- 276
- 23
https://preview.redd.it/kyqsmhmuuso...77590fae2693c990b25a4ae2&app_web_view=android
Can you check this out.
Can you check this out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Beerus, Goku and anyone who can destroy it. Also the DB verse might be bumped to 6-d and zeno as well. No idea if it's useful though.I have a question, would anything even benefit from this 5-D proposition?
That's something different I think. The image I posted.Ok can someone give a brief rundown of what the 5-D timeline stuff is about and it's purpose?
Not accepted here
How so? It's pretty self explanatory.Not accepted here
Any reasons why notNot accepted here
Well the premise was that the timelines in DB operate on a higher time axis from the lower spacetimes, spanning 4D objects instead of 3D objects. With there being proof that the spacetimes in DB make their own separate time, hence, being on a separate axis. The pendulum room, since every macrocosms should have one, it's not the source of temporality for the entire multiverse, which would contradict everything.Ok can someone give a brief rundown of what the 5-D timeline stuff is about and it's purpose?
This isn't even Tier 1 anyway. Buzzwords alone don't make the tier.
Uh, not sure the exact justifications, but i would assume it's because there's no evidence of it being another spatial axisAny reasons why not
It says dimensionally transcendent? What do you mean Buzzwords don't make the tier?This isn't even Tier 1 anyway. Buzzwords alone don't make the tier.
...And? Do we have further context as to what that entails. Is there anything showcasing them treating the universe as infinitesimal or insignificant in scope to that degree?It says dimensionally transcendent?
So you are saying because they haven't explicitly shown it that this statement can be thrown away. I mean dimensionally transcendental is pretty clear. Transcending on it's own isn't a good word but dimensionally transcendent is another thing entirely....And? Do we have further context as to what that entails. Is there anything showcasing them treating the universe as infinitesimal or insignificant in scope to that degree?
Tiers don't happen cause of just mentioning "transcendent" in a sentence.
But with this they could be 6-D. Imagine da possibilities. Though given Planck's stance it's a nothing burger with mac sauce.Low 1-C timelines are way more solid
Yes? We don't just give tiers to statements without further context unless they're very self-explanatory. Say, "He destroyed all of space and time!", "The Realm sprawled out to infinity!", etc.So you are saying because they haven't explicitly shown it that this statement can be thrown away. I mean dimensionally transcendental is pretty clear. Transcending on it's own isn't a good word but dimensionally transcendent is another thing entirely.
Eh I already got one downvote from you. Only one more is needed so I ain't standing on a good ground to do it. Thanks for at least preemptively sparing me from doing the task though.Yes? We don't just give tiers to statements without further context unless they're very self-explanatory. Say, "He destroyed all of space and time!", "The Realm sprawled out to infinity!", etc.
"Dimensionally transcendent" can mean anything from merely being from another dimension in the sense of separate space-times, being Tier 1 or even being intangible or formless.
But eh, try your luck if you feel strongly enough about it.
I was trying to explain this too DBZ Fans on Battle Wiki Reddit,Yes? We don't just give tiers to statements without further context unless they're very self-explanatory. Say, "He destroyed all of space and time!", "The Realm sprawled out to infinity!", etc.
"Dimensionally transcendent" can mean anything from merely being from another dimension in the sense of separate space-times, being Tier 1 or even being intangible or formless.
But eh, try your luck if you feel strongly enough about it.
Well, different people have different standards. There is nothing wrong with taking things at face value, within reason of course, but that's just not in line with this site's standards for better or for worse.I was trying to explain this too DBZ Fans on Battle Wiki Reddit,
Well, different people have different standards. There is nothing wrong with taking things at face value, within reason of course, but that's just not in line with this site's standards for better or for worse.
A piece of fiction isn't going to go out of its way to make sure it meets our exact requirements for things like this, so it's up to us to create a fair yet thorough set of standards to define
Go to your room you have school tomorrowYes, sir..
No I dont...Go to your room you have school tomorrow
Akira Toriyama in Respect for the GodsThis isn't even Tier 1 anyway. Buzzwords alone don't make the tier.
.....Is this supposed to change something?
No, it's just to add that the Gods are of utmost importance, Did you watch DBS? In the anime, Zen'ō and the Daishinkan seeing the entire Universe in the form of fiction, in addition to demonstrating the Daishinkan by observing the entire Universe 7 in a species of jellyfish.....Is this supposed to change something?
Lmfao. You're actually serious.No, it's just to add that the Gods are of utmost importance, Did you watch DBS? In the anime, Zen'ō and the Daishinkan seeing the entire Universe in the form of fiction, in addition to demonstrating the Daishinkan by observing the entire Universe 7 in a species of jellyfish
Why exactly do you say that? Same existence physically? Zen'ō lives on a plane above all 12 Universes, I in no way see Zen'ō and Daishinkan having the same existenceLmfao. You're actually serious.
Yes, I watched the anime. No they don't see universes as fiction. Ffs, they're physically the same level if existence as Goku.
For me this is exactly what seeing the verse in a form of fiction, where they are in a dimension inaccessible for anyone to beIf the gods see the mortal realm as fiction then Supreme Kai did a self insert lmfao
I mean, from what I understand Botamo’s justification across the two mediums is different. Manga Botamo is just stretchy and Anime Botamo transfers damage to another dimension and all attacks in that Dimension are nullified. The former probably wouldn’t have invulnerability, just resistance to blunt force, and the latter would have invincibility (via Damage Transference.)Should botamo have invulnerability to ki attacks and physical attacks?
That.. is literally fcking insane, i wonder how he can be beat without existence erasure.I mean, from what I understand Botamo’s justification across the two mediums is different. Manga Botamo is just stretchy and Anime Botamo transfers damage to another dimension and all attacks in that Dimension are nullified. The former probably wouldn’t have invulnerability, just resistance to blunt force, and the latter would have invincibility (via Damage Transference.)