- 6,489
- 1,704
- Thread starter
- #441
Does the wiki treat reactions and perception speed differently?I'm rereading the CRT for BB and this one. I'll put my conclusion later on.
Still want that God blitzing 8th sense user btw when you got the time
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does the wiki treat reactions and perception speed differently?I'm rereading the CRT for BB and this one. I'll put my conclusion later on.
Still want that God blitzing 8th sense user btw when you got the time
Has it been pointed out that it needs the 9th Sense to be at least FTL according to Episode G and Episode G Requiem?tbf, nothing suggests he was blitzed and Aiolos was amped
but I'm not sure if I actually understand the immeasurable speed argument
that's not even true, Aiolia has 3 separate FTL feats in GHas it been pointed out that it needs the 9th Sense to be at least FTL according to Episode G and Episode G Requiem?
yes. somehowDoes the wiki treat reactions and perception speed differently?
I'm not getting the difference here. Can you actually perceive something without processing any part of ot?
Yeah, with Dunamis, ergo 9th sense.that's not even true, Aiolia has 3 separate FTL feats in G
oh? Aiolia has dunamis in chapter 4 does he?Yeah, with Dunamis, ergo 9th sense.
I'll come back to this later. Irl stuffyes. somehow
Like DDM said
Perceiving all of reality is more akin to cosmic awareness rather than Immeasurable speed. only when it is shown that there exists a higher temporal dimension that introduces complex Time will it grants immeasurable speed (need confirmations from the verse to exist) and we seem to share the same thought on how it could just be a Range and such
furthermore, in BB's case, she was able to travel at any point in time in the multiverse/possibilities
Something I haven't seen in Saint Seiya.
the massive difference between the two is for BB's case she has more feat that further supports immeasurable speed.
this was taken from her profile but upon reading the CRT there is more to it than what the profile says and the more i read on that CRT the more this 1:1 comparison becomes bleak
Yes, he always had part of the Keraunosoh? Aiolia has dunamis in chapter 4 does he?
Actually tho, the dead 8th sense users in the classic do have time travelfurthermore, in BB's case, she was able to travel at any point in time in the multiverse/possibilities
oh, then that could work as more evidence and preferably be added in the reasonings then.Actually tho, the dead 8th sense users in the classic do have time travel
It's not a translation errorYes, he always had part of the Keraunos
But if I'm not mistaken it's a translation error this from chapter 4, but not that it would prevent him from achieving this before. Since he always had the Keraunos.
But Zeus dunamis is his ability to wield lightning, that the Keraunos of Ceos (his actual full dunamis):It's not a translation error
and I wouldn't equate a divine weapon to dunamis. It was made very clear the Titans dunamises (dunamii?) were sealed to Tartarus, that's why Aiolia and Shura lost Coeus' and Kreios' dunamii at the end of G.
Unless you're arguing Aiolia was born with access to Zeus' dunamis and not just his ability to wield lightning?
idk if that's entirely true, Zeus also has the ability to manipulate nothingness and chaos.But Zeus dunamis is his ability to wield lightning, that the Keraunos of Ceos (his actual full dunamis):
Regarding Tier 1, do you also disagree? Because there are already a lot of arguments against it and it seems controversial.@Dereck03 sorry for the wait, been busy with some exams.
I disagreed with the type 5 Acausality, the Type 2 NEP with information aspect, Dimensional Manipulation, and Type 1 Concept hax.
nothing in the type 5 Acausality arguments mention the characters become an unchangeable entity because they’re beyond causality, which is needed for the new standard.
NEP type 2 has nothing about being neither existing nor nonexistent, and nothing about information is stated to be nonexistent.
Dimensional Manipulation has no backing on it being dimensional manipulation beyond a statement of someone adapting to a dimension, which is just Reactive evolution, not DM.
Type 1 concept hax I don’t see any statements on Karma existing independent of reality so I’m asking for statements.
The "arguments" are mostly misinterpretationsRegarding Tier 1, do you also disagree? Because there are already a lot of arguments against it and it seems controversial.
Multiple staff have given their opinion on tier 1Regarding Tier 1, do you also disagree? Because there are already a lot of arguments against it and it seems controversial.
I'm going to do all the hax in a new thread. I'm developing it at the moment. It'll probably be a bit before I release bitill send you a link when I do.I don’t care about the tier 1 stuff
After re-checking a bit the discussion i think the same tho i alrd disagreed with NEP 2, but will wait if the new thread address something new..@Dereck03 sorry for the wait, been busy with some exams.
I disagreed with the type 5 Acausality, the Type 2 NEP with information aspect, Dimensional Manipulation, and Type 1 Concept hax.
nothing in the type 5 Acausality arguments mention the characters become an unchangeable entity because they’re beyond causality, which is needed for the new standard.
NEP type 2 has nothing about being neither existing nor nonexistent, and nothing about information is stated to be nonexistent.
Dimensional Manipulation has no backing on it being dimensional manipulation beyond a statement of someone adapting to a dimension, which is just Reactive evolution, not DM.
Type 1 concept hax I don’t see any statements on Karma existing independent of reality so I’m asking for statements.