount he coined the Presence twice, ever. One in Spectre and the other in Phantom Stranger. All else, he uses “The Presence.” The Presence is just a title that denotes both aspects and the whole, adding the word “divine” makes no difference. Divine Presence was mentioned in a Gaudium storyline in describing the transcendence of Yahweh who was above the immance of his Creation.

What kind of logic is this? Nevertheless, DeMatteis has said it more than 10 times, “The Presence” contains the Void and dreams of the Universe, he literally stated this in Superhirl: Wings when Zauriel was conversing with a demon, that the Presence dreams of everything and everything was just his thoughts and imagination. The same thing was said in a previous comic in Spectre #10, so yeah, why the hell are we counting it like that?

I could continue on, but I've already out everything about the “true extent” of the elemental realms. The recent Aquaman comics and the statement about the Blue/Clear already reaffirms each of the elemental realms are grander in their purest form. I listed the entirety of Animal Man in the current Cosmology page, and there's no actual good rebbutal against it because we tone it to only the smallest aspect of it’s power.
Okay, you’ll be tested with your words. I'll call out for your hypocrisy, if you go against it. In the meantime since two pages past, if anyone wants to see the core issue then tag them again about it here. We can just address it here.

In the meantime, I rather, not want anything to do with you.
 
It is hard to avoid each other since we are largely focused on the same verses. 🙏
 

I'm not sure if these two scans have been mentioned, but they point out some really interesting details.

Yeah, but it’s details we already know. This book is a step-by-step guide. It won't list all the details and I've already shown.

I forgot to mention this, but I don't see “Perpetua created the Endless” anywhere in the scans, but I will address some core issue with that logic.

The scan states “they shape the energies of The Source.” They refer to as the Big Bang.

Last I recall, Michael and Lucifer did the exact thing, however, there's some core difference:

Michael:
  • Did it with his own power, so his “energy” isn't a distinct thing from him.
  • Didn't shape the Big Bang, but literally generated it.
Lucifer:
  • Did not create the Big Bang because that power was crafted from Michael.
  • He didn't create it, but “shaped it.”
Perpetua:
  • Shape the Creation energy of the Source into a Big Bang.
  • Did not create said energy nor is it hers.
Ah, see the rub up above. This also goes into my next few details.

Last, I, recall Perpetua did not create anything outside the three realms of matter (alongside her sons, but the Multiverse was already designed by then, but it was empty) thus The Endless weren’t her direct Creation, they're a result of The Bug Bang happening anyway in spite of Perpetua existence which the Multiverse could live without.

The Presence:
  • Did not create The Endless, the act of Creation, or the existence of reality, more so is why The Endless exist.
This is they have no “technical” origin point, they are just defined through the existence of…..Existence. They dependency factor is through their own means of existence in Creation, and not connected at all to any Creator.

Their true abstract self were actualized by Time essence when he came into being, they all came because Time is the “potential” in which all exists and will not. All of them originated from the point of no-time and no-space, but endless void; Night.

I mean Tynion explains it pretty well, the energy of Creation and it’s conception existed, it just needed to be melded into shape:

So said “material” are external to her and already existed in The Source. It was required to be bridled and formed into shape. So, the scan never mentions Perpetua created them and she was banished (Already banshied by then before the third quotation box about the rise of Creation, which rose without her), and “History began anew without her” and so, how, exactly is shaping something into the Big Bang, which said “Big Bang” is disntict from being the source in which the viewpoints of The Endless came, illicit the idea that Perpetua “created” them? She didn't even create the material/energy anyways, she just fashioned it into shape.

Last I recall, The Presence said Creation-making does not require a maker or a weaver. The potential of existence was always there, thus The Endless comes in spite of any Creator. The shape of existence was always a thing since it was pregnant with form in which it would have came.

So, Yahweh, Lucifer, Michael, and Perpetua are all in the same boat; none of them directly made The Endless.

Ultima already made the point Endless > Michael and Lucifer. We can all agree that Michael and Lucifer are easily above Perpetua in power, by a long shot. Downgrading The Endless to 1-A means The Archangels, Yahweh, and Perpetua are themselves are also 1-A. I don't have a problem with 1-A, but The Endless are more powerful that should be a given.
 
Last edited:
I sent them hoping they might help remove the “likely” and replace it with a solid High 1-A key instead, for Perpetua
 
Ultima already made the point Endless > Michael and Lucifer. We can all agree that Michael and Lucifer are easily above Perpetua in power, by a long shot. Downgrading The Endless to 1-A means The Archangels, Yahweh, and Perpetua are themselves are also 1-A. I don't have a problem with 1-A, but The Endless are more powerful that should be a given.
So that’s how it is… alright, I understand now
 
Back
Top