the goat has arrived. the yap in this blog is no more
This debunk is flawed. Let's use inductive reasoning to present an argument as to why it's incorrect.
Logical Argument 1: If a valid source affirms that the windows are indeed windows and are connected to "every" available space-time, then we must conclude that if the burrow exists independently in every universe, or if it's referring to a singular burrow, the conclusion still stands that Cat Blanc can affect these universes.
Logical Argument 2: The reason for this can be directly supported by the most recent media, specifically the London Special. In the London Special, several things are revealed. First, we know that when a wish is made, it destroys and erases the timeline, as we saw at the end of season 5. In the London Special, we observe that when a wish is made, a window disappears, indicating that the timeline has been completely erased. One cannot argue that this happens within the same timeline because, when the villain first makes the wish, the windows are black, showing that that timeline—or "future"—no longer exists. Additionally, trying to go back in time through that window doesn't work either. Each window is a "snapshot" of a timeline, which can be rewound, fast-forwarded, or stopped. If a window turns black (or, in Cat Blanc's case, static), that means the timeline has been destroyed, and the connection is lost.
A wish from Gimmi destroys the past, present, and future. When a wish is made, it rewrites everything that exists, creating a new reality, which inherently changes all three temporal states. If everything were part of the same timeline, why wouldn't all the portals disappear? The answer is simple: because they are different time-spaces. This argument has been affirmed by the official source regarding the burrow and by Ladybug herself. This also aligns with the "streams = timelines" analogy, which refers to the semantic implications of what a timeline is. In this sense, we can equate things X and Y because they share similar properties—specifically, their general appearance. We use terms like "flowing," "stream," and others that are commonly associated with both rivers and timelines.
To clarify, if you have a car with four doors and two people with keys, this analogy refers to the burrow as the car and the portals as the destinations the car can travel to, not whatever you may be suggesting.
Within the narrative, this interpretation makes much more sense than the one you're trying to argue. Another point to consider is that the alternative interpretation of the burrow would limit Cat Blanc to being just 2-A. If you believe that when Bunnyx says "all of time," she is referring to the entirety of the Miraculous Ladybug multiverse, then Cat Blanc's ability to affect that "connector" would scale him to that level. However, there is no evidence that there is more than one burrow, right? Well, sort of. The current interpretation is that all we know is that there exists a burrow within the main Miraculous universe. But if that's the case, why can't the burrow travel to other universes? The answer is simple: there exists a burrow in each universe, which would explain why they cannot do what I just mentioned. But that's an argument for another day.
Now, here's the current understanding of how time works within the verse.
The Burrow is the connector of all time within a universe.
The totality of time flows to it and exists within it.
The Burrow's time is "distinct" from all the other timelines that exist within a universe.
Within the verse, we directly see that altering time affects portals and vice versa.
If Event A exists within a window and then Person A changes Event A with an ability, causing it to become Event B, this does not mean that Event A never happened. Instead, it means that Event A now exists differently from Event B. For these two distinct, tangent events to coexist, a separate time-space is required for them to exist independently. Both tangent events cannot exist within the same temporality, as that would create a contradiction.
For example, if Ladybug dies (let's take the wish as an example and assume she doesn't get saved due to plot reasons, and we can also place a ghost in her place if necessary), then that window is gone. Everything before it still exists, but when Ladybug fails multiple times, the windows that allowed her to travel to those places turn black. This indicates one thing: timelines within the verse operate on a principle known as root-cause-contingency (RCC). RCC refers to the concept where timelines branch off from the main timeline, but when the main timeline is destroyed, the others are also destroyed. This is because their fundamental existence depends on the existence of the main timeline, even though they are distinct time-spaces. This process explains the events we see in the movie.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In conclusion i have provided arguments and reasoning behind why what your sayng is wrong and the correct interperation of the burrow.
gg ez no re
www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com
You said that he claimed something, that's indirect speech but that's still a form of quoting. Anyways we've made our points clear.
