- 12,302
- 11,259
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Collapsing Star Roaring Cannon correction
- Thread starter ZillertheBucko
- Start date
- Status
- 13,903
- 5,405
- Thread starter
- #202
Chariot is the only one who I’ll put up with this from
I am going to upgrade something later because you are pissing me off
I am going to upgrade something later because you are pissing me off
- 8,845
- 9,506
Yo man chill.
- 13,903
- 5,405
- Thread starter
- #204
- 15,654
- 13,161
- 13,903
- 5,405
- Thread starter
- #206
so here's my proposal, we just take every single possible end, and just weed out the ones that are most likely to be true, and then add all the ends wth acceptable validity onto the page as a range
as far as I know, there is no rule against doing that with vague feats like this, and this specific scenario would be one that warrants it most, given that we agree that it is impossible to narrow it down to one end.
this is the only good solution to this problem, since the way I see it, arguing to narrow it down to a single end is pointless, and there will always be an equally valid interpretation
for example
"far higher with collapsing star roaring cannon (here are links to the possible ranges for it)"
as far as I know, there is no rule against doing that with vague feats like this, and this specific scenario would be one that warrants it most, given that we agree that it is impossible to narrow it down to one end.
this is the only good solution to this problem, since the way I see it, arguing to narrow it down to a single end is pointless, and there will always be an equally valid interpretation
for example
"far higher with collapsing star roaring cannon (here are links to the possible ranges for it)"
- 8,997
- 9,718
To be honest, the original proposal of just removing the current CSRC calculation on Boros' page sounds simpler. Also, it was agreed to by multiple users and staff, so I guess it can be applied already?
I don't want another page or more of this discussion when it's practically supposed to already be concluded
- 4,716
- 4,210
I agree just remove the calc
Put "Far higher with CSRC" and call it a day
Put "Far higher with CSRC" and call it a day
- 31,380
- 27,651
I also agree with this.
- 8,997
- 9,718
Since most users and staff agree to it, if there's nothing else, I'll apply the changes and this can be closed
- 12,302
- 11,259
Yes. Let's close the kitchen.
- 13,903
- 5,405
- Thread starter
- #213
Boros was real
like guys he actually happened
like guys he actually happened
- 15,654
- 13,161
Yeah, till ya killed him
- 10,317
- 11,829
Closing
- Status
