• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Discord (IDW) upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
1) I meant when he is depowered.

2) The chaos magic seems to be his power as an embodiment of chaos, as far as I have understood.
 
That seems fine to me at least.
 
Antvasima said:
1) I meant when he is depowered.
2) The chaos magic seems to be his power as an embodiment of chaos, as far as I have understood.
Considering this involved the fundamental nature of his being it may have been one of his inherent abilities as the principle and embodiment of chaos. His chaos magic is usually used for reality warping. Meanwhile things such as chaos empowerment, his reliance on acting chaotic, and his ability to stay conscious despite his brain being; for all intents and purposes. destroyed, are all merely the result of him being the spirit of chaos. All of these are unrelated to his magic as they activated when his magic was disabled. As a result of this relationship, I would imagine changing the nature of his being is one such ability.

I mean maybe? If magic is life force like it is said to be, then he's losing a lot more than basic magic.
 
Antvasima said:
That seems fine to me at least.
Ok so abstract exisrence type 2 is a no go, you did say type 8 immortality makes sense. Can Discord also get conceptual manipulation since he re-wrote the nature of his being down to the concept he embodied? If agreed then the question becomes: What type?
 
Probably type 4, but I am the wrong person to ask.
 
Antvasima said:
Probably type 4, but I am the wrong person to ask.
Is type 3 an option? He refers to himself as a force of nature at one point. No doubt he's refering to the fact that he embodies chaos. There's also the fact that his chaos can control all of reality which might support type 3.
 
I do not know. As I said, I am the wrong person to ask.
 
Hello, I didn't read most of this but came to disagree with something that came from the thread. The type 8 Immortality.

Existing in many place is, at best, Nigh-Omnipresence. To have type 8 Immortality one needs to depend on stuff to be immortal or resurrected. To give an understandable analogy, you exist in all your body, but you're not immortal as long as every part of it exists. Same with everything you can image that exists in many places at once, it can take very, very little to destroy stuff.

Existing in many place like Discord does could give him many powers, especially with how the statement is both true and poetic, but type 8 Immortality isn't necessarily one of them and needs genuine evidence to be legit.
 
Speculation and headcanon. At minimum we should say that just killing Accord should get rid of the rest.
 
>Accuses me of Speculation and headcanon

>Says killing the original will get rid of the rest.

You've got absolutely no evidence for this whatsoever.
 
Image every Nigh-Omnipresence and Omnipresence user with a visible body having type 8 immortality via existing, that would be nuts.
 
Thanos's recent key has Omnipresence and can put his face on stuff, which, again, it's not type 8 immortality. It's speculation and a headcanon that needs more context to be anything.
 
A question if I may:

Was this additio discussed and cleared by the staff before it was added, and if so, can somebody please explain the context of why it is a universal feat to conquer a reality and create lots of portals to other ones?
 
And for the record that's not Accord "putting his face on stuff" those are the individual Accord's within the ponies coming out of their own free will.
 
Not gonna argue anything, but "speculation and headcanon" are used for abilities all the ******* time on this wiki.

Kirby's resistance to EE is one of them as the noted example given is super vague as ****.

Maybe we need more clarification on things rather than assumptions if you want to argue speculated abilities don't count.
 
Lightbuster30 said:
And if they can manifest of their own free will, then why would that not used as a form of ressurection if one of them dies?
Eficiente said:
Speculation and headcanon. At minimum we should say that just killing Accord should get rid of the rest.
@Foxthefox Iirc you were a trouble maker, so please consider not saying things that have nothing to do with anything in an already altered CRT.
 
Eficiente said:
Lightbuster30 said:
And if they can manifest of their own free will, then why would that not used as a form of ressurection if one of them dies?
Eficiente said:
Speculation and headcanon. At minimum we should say that just killing Accord should get rid of the rest.
Good. Now prove it. Post some real evidence or drop it. You cannot objectively prove that killing the main one will kill the others. You accuse me of headcanon, and yet here you are doing it even more than me.
 
