CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
Weird to make a new rule about the COT while we were having a discussion about it being Low 1-C lmao
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Games - Discussion Rule about Low 1-C
- Thread starter StrymULTRA
- Start date
- Status
- 5,703
- 3,230
It's about COT being Low 1-C
- 15,126
- 6,901
- Thread starter
- #43
Can we drop calling Ultima's name here and just focus on the rule ffs? It's not like he'll be commenting soon anyways. He is important, but he is as much as every other staff member.
It was already closed.
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
that's what i said lol, but it looks like this is a spite rule tbh lol
- 5,703
- 3,230
No one here cares for accuarcy, it seems. All of us are biased.
Some in DB's favor, others against for their own reasons
- 2,127
- 1,726
Yeah a discussion rule seems unwarranted.
- 5,703
- 3,230
- 12,116
- 6,084
But it's not exactly in the team discussion lol
- 9,982
- 10,819
@StrymULTRA wtf it's not in the staff discussion bruh 
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
- 3,227
- 3,556
Sorry Strym, but this is absolutely dumb.
Hard disagree FRA.
Hard disagree FRA.
- 5,703
- 3,230
I know the OP doesn't like DB for their own reasons, or at least is biased in regards them having a certain rating.
Being biased is normal, I'm also biased in favor of certain things. It's human nature.
I know Strym never claimed to be a DB fan
But I don't think creating a rule against this is worth it.
In the future there might appear new arguments for a Low 1-C upgrade, doing this is not fair tbh.
Being biased is normal, I'm also biased in favor of certain things. It's human nature.
I know Strym never claimed to be a DB fan
But I don't think creating a rule against this is worth it.
In the future there might appear new arguments for a Low 1-C upgrade, doing this is not fair tbh.
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
- 2,127
- 1,726
makes sense.
- 15,126
- 6,901
- Thread starter
- #56
Guys, I propose the rule against ONLY THESE TWO ARGUMENTS, as they're proposed from years with no variation.
Heroes is an ongoing series, so new stuff can come, but as for now, the arguments are the exact same.
I'm not blocking Tier 1 CRTs to begin with, only for these two.
Heroes is an ongoing series, so new stuff can come, but as for now, the arguments are the exact same.
I'm not blocking Tier 1 CRTs to begin with, only for these two.
- 5,703
- 3,230
Again, you just don't like DB that much. Just admit it.
Your not a fan, and there is nothing nothing bad on that.
- 1,010
- 712
Isn't it kinda dumb...creating a rule to stop debating...in a place that its main core, foundation and attraction is debating?
I mean, new arguments can arise, previous one can be revised, creating a ban rule seems....how to say this lightly? Stupid af, dumb, useless, idiotic, goes against what this wiki stands for.
I mean, new arguments can arise, previous one can be revised, creating a ban rule seems....how to say this lightly? Stupid af, dumb, useless, idiotic, goes against what this wiki stands for.
- 3,780
- 4,080
Ok guys for one….stfu about this Ultima debate. Save it for the actual upgrade thread.
Now as for this thread in particular.
The last thread that was made was not rejected like was claimed. Instead it was temporarily closed and is awaiting more input. So trying to put a discussion rule on an ongoing topic is a very premature thing to do because said discussion hasn’t even ended yet.
Disagree with this thread.
Now as for this thread in particular.
The last thread that was made was not rejected like was claimed. Instead it was temporarily closed and is awaiting more input. So trying to put a discussion rule on an ongoing topic is a very premature thing to do because said discussion hasn’t even ended yet.
Disagree with this thread.
- 1,010
- 712
You can't just say "These arguments can be used". Because 1- These arguments can be revised. 2- The 'debunks' can be debunk.
And it just discourages people from engaging with the verse.
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
The first one was already dismissed of how the fact there is a rule about the real world and nobody used that argument. The COT had some arguments similar to what we upgraded characters like Archie sonic, they had statement of Extra dimension worlds we accept it to 5D because of the fact they used beyond space time. this is quite bias at the highest order.- By yeat
- 5,703
- 3,230
Btw, Ultima wants to comment:
- 628
- 1,157
Good, this thread is baseless and should now be closed.
- 15,126
- 6,901
- Thread starter
- #65
Well, I'll ask to someone's to close this for the time being then.
My bad guys
My bad guys
- 5,703
- 3,230
Smart move
- 15,126
- 6,901
- Thread starter
- #67
- 9,982
- 10,819
It is.
- 5,703
- 3,230
- 12,116
- 6,084
Gotta admit it, he really doesn't like DB, on Zeno'oh's CRT he sulked just because Zamasu got a new upgrade, then when he made his CRT to downgrade the verse, scorned others, cursing like an idiot and calling my thread shit, really I agree with that, anyone DB fan who is against him, he treats it like this, it seems like he has a past tragic about DB
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
CraigTucker
He/Him- 494
- 266
Sounds like a zastando moment
- 12,116
- 6,084
Yes lol
- 167,679
- 76,256
I personally think that a new discussion rule seems reasonable if this reasoning keeps being rejected in multiple threads.
@Elizhaa @Theglassman12 @DemonGodMitchAubin @SamanPatou @Maverick_Zero_X @LordGriffin1000 @Starter_Pack @Sir_Ovens
What do you think?
@Elizhaa @Theglassman12 @DemonGodMitchAubin @SamanPatou @Maverick_Zero_X @LordGriffin1000 @Starter_Pack @Sir_Ovens
What do you think?
- 167,679
- 76,256
- 12,116
- 6,084
The last CRT was not rejected, bro, we are waiting for Última comment on, we're just waiting, so we closed another CRT, several people were unnecessary derailment.
- 3,486
- 5,161
Bro the last thread wasn’t rejected plus some staff indirectly agreed like Glass since they said if the crystals are shown to be universes (they were timelines so it’s even better) that it’s grounds for Low 1-C CoT the thread was closed due to Luffy requesting it to be closed since Ultima said he’d evaluate it CoT was not rejected and is still ongoing we are waiting for Ultima
- 5,703
- 3,230
Ant, I think it would be better if you close this thread.
Ultima PM'd me now and he's asking what's happening with these thread.
Besides, he's interesting in replying here:
Could you open it please?
- 5,703
- 3,230
- 5,703
- 3,230
The thread linked below, needs to be opened again, and this one closed.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
