Dragon Ball immeasurable Rule

[Bernkastelll]

Discussion Rules

VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...

vsbattles.fandom.com

• Do not attempt to upgrade the speeds of Dragon Ball Heroes and Dragon Ball Xenoverse characters to infinite or immeasurable. It has been established in our Speed standards that timeless voids are inapplicable for evaluating speed levels, and the cast has consistently been affected by natural flows of time, so they at best have Time Travel or Time Manipulation.

the main issue with this rule is because it is worded in a way that doesnt allow any kind of possible upgrade of their speed that can happen with ongoing series, as it says that do not attempt to upgrade it to infinite or immeasurable, so, I guess it should be better worded

 

[Bernkastelll]

Bump

 

[StekFence]

Agreed. If they happen to get a legit inf or imeas feat, this rule should not apply

 

[EmilioRory10]

it doesn't need to change, it accurately represents how this wiki treats DBH anyway

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

i think it stems from people being sick of debating over vague panels and scans. Sick of debating an extrapolation from only a panel statement with no other context. Sick of debating DB in general becuase it delves into chaos.

Just my guess

I think the only way you will get any of that overturned is a clear cut, straightfoward, no BS, no bush beating, no vague guesses, no A > B > C > D scans.

What you need is something very literal. Something you can't possibly lowball. Something so clear cut so straightfoward that you can't argue aganist it.

Which odds are.. thats unlikely..

Again just my opinion. I won't say im right.

 

[Nierre]

it doesn't need to change, it accurately represents how this wiki treats DBH anyway

 

[sanicspood]

he aint wrong

 

[Delta333]

and the cast has consistently been affected by natural flows of time

How can being affected by time be contradicted to immeasurable speed?

 

[GilverTheProtoAngelo]

IG Thanos can timestop Immeasurable Abstracts in comics. We accept that as very potent time stop not a contradiction to immeasurable speed.

 

[Delta333]

Exactly, this reason is too damn wrong

 

[chosen]

Layers of time stop is an thing
Like how in fiction time manipulation can work in timeless places i don't see the issue if it works on immeasurable speed beings

 

[Maskofthedragon]

Discussion Rules

VS Battles Wiki is a site where the members attempt to index the statistics of characters across different fictional franchises. These efforts lead to much discussion about certain feats, statements and calculations regarding their validity, reliability, etc. However, certain topics keep popping...

vsbattles.fandom.com

• Do not attempt to upgrade the speeds of Dragon Ball Heroes and Dragon Ball Xenoverse characters to infinite or immeasurable. It has been established in our Speed standards that timeless voids are inapplicable for evaluating speed levels, and the cast has consistently been affected by natural flows of time, so they at best have Time Travel or Time Manipulation.

Are there any characters with infinite+ speeds that aren't affected by the flow of time, 99% of the time?

 

[Saiyan40009]

so far all threads dragon ball infinite speed always presenting scans and if it does not get it, it is because the standard is almost always changed to say that they present scans without context is a bad accusation

think it stems from people being sick of debating over vague panels and scans. Sick of debating an extrapolation from only a panel statement with no other context. Sick of debating DB in general becuase it delves into chaos.

Just my guess

I think the only way you will get any of that overturned is a clear cut, straightfoward, no BS, no bush beating, no vague guesses, no A > B > C > D scans.

What you need is something very literal. Something you can't possibly lowball. Something so clear cut so straightfoward that you can't argue aganist it.

Which odds are.. thats unlikely..

Again just my opinion. I won't say im right.