Bye-bye Multiversal Miraculous

[Hixkaryana]

Last one says and I quote "a large amount that is impossible to count" only infinite or higher values are impossible to count.
And by the same dictionary on the word infinite says "very great; impossible to measure" which is basically the same thing.

infinite adjective - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes | Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com

Definition of infinite adjective in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more.

www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com

Do a CRT to downgrade almost every verse because they use the word infinite.

That's literally not even true lmao, in this Wiki the word countless (which has the same definition) consensually represents a finite amount.

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

That's literally not even true lmao, in this Wiki the word countless (which has the same definition) consensually represents a finite amount.

Countless means too many to count which is different from impossible to count.

 

[Hixkaryana]

Countless means too many to count which is different from impossible to count.

Too many to count=impossible to count. Also why have we moved on to semantics when the issue isn't even about that..

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

Too many to count=impossible to count. Also why have we moved on to semantics when the issue isn't even about that..

You started on semantics and definitions. And this is useless, if you wanna make a thread so do it, but your arguments are horrible even more now talking about the meaning of infinity.

 

[Hixkaryana]

You started on semantics and definitions. And this is useless, if you wanna make a thread so do it, but your arguments are horrible even more now talking about the meaning of infinity.

My sole argument is that we have no proof of the contents of the Guardian's book, which makes your argument unreliable and a fallacy.

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

My sole argument is that we have no proof of the contents of the Guardian's book, which makes your argument unreliable and a fallacy.

No, your argument is that a statement of being infinite doesn't count because you have a vague statement which might or might not mean it's less

 

[Hixkaryana]

No, your argument is that a statement of being infinite doesn't count because you have a vague statement which might or might not mean it's less

Then you might've read with your eyes shut, because I only brought that up because you made a mistake when writing your quote.

 

[Suigetsuhyugs]

Then you might've read with your eyes shut, because I only brought that up because you made a mistake when writing your quote.

That wasn't a quote it was my words. I use "" when I quote

 

[Hixkaryana]

That wasn't a quote it was my words. I use "" when I quote

You said that he claimed something, that's indirect speech but that's still a form of quoting. Anyways we've made our points clear.

 

[TheOrangeGuy09]

When you say “billions of universes,” you're still dealing with a finite number, no matter how large. Even though billions are large, they don’t come close to infinity. If Tikki says “billions of universes,” it doesn’t imply “infinite universes” . Just because billions are part of an infinite set (like how 2 is part of infinity) doesn’t mean billions = infinity. If there were an infinite amount of universes, Tikki would have never said billions, and if there were an infinite amount of universes, Tikki would be infinite years old.

It doesn’t imply infinity, but it doesn’t contradict it as well, thus Gabriel’s statement still has an authority.

 

[Wikisource]

Seems fine.