- 17,935
- 15,521
If needed, I can try.
Also, here's two more common feats I think could be handy.
Latter isn't evaluated, former is.
Also, here's two more common feats I think could be handy.
Latter isn't evaluated, former is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, I dunno if I'm gonna be uniforming the way ratings are shown, that is a lot more work than I initially realized and I don't think it's worth itAnyway, does anybody mind adding these calculations to the page?
Let's see if we can get some more evaluations for these.
We don't have one for that yet; I've worked on it, but it isn't very accurate.What about running up a wall
Now, have we made a decision on this?
DT's version is the one to choose.Now, have we made a decision on this?
Great! Now we just need a volunteer to add it to the page. Who'd like to do it?
DT's version is the one to choose.
DontTalk is almost always very reliable, yes.
Did anyone else wanna offer to add this to the page?Great! Now we just need a volunteer to add it to the page. Who'd like to do it?
I can do it. Where should I add the feat in the Common Feats page?@Jasonsith @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan @KLOL506 @Damage3245
Would any of you be willing to help out with improving on the page please? The progress here has been far too slow.
I think it'd be best to add it in the Speed Feats section.I can do it. Where should I add the feat in the Common Feats page?
Which feat?I think it'd be best to add it in the Speed Feats section.
snip
To rearrange the order of feats displayed.What do you intend to do here exactly, Jasonsith?
We can add that into the big pool first. Anyone doing this within 12 hours or I will after such.
Whatever happened to the guy tho.This might not be the thread for this, but has anyone considered making a calc for breaking bricks?
A calc does exist of the feat but it was made by Buttersamurai, who is infamous for wanking his calcs while he was around, so the validity of this particular calc is dubious.