Why would a developer state that a laser based attack is light speed, if they aren’t referencing it being a light speed laser. They don’t need to say every little detail of thought to make it clear why they write the things they write. If I write a light based weapon in my story obviously I’m going to think it moves at the speed of light. But if I contradict that on accident, then I’ve contradicted my statement and feat and it is unusable.
Because they did, it doesn't matter why, they did and so it is.
"ive contradicted it once but it's accurate 99% of the time so that 0.1% of the time is was contradicted means the 99.9% of the other times where it's very clearly a certain thing and follows the rules to that thing suddenly are invalidated".
In that case Link should be 10-B because he's taken fall damage before and that contradicts 99% of his feats above human tier, hell, if this applies to everything, when we downgrading literally every verse on the wiki? Fr once in awhile having feats that aren't on par with the highest feats, example, Goku's been hurt by being slammed into a wall before even in Blue, I guess anything above 9-B is contradicted and thus moot.
Hell, the fact you are, quite literally, arguing that they intended it to 100% be a real laserbeam, kinda ***** your whole argument up in the first place, if you're unironically arguing it's outright meant to be a lightspeed light-based laserbeam, which follows the rules 99% of time except in one minor exception, we're going to take the very blatant intention and 99% of the time over the 0.1%.
This isn’t a 0.1% contradiction. This is one of the four largest properties of light being contradicted hard.
That only happens 0.1% of the time and follows said four rules, even the "rule" being contradicted, the other 99.9% of the time. It's not even one of the four rules being contradicted outright, there's context behind why it even happens in the first place (and again, I dont think you can even deflect this beam with wood, only the other exploding attacks).
Like my dude, you're unironically saying **** it adhering to every single rule we have, **** developer intent, and **** a straight-up speed of light statement irrespective of the other things, because there's gag and a gameplay mechanic.
Like bruh.
Actually stop using the wood argument, it isn't worth more over the, well, literally everything else and a explicit speed of light statement that would stay regardless of if it's real light or not.
At least argue something that isn't concrete like it simply being an outlier for Link or some shit, at least then I could understand but trying to say this much overwhelming evidence and a hard statement (that would stay regardless of if it is or isn't light) ain't it chief.
