Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They replied to a disagreement comment with ^^ = They disagree as well. They also liked Plancks comments its not hard to see the intention- They also said they disagree on discord.No other message
"You destroyed/blew up Uranus". doesn't have that many interpretations.We are already hypothesizing. I said we have no idea about the scene and it could be exaggeration or metaphor. Weren't Aizen's statements about ichigo also rejected as "metaphors"? I think the same is true here, and it seems inadequate even for "possibly".
I think I have to say it again, so I will write briefly and go. I believe that 5-A should remain as "Likely".
No other message
I say that if we are not shown the scene, there may be an analogy or an exaggeration. Necati, you have destroyed uranus! It's being tried, and there's no other support. That's why it's divided into possibilities. I'm giving you an example that happened in vsb. Aizen fails to perceive Ichigo and asks, "Has he moved from me to the higher dimension?" and these statements are accepted as "metaphor" and rejected. In my opinion, the same should be the same here."You destroyed/blew up Uranus". doesn't have that many interpretations.
Dude I summarized the logic of "metaphor".Not sure if you can use other verses to prove your point but Idk.
The fact that this is a whataboutism aside, no ******* shit Aizen isn't a 4-dimensional being. We see him on screen and he's visually not that at all.I say that if we are not shown the scene, there may be an analogy or an exaggeration. Necati, you have destroyed uranus! It's being tried, and there's no other support. That's why it's divided into possibilities. I'm giving you an example that happened in vsb. Aizen fails to perceive Ichigo and asks, "Has he moved from me to the higher dimension?" and these statements are accepted as "metaphor" and rejected. In my opinion, the same should be the same here.
Dude, I did a metaphor sampling. I didn't say it was exactly the same thing. I said that there is a "metaphor" effect in the same situations.The fact that this is a whataboutism aside, no ******* shit Aizen isn't a 4-dimensional being. We see him on screen and he's visually not that at all.
Here, we get a statement that's not contradicted whatsoever and even has an off-screen explosion effect for good measure. They are not at all comparable situations.
Aizen is a metaphor because "higher dimension of power" can legitimately mean multiple things. Actual physical transcendence, a massive power gap, a different state of being etc.Dude, I did a metaphor sampling. I didn't say it was exactly the same thing. I said that there is a "metaphor" effect in the same situations.
Well, I told my friend that it is possible to enter "possibly" according to the convenience of the current system. But when he reminded me of previous discussion topics, seemed inadequate.Aizen is a metaphor because "higher dimension of power" can legitimately mean multiple things. Actual physical transcendence, a massive power gap, a different state of being etc.
That is not the same here. Can people please stop spamming "it might be a metaphor" at the simplest statements when they have no metaphorical meaning to begin with?
I've disagreed and honestly, don't feel like going back and forth on this for that long. Call other staff to check this out if need be.
You say there is nothing on the screen. if you decide by looking at the screen same goes for Necati. We don't even see Uranus disappear. I agree with Yaozin.The fact that this is a whataboutism aside, no ******* shit Aizen isn't a 4-dimensional being. We see him on screen and he's visually not that at all.
Here, we get a statement that's not contradicted whatsoever and even has an off-screen explosion effect for good measure. They are not at all comparable situations.
Theres no metaphors here its just plain old "Blowing Up/Destroying" something unlike dimensional things that go deeperYou say there is nothing on the screen. if you decide by looking at the screen same goes for Necati.
We get a statement. On this wiki, if it isn't directly contradicted then that's usually good enough. That we hear an explosion only exacerbates this.You say there is nothing on the screen. if you decide by looking at the screen same goes for Necati. We don't even see Uranus disappear. I agree with Yaozin.
That was our bad theres no sound but the shake is there, I still agree with Planck.That we hear an explosion only exacerbates this.
They are on space how can they hear an explosion??It is claimed that there was an explosion without even a sound.
Theres a shake. The thing stabilizes then suddenly starts to shake again after the explosion.The situation is contradictory and there is not even a shake-up
Thats how it is on the profile. This CRT is to remove it completely so yeah"Likely 5-A" should work from what I read.
0 continuity. But if the verse does have a continuity then the feat can be brought into question.
You should call other staff to review this.
Currently not staff
Ah, my bad. Dunno how I missed that.Currently not staff
I debunk for the last timeA statement is fine, you just won't get an actual number behind the feat besides baseline since it's off screen. If the cartoon has no real continuity, then it's fine since everything is random. But if the verse does have a continuity then the feat can be brought into question.