- 2,677
- 780
btw, they dropped Garuda in Legends Revive, it's again confirmed that he punches at the speed of light not once, but twice
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Fist of the North Star General CRT
- Thread starter Silvervigilant
- Start date
- Status
- 3,974
- 5,813
So would it be SOL or FTL FOST?
- 2,677
- 780
FTL, Garuda is fodder
- 3,974
- 5,813
Nice
Also since I’ve started to read the series and Raoh is becoming one of my favorite characters, where does he end up for the new tiers?
- 3,974
- 5,813
That I knew lol, but would he scale to FTL then?
- 18,727
- 12,988
Using the scaling @Twellas made:
Pre-Seals, Pre-Awakening 30% Kenshiro=the Hokuto Ryuken statement, this is because he outright tanked a blast from Kaioh's Matouki, which was, in turn, stated to be able to perform the Multi-Continental feat
Kaioh>Pre-Seals, Pre-Awakening 100% Kenshiro, it's fairly self-explainatory, Kaioh stomped him
Hyoh with his Matouki>=Kaioh via reasons I've explained above
Pre-Seals, Post-Awakening 30% Kenshiro>Matouki Hyoh as I've shown above, which means that the Awakening procedure is at least a 3.3x boost to power, as Kenshiro went from being Weaker than Kaioh while at 100% to being superior to Hyoh, who is equal if not stronger than Kaioh, while at 30%
Post-Awakening Hyoh>Matouki Hyoh>=Kaioh, as Hyoh went through the same awakening as Ken, which means that he should have received the same boost
Pre-Seals, Post-Awakening 30% Ken>=Post-Awakening Hyoh
So, it ultimately goes like this
Pre-Seals, Pre-Awakening 30% Ken (Scales to the Multi-Continent statement)<3.3x<Pre-Seals, Pre-Awakening 100% Ken<Kaioh<=Matouki Hyoh<at least 3.3x<Post-Awakening Hyoh<=Pre-Seals, Post-Awakening 30% Ken
So, Pre-seals, Pre-Awakening 30% Ken = 849.677 petatons
Pre-Seals, Pre-Awakening 100% Ken = 2.832 exatons
Pre-Seals, Post-Awakening 30% Ken >= Post-Awakening Hyoh which is (10/3) times above Matoki Hyoh due to unlocking his full potential, putting it at 9.44 exatons.
Post-Seals, Post-Awakening 100% Ken = (10/3) times Post-Awakening 30% Ken, which equals 31.4695 exatons (Moon Level).
The only Moon Level people are Post-Awakening 100% Kenshiro and probably Post-Awakening 100% Kasumi Kenshiro. Just those 2.
- 2,677
- 780
literally 0 speculation about the numbers, we are presenting the bare minimum multipliers
- 18,727
- 12,988
The only "debateable" one is for Hyoh's unlocking potential, and even then @Twellas has already stated why he believes it is a similar multiplier to Tenryu Kokyu Ho in terms of its power multiplier.
- 2,677
- 780
It's not even that "I believe" it's comparable to Tenryu, it's shown, Ken at 100% is weaker than Kaioh, then he gets the awakening boost and he's stronger than a guy who is equal to Kaioh while at 30%, it's extremely straight forward
- 168,537
- 77,323
Can somebody write a post with easy to understand (but sufficiently thorough) explanations for the multipliers, including exactly what all of them are based on, so I can call some other staff members to help take a look at this please?
- 18,727
- 12,988
@Twellas can do a much better job of this than I can.
- 2,677
- 780
Tenryu Kokyu Oh boosts Ken's power by 3.3 times, we know this is due to explicit statements from Ken himself that his base uses 30% of his power while Tenryu Kokyu Oh allows him to achieve 100%. This is already accepted by the wiki.
when it comes to the Awakening multiplier, it's directly derived from Tenryu Kokyu Oh: Ken fights Kaioh while at 100% and gets stomped
Hyoh is presented, and he's shown to be equal if not superior to Kaioh, he's stated to have the same aura as him and Kaioh considers him to be superior to post-awakening Kenshiro, who Kaioh himself deemed "a worthy opponent", now, while Kaioh is wrong in thinking so, it doesn't matter to our scaling, since the most important point is the fact that he considered himself to be relative to post-awakening Ken while he considers Hyoh to be decisely superior, meaning that Kaioh considers Hyoh to be at least as strong as himself.
Ken ragdolls Hyoh while using 30% of his power (We know for a fact that he's only using 30% because he has his shirt on, going Tenryu is consistently shown to bust it up)
TL;DR: Pre-Awakening 100% Kenshiro got stomped by Kaioh
Post-Awakening 30% Kenshiro stomped a guy equal to Kaioh
Seems like a very straight-forward multiplier, a direct application of an already consolidated multiplier
Now, Hyoh goes through the same process, we know it's exactly the same because we are told so, on top of Hyoh and Ken being blood brothers, as such, it's more than fair to assume that Hyoh received the same power boost due to it, after which, he's shown to be equal (if slightly weaker) to 30% Kenshiro (He doesn't have a shirt here, but only because one of Hyoh's attacks destroyed it, you can clearly see that he never powers up)
TL;DR: Hyoh's Awakening should grant him a boost equal to Ken's due to the process being the exact same
- 168,537
- 77,323
@Promestein @SomebodyData @Dragonmasterxyz @Celestial_Pegasus @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Ogbunabali
Would any of you be willing to help evaluate this please?
