DBS: Android 17 upgrade

[Sera_EX]

Come on now, I don't think she's trying to masquerade the outlier in glitter and pass it off as At least 3-A to supplement Low 2-C. She views and analyzes things differently than we do. Which is fine, honestly.

 

[Aeyu]

Because the thing with him fighting Goku and the 4 others at full power is "ehhh," and could hint he's higher than 3-A, but the safe end is preferred. That's why no Low 2-C, also.

 

[Kepekley23]

She doesn't want to hide the outlier. But her logic hides an outlier if taken at face-value.

@Aeyu

But fighting SSJB Goku is a Low 2-C feat. There's no way around it. If he fought a Low 2-C, he'd be a Low 2-C.

But, if he isn't Low 2-C and the feat is an outlier, what else would he be? Fighting 4-5 3-As isn't "At least 3-A".

 

[Sera_EX]

If the writers stop having every gimmicky character seem more impressive than they really are...

 

[Aeyu]

The thing is, when Anilaza has legitimately no other relevant feats, it stands to reason that his main feat would be taken into consideration and not immediately treated as an outlier, especially when nothing really contradicts the feat.

 

[Kepekley23]

Your logic ends in Low 2-C Anilaza.

 

[Aeyu]

Previously @Kep, Ever put a good reasoning as to why this was possible. I still think At least 3-A is safer.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

>Low 2-C Anilaza again.

Notto dissu shito age.

Seriously, the only reason he is At least 3-A is because it was agreed Low 2-C was an outlier so a bone was thrown at the fans. That isn't fair or professional.

 

[Kepekley23]

"At least 3-A" is hiding the outlier. I've explained why many times.

Downgrade him to 3-A.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Alfready is.

 

[Aeyu]

You haven't explained why it's supposedly an outlier.

He has legitimately nothing contradicting him being able to take on 4 3-A's and 1 Low 2-C, especially when the 3-A - Low 2-C gap isn't treated as infinite.

 

[Kepekley23]

I've explained why your logic makes him Low 2-C, which you continuously deny even though you admitted it a few posts back. I've also explained why "At least 3-A" makes no sense. If he took on a Low 2-C, he'd be Low 2-C. There's no such thing as "At least 3-A is safer", because that's hiding the outlier.

If you disagree with Low 2-C, then he is 3-A.

 

[Kepekley23]

Also, since everyone agreed with Low 2-C 17 not being a thing, should this be closed?

 

[Aeyu]

But you still haven't explained why that's an outlier.

 

[Kepekley23]

I don't actually have to, because your logic suggests Low 2-C Anilaza, which you disagree with yourself.

 

[Aeyu]

W-what kind of argument is that? .-. Is that condescension?

 

[Kepekley23]

I don't have to debunk it when your own argument technically already goes against itself.

But see, if I have to, I can just link the old Anilaza thread, where it was agreed to be an outlier.

 

[Aeyu]

It was agreed that these characters were At least 3-A before too. Recently, in fact. So why don't we go over it in an unbiased way (I don't even care for the character)

 

[Kepekley23]

I'm not being biased or condescending.

It was agreed, but the profile is now back to 3-A, so that's no longer relevant.

 

[AKM sama]

C'mon, let's end this already. It's fine the way it is.

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Let's end this thread rightly o3o

 

[Kepekley23]

Anilaza is technically a derail, but Low 2-C 17 isn't getting accepted, so I don't know.

 

[Antvasima]

So, what should we do about Android 17?

 

[Therefir]

Nothing, he is a walking outlier.

 

[Super_Saiyan_God_Julian]

Pretty much what Therefir said.

This should be closed.

 

[Antvasima]

What do the rest of you think? Should we close this?

 

[Matthew_Schroeder]

Yes, we should.

 

[ALRF]

Am with Matt on this

 

[Antvasima]

Okay.