Lightbuster30 said:
And for the record that's not Accord "putting his face on stuff" those are the individual Accord's within the ponies coming out of their own free will.
Given how any form of Omnipresence works, saying both is good and it still doesn't matter.
 
He made his beliefs clear from the beginning but keeps saying them again as arguments. If I didn't know him, I would say he tries to keep serious users away by making the thread overwhelming.
 
Oblivion Of The Endless said:
Again, its you that needs to prove that he can resurrect from it
Just being able to exist anywhere doesnt grant you immortality
Yet again, if they can manifest of their own free will then that should happen. Answer me this: If they can manifest themselves of their own will, then what stops them from manifesting if the original dies? They are clearly able to manifest any time they want and did do so indicating they can do so without the individual. Yet again I ask: What stops them from manifesting without the original when they can and have done so by themselves previously? It just seems nonsensicle for them not to be able to when they did just that in the comic.

The only argument I've seen against this is the headcanon that killing off the real one will kill of the others, which cannot be proven.
 
Antvasima said:
A question if I may:

Was this additio discussed and cleared by the staff before it was added, and if so, can somebody please explain the context of why it is a universal feat to conquer a reality and create lots of portals to other ones?
Darkanine got angry at me for undoing the edit, so I would appreciate the help.
 
Antvasima said:
Antvasima said:
A question if I may:

Was this additio discussed and cleared by the staff before it was added, and if so, can somebody please explain the context of why it is a universal feat to conquer a reality and create lots of portals to other ones?
Darkanine got angry at me for undoing the edit, so I would appreciate the help.
Are you talking about the Eris edit? I'm not 100% certain it was discussed.
 
Okay. Darkanine accused me of breaking the rules for undoing it due to finding it suspicious:

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3606972

It isn't like I changed any statistics though. I just didn't think that this addition seemed to fit as a justification.
 
Antvasima said:
Okay. Darkanine accused me of breaking the rules for undoing it due to finding it suspicious:
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3606972

It isn't like I changed any statistics though. I just didn't think that this addition seemed to fit as a justification.
Yes I know. You said you deleted it because:

A question if I may: Was this addition discussed and cleared by the staff before it was added.
If the revision was made and no one discussed it then I guess you were in the right? Idk. I don't remember a discussion on it.
 
Okay. I don't want any drama though. Would somebody else be willing to remove it?
 
Honestly, it cannot be definitively declared that killing someone who has the power to exist anywhere/everywhere will completely get rid of them. It depends really on how their omnipresence functions. In one case if it would be completely dependent on their original existence and conscience then yes that would do the trick. On the other hand, if their physical body, or "original" manifestation, is irrelevant and unecessary to a greater encompassing presence, then no, killing just their "original" bodies/manifestations won't work at all. According to what Light said, the latter circumstance seems to be the case for Discord/Accord. Also keep in mind that the latter situation does not really denote immortality as the actual encompassing presence is not harmed at all, just the manifestation that got killed. So I don't agree with Light's statement about Discord's immortality unless he can further elaborate on his argument or I am missing something in this.

EDIT: It seems that Discord/Accord, as an apparently all-encompassing presence, exists alongside the ponies' desire of the very concepts of Chaos/Order. This may grant him Type 8 immortality since he cannot be destroyed as long as those concepts AND the ponies desires for them exist. So I take back my statement on not agreeing with Light.
 
ÆONS said:
According to what Light said, the latter circumstance seems to be the case for Discord/Accord. Also keep in mind that the latter situation does not really denote immortality as the actual encompassing presence is not harmed at all, just the manifestation that got killed. So I don't agree with Light's statement about Discord's immortality unless he can further elaborate on his argument or I am missing something in this.
In theory though, would Discord in your opinion be able reappear from within someone who desires his concept? Or would we be dealing with someone separate and thus not actually reviving?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top