• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Cross-Dimensional Vs Low Multiversal Range

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah I'm fine with that change of wording.
 
I also think that it looks good, and Eficiente seems to have accepted it as well. Should I apply the changes now?
 
I guess so. Wok and Prom did disagree with this before, so the thread should maybe be left open after that.
 
Eficiente said:
I guess so. Wok and Prom did disagree with this before, so the thread should maybe be left open after that.
The changes look fine; more or less,I agree on the point toward maybe leaving the thread open after the changes were made.
 
Okay. I will apply them then.
 
Should we change the wording from "attacks that are able..." to "attacks and abilities that are able..."?
 
Antvasima said:
Should we change the wording from "attacks that are able..." to "attacks and abilities that are able..."?
Yes, I think it would be better to do so.
 
What is left to do here?
 
If all the changes have been applied, then nothing is left.
 
Okay. I will close this then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top