Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,676
- 14,049
Type 1 Conceptual Manipulation is defined as:
The first definition is "Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern." It requires that these concepts are independent from the part of reality they govern, necessitating that these concepts can't govern other concepts or themselves.
The second definition is "In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of their area of influence, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept." This merely requires that an alteration of the objects which participate in the concept does not alter the concept; that only alteration of the concept itself will alter the concept.
These definitions are different as the first one requires that concepts can't govern themselves or other concepts, while the second one doesn't.
This ends up being relevant for matches once series with type 1 concepts invoke concepts such as "time", "space", and "causality". The first definition would imply that no concepts participate in any concepts, including themselves, making interacting with them a more impressive feat. While the second definition does not imply that.
However, it includes two different definitions, which would imply different things for series that involve this type.1. Independent Universal Concepts: Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern. These concepts shape all of reality within their area of influence and at whatever level that area exists in, and everything in it "participates" in these concepts. For example, a circular object is circular because it is "participating" in the concept of "circle-ness". In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of their area of influence, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept.
The first definition is "Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern." It requires that these concepts are independent from the part of reality they govern, necessitating that these concepts can't govern other concepts or themselves.
The second definition is "In this way, the alteration of these concepts will change every object of the concept across all of their area of influence, while the opposite wouldn't affect the concept." This merely requires that an alteration of the objects which participate in the concept does not alter the concept; that only alteration of the concept itself will alter the concept.
These definitions are different as the first one requires that concepts can't govern themselves or other concepts, while the second one doesn't.
This ends up being relevant for matches once series with type 1 concepts invoke concepts such as "time", "space", and "causality". The first definition would imply that no concepts participate in any concepts, including themselves, making interacting with them a more impressive feat. While the second definition does not imply that.