• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Calculation Evaluations (New forum)

 
Diamond_Drone said:
Priority 1: Scales to basically everyone

Verse: Shock
Click to expand...
Diamond_Drone said:
Priority 2/3: Scales to certain Characters or a group of Characters
Verse: StarCrafts
Feats:
Click to expand...
Bump
 
Tie said:
Priority: 3
Verse: One-Punch Man / Saitama
Calculations: Recalculation Durability of Kid Saitama

Recalculation because The old calculation used pulverization But the walls weren't crushed into powder. But it just collapsed.
Click to expand...
This recalculation is unnecessary. We use pulverization in feats like this due to the fact that if it were V. Frag or normal Frag, the debris formed from the crater would be on the ground or in the crater, which it isn't.

Even if pulverization was denied for this feat later on, the values in the calc are very weird. You used the thickness of a wall as the depth of the crater, but that doesn't make sense to use. If the crater was as thick as the wall, it would be ahole, and not a crater. The original calc's depth (using the average thickness of a child Saitama's age) is much safer and makes much more sense.
 
Tie said:
Priority: 3
Verse: One-Punch Man / Saitama
Calculations: Recalculation Durability of Kid Saitama

Recalculation because The old calculation used pulverization But the walls weren't crushed into powder. But it just collapsed.
Click to expand...
WRONG. It did not collapse. It got pressed in. That's textbook compressive strength.

Pulverization uses compressive strength (Realistically speaking tho pulverization would be a lot higher IRL but its formula, powder factor, is inapplicable to non-rock stuff like metals so we use compressive strength as a low-ball because it exists for majority of materials), we do not use yield strength for feats like this and using ultimate tensile strength makes absolutely no sense at all because tensile strength is pulling strength.

Not only that, the curvature is way too extreme for that building wall to be that much thinner than Saitama's own chest. Also, like Kachon said, you're using both 10 inches and that 20 cm wall thickness? That's contradictory in its own right. You can't have a crater depth of 25.4 cm and a wall thickness of 20 cm, there'd be a hole in it.
 
KLOL506 said:
WRONG. It did not collapse. It got pressed in. That's textbook compressive strength.

Pulverization uses compressive strength (Realistically speaking tho pulverization would be a lot higher IRL but its formula, powder factor, is inapplicable to non-rock stuff like metals so we use compressive strength as a low-ball because it exists for majority of materials), we do not use yield strength for feats like this and using ultimate tensile strength makes absolutely no sense at all because tensile strength is pulling strength.

Not only that, the curvature is way too extreme for that building wall to be that much thinner than Saitama's own chest. Also, like Kachon said, you're using both 10 inches and that 20 cm wall thickness? That's contradictory in its own right. You can't have a crater depth of 25.4 cm and a wall thickness of 20 cm, there'd be a hole in it.
Click to expand...
Worse still, even the pixel-scaling is completely wrong. Saitama's head is not straight up, it's straight up drooping downwards.
 
Priority 2: Scales to a decent number of characters

Verse: Saint Seiya

Summary of Calc: Gemini Saints Galaxian Explosion Subatomic destruction of the whole milky way galaxy - recalc'ed. This number is complete and utter insanity. I tried my best to understand the instructions i was given so i wouldn't be surprised if i messed that up somewhere.

vsbattles.fandom.com

Gemini Saints Galaxian Explosion

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ZawierJ
  • Locked
Fairy Tail FTL+ Downgrade
2 3
Replies
97
Views
9K
KingTempest
KingTempest
rpmblack
IASP Calculations Discussion Thread
Replies
10
Views
480
rpmblack
rpmblack
Napoleondevious
help with formula for Volcanos and tsunamis
Replies
0
Views
341
Napoleondevious
Napoleondevious
Damage3245
  • Locked
Issues with Nichirin's Calculation (One-Punch Man)
Replies
6
Views
2K
Damage3245
Damage3245
TheRustyOne
  • Locked
My Hero Academia: The Final Smash Calculation
2 3
Replies
85
Views
7K
TheRustyOne
TheRustyOne
Back
Top