- 1,708
- 956
Did you see the part where I explained that his absorption also targeted the 5D space, and not just the multiverse? That has yet to be responded to, which is why I’m confused.You want me to explain why counter-arguments that I've decided don't hold up against the main premise.... don't hold up against the main premise? Like, look at my initial post I guess? This may come as a surprise to you but one can look at both sides and of an argument and just agree with another's stance on the matter.
My main stance was that nothing solidly supported the erasure scaling to his base statistics, especially when the energy absorbed was a whole level of infinity lower than the scale of the erased structure. That hasn't changed for me.