Does Acausality Type 5 grant passive immunity to Conceptual Causality Manipulation?

[UnknownZem]

Hello everyone,

Regarding the mechanics of Acausality Type 5 (existing completely outside the law of cause and effect), does a character with this profile passively possess immunity or resistance against Conceptual Manipulation that specifically targets the concept of causality itself?

In other words, if an opponent can manipulate the abstract concept of "Cause and Effect" on a Tier 1 scale, can they still affect an Acausal Type 5 being? Or does Type 5 naturally bypass conceptual enforcement because the character exists fundamentally outside of any causal framework, whether abstract or physical?

I would appreciate a clear consensus on this specific interaction. Thank you in advance!

 

[Impartial_Euler]

No immunities just an interaction barrier.
Be it physical attacks or hax based(including conceptual manipulation, causality manipulation), they all have a consequence. Consequences being something Acausality type 5 is immune to.

Hit a block and it breaks, apply a force and it accelerates. Destroy a concept or redefine it, the objects cease to exist or change to fit the new description.

Causality manipulation is even worse in this regard. All it does is change how it works, like changing the rules of a game while an Acausal doesn't play by the rules. Whether the rules change or don't exist at all has no 'consequence' on them.
An example, apply a force on a block and a concept ceases to exist while all the objects participating in it change. Redefine a concept and a block accelerates while objects participating in the concept cease to exist.

Simply put no matter what is done there will be no influence on them.

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

I mean tbf, the interaction barrier is, in of itself, an immunity in this case, but generally what was said above is more or less the case

 

[Hecky2222]

Gotta specify what is Tier 1 Scale cuz obviously non 1-A Ac5 can't resist 1-A Conceptual Change