- 18,727
- 12,988
And now after what @Twellas said, some scaling values:
849.677 petatons: Pre-Awakening 30% Ken
2.832 exatons (via 3.33x multiplier): Pre-Awakening 100% Ken, Kaioh, 30% Hyoh
9.44 exatons (via a 2nd 3.33x multiplier): Post-Awakening 30% Ken, 100% Hyoh
31.4695 exatons (via a 3rd 3.33x multiplier): Post-Seals 100% Ken
As for Raoh, he can either scale to pre-awakening Ken, or if we use the 2100 meter cloud-splitting calc that is 1/220th of a second, he can upscale from the 3.117 petaton result to be baseline multi-continent level at 30%. Or we can use both and put him at "At least High 6-A, likely higher"
Kasumi Kenshiro probably scales to Ken himself.
849.677 petatons: Pre-Awakening 30% Ken
2.832 exatons (via 3.33x multiplier): Pre-Awakening 100% Ken, Kaioh, 30% Hyoh
9.44 exatons (via a 2nd 3.33x multiplier): Post-Awakening 30% Ken, 100% Hyoh
31.4695 exatons (via a 3rd 3.33x multiplier): Post-Seals 100% Ken
As for Raoh, he can either scale to pre-awakening Ken, or if we use the 2100 meter cloud-splitting calc that is 1/220th of a second, he can upscale from the 3.117 petaton result to be baseline multi-continent level at 30%. Or we can use both and put him at "At least High 6-A, likely higher"
Kasumi Kenshiro probably scales to Ken himself.
- 5,554
- 2,329
I'm fine with the 3x multiplier in general. But if the OP is trying to propose using a calced value and multiply it for the baseline, and then using that multiplied value and adding another multiplier on top of it, that would be a hard no from me.
- 2,677
- 780
why?
- 5,554
- 2,329
Because we don't stack multipliers like that. That goes against so many of our standards and it results in highly inflated statistics.
- 18,727
- 12,988
But the multipliers are stated in the story, and it doesn't make sense to keep a bunch of people at the same level (oh, sorry, "far higher than each other but with same power values") when there are clear reasons for there to be multipliers.
Isn't the speed for DBS characters just a bunch of stacked multipliers?
Isn't the speed for DBS characters just a bunch of stacked multipliers?
- 2,677
- 780
so, basically because it's "against the rules" and not for any fault in the reasoning, right?
- 18,727
- 12,988
Like I said, we do exactly that for the DBS speed, since I see a bunch of multipliers there, so it's kind of baffling that DBS gets to stack multipliers but not FOTNS.
- 168,537
- 77,323
- 11,141
- 14,180
Our policy on multiplier stacking is that the total increase that is happening after stacking, would require as much burden of proof.
For example, if you have an accepted multiplier of x5 and x10, and you want to stack them together to make it x50, then the burden of proof you need to prove such a number also becomes much higher.
If there is nothing to substantiate that the increase of x50 took place, then it wouldn't work. In DB's case, I think the argument was that since speed and AP are increased by the same amount, even though they have no speed feats, they had AP feats that backed up such increases nicely.
- 11,141
- 14,180
From the Multipliers page:
If multiple multipliers are to be stacked, that are used upon each other, the evidence for the end result is equal to the total multiplier applied to the best feat. That means that if, for example, a character has a times 10 multiplier and later on gets another times 50 multiplier, than the evidence necessary to use both multipliers to get a statistic, is like that of a times 500 multiplier, as the best feat would be increased by a factor of 500 in that case.
In regards to multiplier stacking one should also pay attention to whether a multiplier applies to the strength of the character without the other multipliers applied or with the other multipliers already applied.
If multiple multipliers are to be stacked, that are used upon each other, the evidence for the end result is equal to the total multiplier applied to the best feat. That means that if, for example, a character has a times 10 multiplier and later on gets another times 50 multiplier, than the evidence necessary to use both multipliers to get a statistic, is like that of a times 500 multiplier, as the best feat would be increased by a factor of 500 in that case.
In regards to multiplier stacking one should also pay attention to whether a multiplier applies to the strength of the character without the other multipliers applied or with the other multipliers already applied.
- 11,141
- 14,180
For me to be able to give any thoughts, I would need:
1. The accepted multiplier.
2. The total multiplier that comes from stacking.
3. The base feat upon which the total multiplier is being used on.
4. And any evidence that can fulfill the burden of proof needed to accept the total multiplier.
- 18,727
- 12,988
@Twellas can do a much better job with that than I can.
- Status
