-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
FIRE FORCE FIRST DISCUSSION RULE.
- Thread starter PrinceofPein
- Start date
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
- Thread starter
- #42
- 7,726
- 2,965
you don't count me
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
you never said whether you disagreed afaik, if you did it must have been under the pile of bs you've written that i skim-read
- 21,489
- 30,820
not yet.
adding this over 1 person's incompetence isn't fair
adding this over 1 person's incompetence isn't fair
- 7,726
- 2,965
ok
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
So 7-4 in favour of disagree, can this be closed or shall we wait for more input?
- 31,574
- 28,025
This rule seems fine to me.
- 11,559
- 10,996
We should make a rule about when a debate rule should be added
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
- 7,726
- 2,965
- 21,489
- 30,820
It's based on staff votes, not regular votes
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
its in crt, rather than staff discussion so i assumed it'd be based on regular votes. Regardless the community seems steadfast against it, so i hope that isnt just completely ignored when making a decision
- 21,489
- 30,820
All CRTs are staff based, its just that the regular votes influence the staff's decision
Staff discussion is specifically only staff can talk
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
Staff - based yes, but staff-only no. I dont think ive seen a single crr here where blue name votes were irrelevant in the grandscheme and that only staff votes were.
Regardless, its clear that the community is more against the rule then for it, so hopefully that will sway the desicion here, as this will effect the community more then anything/anyone else.
- 21,489
- 30,820
You've probably been on the wrong CRTs then, since every single thread on this wiki requires a majority staff vote for it to go through
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
perhaps
Seems exceptionally unfair, but ig thats how it works here. Ig ill hope the staff makes the right descision.
- 15,454
- 15,480
Yeah, the OP is fine
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
Staff only agreement: Confluctor, Damage, DemonGodMitch
Staff only disagreement: Tempest, Planck, Zara
User only agreement: Pain
User only disagreement: LeSupremeKing, Life_Of_King, Arceus, Jibz, Nierre, Majinere, Alexander, Superstar, WanderingGecko, PowerToScale, ArnoldStone
I’ll stop counting now, just wanted to tally it up rq. (Yes i know staff votes are what ultimately matter, but its good to see the majority of regular users are disgreeing). I’ll stop counting votes for now untill many have passed without it being counted
Staff only disagreement: Tempest, Planck, Zara
User only agreement: Pain
User only disagreement: LeSupremeKing, Life_Of_King, Arceus, Jibz, Nierre, Majinere, Alexander, Superstar, WanderingGecko, PowerToScale, ArnoldStone
I’ll stop counting now, just wanted to tally it up rq. (Yes i know staff votes are what ultimately matter, but its good to see the majority of regular users are disgreeing). I’ll stop counting votes for now untill many have passed without it being counted
Last edited:
- 9,389
- 6,692
What?
Ridiculous
Staff, please check these threads individually before making your judgments
Why should we make a discussion rule over several Q&As and two CRTs made by the ONE person many of us trolled a week ago for making multiple Universal Naruto CRTsto the point of deletion cuz I can't even find it anymore?
And bro @Alexander discuss your plans in the relevant discussion forums before making a CRT about a character with a massive rating than what they already have on their respective pages.
I Disagree lol
Ridiculous
Staff, please check these threads individually before making your judgments
Why should we make a discussion rule over several Q&As and two CRTs made by the ONE person many of us trolled a week ago for making multiple Universal Naruto CRTs
And bro @Alexander discuss your plans in the relevant discussion forums before making a CRT about a character with a massive rating than what they already have on their respective pages.
I Disagree lol
WanderingGecko
Username Only- 1,151
- 334
Disagree, its kinda absurd to ban this just because of a few threads
- 2,435
- 1,164
I disagree with banning. At best it's 3 CRTs that haven't even been properly discussed, with evidence supporting it.
-The first thread was basically, everyone just saying "no" with no real reason to it and having it closed.
-The second thread had no real traction and nothing was discussed.
While both are badly formatted, that is no reason to impose a rule to ban the discussion either, especially since the individual who made is someone relatively new to the VSBW community (NOV 21 they joined).
-The third thread is just a question on why Shinra isn't immeasurable and explaining why such things that they think would make him don't.
-The Forth thread is the only decent thread that presents itself properly and had traction, with most people being neutral and everyone saying to wait for the series to end.
This is not rule-worthy, especially since there are no actual requirements for rulemaking either. Plus, this will lead to more people making rules for lesser things to keep their scaling for characters, like this.
-The first thread was basically, everyone just saying "no" with no real reason to it and having it closed.
-The second thread had no real traction and nothing was discussed.
While both are badly formatted, that is no reason to impose a rule to ban the discussion either, especially since the individual who made is someone relatively new to the VSBW community (NOV 21 they joined).
-The third thread is just a question on why Shinra isn't immeasurable and explaining why such things that they think would make him don't.
-The Forth thread is the only decent thread that presents itself properly and had traction, with most people being neutral and everyone saying to wait for the series to end.
This is not rule-worthy, especially since there are no actual requirements for rulemaking either. Plus, this will lead to more people making rules for lesser things to keep their scaling for characters, like this.
- 4,882
- 2,518
I feel like this is a rushed decision as two of these threads were questions, while the rest just stopped being talked.
People should be let to debate it as long as its not going out of the borders of our current rules plus it didn't went ballistic like other verse threads (don't want to give names but you know them). If Fire Force reaches close to these then sure put a rule but till then its a rushed idea.
People should be let to debate it as long as its not going out of the borders of our current rules plus it didn't went ballistic like other verse threads (don't want to give names but you know them). If Fire Force reaches close to these then sure put a rule but till then its a rushed idea.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
- Thread starter
- #69
Well I guess we can wait and see if people will keep on making such threads.
Since we have got 3-3 in staff votes
Since we have got 3-3 in staff votes
- 585
- 314
The problem isn't even people making these threads. They can make it if they really want to, they just need to argue it really well. Discussion rules should only ever be made if a topic has been argued so much that there is almost no room for new argumentation for that topic.
Jibz
He/Him- 3,111
- 2,505
I get that staff votes is what matters most, but if the community vote (outside of staff) is literally 1 agree to 11 disagrees, this clearly is too controversial of a crt to be applied. Like nobody outside of the crt creator and a handful of staff actually want this change.
Edit: 1 user agree and 12 user disagrees
Edit: 1 user agree and 12 user disagrees
Last edited:
- 7,726
- 2,965
Yeah, but at least that was a thousand times worse than this, I literally don't see the point in that, plus everyone takes me for a troll, when I'm serious. If I was going to tell jokes I would, but when I'm serious, I'm serious
Arkenis
They/Them- 17,242
- 7,963
necro is like 5 months, you're fine.
