I think it makes sense, but using some guides and Toei's mention of the verse easily picks up 2-C, as having Heaven Universal in size, as well as Hell being declared bigger than Heaven itself, there's also quote from the afterlife being transcendental, but I don't know.
why would we do that when more staff agree with the downgrade? i don't understand the logic
crazy, I can very well use that same argument to say that countries have another space-time
Well, technically Medeus and I outrank them, and the difference in numbers is very small.
I think the point more so is the fact that they have a calendar that is compatible with every universecrazy, I can very well use that same argument to say that countries have another space-time
calendars are created by the Gods, like some countries that change calendars, this is not proof
well, I think it makes sense, so what you suggested should be applied, and close this topic.
Well, content moderators do not have content revision thread evaluation rights, only bureaucrats, administrators, and thread moderators do, and the former two types have a bit more voting power, although not overwhelmingly so, but the point was that content revision threads need a clear staff consensus to be applied, and we do not have that here.
Right, but think about it. If a calendar works no matter what universe you are in, then they would seem to be temporally very similar. That’s why calendars can work no matter what country you are in.
I disagree, if we use the same premise we can level up several verses and downgrade just with that, think about it, would you like your verse to be downgraded in a logic like that? Well, I disagree.
As long as it's about specific verse and not about wiki policies such as tiering system change. Vote values are considered equal among all.
Yes, our biggest authority is that we act as a final safeguard against potentially dangerous policy changes for our entire wiki, but this is a regular content revision thread. We have much less authority regarding such issues.
No, bureaucrats still have a bit more voting authority than administrators, who have a bit more voting authority than thread moderators, but not overwhelmingly so. I think that we added specifications about this to our official rule pages recently.
In the sense that time flow its so low that time stands still, at least for Goku's perspective.
Uh I see, I was unaware then...
Does what you or I want really matter in this case? it leading to downgrades isn’t relevant to whether or not the reasoning is correct.
Wrong. Completely wrong, admins have higher evaluation rights in terms of higher tiers for example. I made this clear-cut in the recent staff thread. Bureaucrats do not have a drastically high value votes but definitely not equal to any staff role.
I was only responding to the question.
but the reasoning is wrong, that's all.
If it’s not in the macrocosm then by default it should still be in the timeline because even if it’s not In the macrocosm there’s nothing suggesting it’s not within the timeline but that doesn’t even matter since it’s in the World Beyond/Universe section meaning it can allly to the macrocosm or timeline so if Macrocosm is contradicted it’s the timeline and there’s no contradictions to it being inside the timeline but not in the macrocosm you have to prove it’s outside the timeline because there’s nothing suggesting it is
the time flow of both living universe and otherworld are different but there’s not explicit statements of them being seperated by space and time like in the toeiverse which is why it’s easier for Goku to use ssj3 in the afterlife than the living universe but both pretty much have the same cosmologies toeiverse just has better statements for it being seperate space time continumms
He is new and have no debating or arguing skill and is much less aware of the standards we have, so it's only upto you that you find what he said satisfactory or not or else you'll have to leave it to staff as he won't be able to debate (highly unlikely you'll get what you are asking for). So you'll have to wait for if other supporters have something to say on calendar stuff.
Nice.
Is there anything that can be done with this?
So you agree?
that is contradicted in several moments, goku said that time doesn't exist, where did you get time slow from it?
well the guide in question is not talking about the multiverse/timeline, so this point is kinda moot
no, goku said that there is no time in the otherworld, idk how can anyone interpret as different times, he said that there is no time at all, which is contradicted numerous times in the series
This is so authoritarian
That evidence means nothing.......Other evidence is rejected by wiki long ago. There is no new counter evidence.Thank you for helping out with evidence.
Dread you don't know the context of DB. The profile Acknowledges this.
If it’s not in the macrocosm then by default it should still be in the timeline because even if it’s not In the macrocosm there’s nothing suggesting it’s not within the timeline but that doesn’t even matter since it’s in the World Beyond/Universe section meaning it can apply to the macrocosm or timeline so if Macrocosm is contradicted it’s the timeline and there’s no contradictions to it being inside the timeline but not in the macrocosm you have to prove it’s outside the timeline because there’s nothing suggesting it is
You need to show in which section/title of the topic this sub space being talked in before deciding it by yourself. If it's the part of macrocosm or universe 7 section/title in the book than that's contradicted, if it's timeline then you have to prove or show it's in the timeline section/title.
I think it's good to comment, we've already debated with everything we had and you with your arguments
It's from the Interval Specials that aired in place of the actual DB Super Chapters while it was on hiatus in it's slot in V-Jump.
