- 2,650
- 467
Honestly, I think Gan should just get a straight rating. The logic I used to defend that rating (which is what I argued based on the composition of the void) was extremely flawed, just like my downgrade to the DS which turned them from Possibly 1-A into High 1-B.
Frankly, all I see for the Tower, at the most, is At least High 1-B due to that conceptual transcendence of size itself (does dimension not relate to size, being likened to cardinal infinites on this Wiki?) but I definitely am going to try and defend 1-A Gan, which Matt previously argued for as well.
And well, it relates in that if the King was on one of the highest conceptual levels of the Tower, and the destruction of the Big Combination affected him, that High 1-B should be a given. Subtracting infinity from the infinite still equals infinity.
And also, not to be "that girl," or anything, but maybe you or someone else should bring that up? (I certainly won't, because I'm not going to be seen as trying to incite discord again) Because currently, all that it's defined as is being unlimited by any dimensions.
Frankly, all I see for the Tower, at the most, is At least High 1-B due to that conceptual transcendence of size itself (does dimension not relate to size, being likened to cardinal infinites on this Wiki?) but I definitely am going to try and defend 1-A Gan, which Matt previously argued for as well.
And well, it relates in that if the King was on one of the highest conceptual levels of the Tower, and the destruction of the Big Combination affected him, that High 1-B should be a given. Subtracting infinity from the infinite still equals infinity.
And also, not to be "that girl," or anything, but maybe you or someone else should bring that up? (I certainly won't, because I'm not going to be seen as trying to incite discord again) Because currently, all that it's defined as is being unlimited by any dimensions.