- 4,108
- 3,129
no? its literally the same my friend, just because it didn't reflect in 4 angles doesn't mean that it didn't reflect
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Bleach- PTS Speed Downgrade
- Thread starter Cyberblader90
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bleach renji abarai
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #682
My issue is more its in the same arc, with the timing not being too far a part. I would agree somewhat if the two were say.. soul society arc and war arc. something like that
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,162
They are different colored beams from different sources. Of course they look different
- 6,229
- 2,653
Reflects, check
Called light, check
Goes on a straight line, check
Burns instead of exploding, check
Also:
"Lasers/light beams are only accepted as real if they meet, at a minimum, a few of these criteria"
- 4,108
- 3,129
there are more than 100 chapters between the 2 occasions, u know that right?
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #687
This diagram will serve as a basis for my point. We agree zabimaru isnt flat, correct? In the case of the star its called diffusion. light exposed to a rigid surface. The issue is the star doesnt follow that. The star seemingly expands out flat style then fades. keep in mind both times it used, the beam is several meters. It should look more like jugram's example.
- 6,229
- 2,653
That's an argument from incredulity
Not to mention this renji is not the same as the one that got stomped
This renji went and trained on the soul kings palace by squad 0 and has no anti-feats
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #689
toaa, as stated by damage and akm, as well as other admins ive seen on the site, those are just non anti feats. it has to be 2 of the primary five conditions
- 6,229
- 2,653
And we already have 2
Reflects and is called light
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #691
i dont think you guys understood this part. Im referring to kubo's depiction of what reflection is and the time frame. nothing else
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #692
We are debating the first point, reflection
- 8,153
- 2,177
Renji has his sword out and beam is sent away according to Mask. This meets the standards of reflection with a metallic weapon.
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,162
No, they prove it “could” be light
- 1,082
- 361
This ***** getting ridiculous.
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #696
small Segway. Something got brought up and being flooded with responses might have made me miss this. Why would renji moving make his blade "clank", if that is before the "swoosh" as Arc said
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #697
Ask an admin regarding that. In this very crt that been stated as wrong more than thrice by admins
- 1,082
- 361
We’re really debating ******* sound effects right now lmao.
- 6,229
- 2,653
Is literaly on the page
Also 1 admin and they are not god nor perfect as all humans they can be wrong too.
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #701
are you going to derail again
referring to silent bob
referring to silent bob
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,162
literally when, also i am quoting the page here. No offense to anyone but what is on the page>word of admin
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #704
"Please note that the opposite of these criteria do not prove a beam is at lightspeed, merely that it could be, should it meet the first list of criteria. "
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #705
Referring to earlier posts by akm and damage
- 6,229
- 2,653
And that is what he said
- 6,229
- 2,653
The word of 2 mods does not change requirement pages
For that they need a thread to change those requirements
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #710
"3"..
Huh
only 2 are on the table
It meets one, and the other is being debated
Anyway
I have to dip for a bit, got to babysit
Huh
only 2 are on the table
It meets one, and the other is being debated
Anyway
I have to dip for a bit, got to babysit
- 1,527
- 855
Furthermore, there are a few criteria which show a beam is NOT real light:
It is shown at different speeds in the same material
It is tangible and can be interacted with physically by normal humans
They do not travel in straight lines (unless you can prove refraction/reflection, see above)
success has none of these
It is shown at different speeds in the same material
It is tangible and can be interacted with physically by normal humans
They do not travel in straight lines (unless you can prove refraction/reflection, see above)
success has none of these
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #712
ill be back in like 2 hours
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,162
have a good day
- 5,659
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #714
That means it lacks those anti feats.
lacking anti feats doesnt mean light speed
be back later
lacking anti feats doesnt mean light speed
be back later
- 1,527
- 855
The beam refracts in a new material, such as a liquid or...
The beam reflects off a material that it can be expected to, such as a non-magical mirror
The beam is called lightspeed by reliable sources
It is stated to be made of photons or light itself, again by a reliable source
It has its origin at a realistic source of light, such as a camera
has 3 of these criteria
The beam reflects off a material that it can be expected to, such as a non-magical mirror
The beam is called lightspeed by reliable sources
It is stated to be made of photons or light itself, again by a reliable source
It has its origin at a realistic source of light, such as a camera
has 3 of these criteria
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,162
It being the opposite is quote "Please note that the opposite of these criteria do not prove a beam is at lightspeed, merely that it could be, should it meet the first list of criteria". We are using these as support feats
- 491
- 120
ALL MATTER creates curvature in space-time. The thing is that it generally requires a lot of mass-energy in one place for that curvature to be noticeable or significant. Gravitational lensing is used in astronomy because of how massive celestial bodies are, from stars to black holes to galaxies.
Just applying E=MC^2 tells all one needs to know about why your specific argument can't work. The curvature caused by 9x10^16 Joules worth of light concentrated in a certain volume is the same as 1 kg of matter within the same volume; 1 ton = 9 x 10^19 Joules; 1000 Tons = 9 x 10^22 Joules, and so on.
Not to mention that any curvature of space-time caused by mass-energy in real life follows the Speed of Causality. If you were to suddenly remove the Sun from the centre of the Solar System, it'd still take 8 minutes for Earth to stop moving along its orbital path and start moving in a straight line. In other words, any curvature of space-time that "persists" even though the energy causing it has already been scattered to the wind i.e. there is no continual source of energy keeping the space warped, is purely for "rule of cool's" sake, thus unquantifiable.
--------------------------
Then there is the fact that no Cero in Bleach has never behaved in any way like natural light. Cero and other spiritual energy-based attacks almost always physically clash with one another in the common Beam-O-War scenario, whereas natural light beams would just pass through each other unimpeded.
Ceros and other reiryoku-based attacks, like Getsuga Tenshou and Quincy reishi arrows, are consistently shown to have a tangible mass to them. They can be physically halted and stopped; they can be redirected by hand; they can be "shattered" and dissipated. The exact opposite of "intangible", as you've tried to claim before.
Similar threads
- Locked
