- 11,506
- 3,074
Light doesn’t cut, explode, or interact with matter. All feats will be a rejected. No exceptions.thats an example
of course other feats where it violates standards and has no way to be proven as light speed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Light doesn’t cut, explode, or interact with matter. All feats will be a rejected. No exceptions.thats an example
of course other feats where it violates standards and has no way to be proven as light speed
I dont flow with explosionsLight doesn’t cut, explode, or interact with matter. All feats will be a rejected. No exceptions.
The Webster definition which you used earlier literally saids repel can mean turn aside.summary (again)
Light makes a noise, proven by the sfx. We dont know what type yet. Could be impact, because the symbol is somewhat similar to one used for clang (which may explain why viz did what they did) or could be sizzle from burning. Its been put up for translation
"turn aside" was a mistranslation. Its actually "repel", which as akm pointed out, doesnt mean reflection
The light itself doesnt reflect like diffusion or any other kind. my argument is that it possibly is expanding, but that part is not to important.
the beam was argued to have "aoe", so even as a concetrated beam it doesnt behave like reflection
kubo shows he can draw proper reflection in the same arc
Another issue is the heat it has for vaporization may also be an anti feat, regarding speed
and a lot of "lets ignore physics" so far from the thread so far, although that violates light standards
Alright I asked Arc to translate what the background sound means since he knows japanese and this is what he had to say.
Basically to summarize its translates to "Bachin" which is usually used as an effect for a sword moving through the air at high speed. So it is an effect of Renji's sword moving to block or reflect Mask's attack than the sound generated from Mask's attack hitting his sword.
There we go again. Light has minuscule mass. Similar to how matter in Bleach has a minuscule soul/Reishi. Isn’t that a surprise? You question has been answered. The Reishi Light has more Reishi than real light.Miniscule mass.
Show me the suns rays causing explosions or a basic laser causing impacts
can you ask arc regarding thisRenji just places his sword in the beam's path. The sound affect is to signify the speed at which he places it there.
What?Also"Single-scattering albedo"proves it doesn't have to be sunlight to be produce reflection and abortion effects at the same time
Don’t concede that easily. At least acknowledge it.we are past the reishi point. Its moot. reishi light isnt LS just because, it has to be proven
All your arguments against it have been debunked and you provided no evidence for any of them.it isnt conceding. you are the only person arguing all reishi light is > LS
you havent proven anything regarding that, just that it predates irl light
Actually give me evidence to that or drop it
I'd still wait for another opinion regarding this to be sure, from a neutral party. From the link Cyber provided, it seemed like it was the sound caused by the attack suddenly getting off'd.Basically to summarize its translates to "Bachin" which is usually used as an effect for a sword moving through the air at high speed.
why is arc not neutralfrom a neutral party
What are you talking aboutAll your arguments against it have been debunked and you provided no evidence for any of them.
Your last argument was addressed and you ignore it. That is what it means to concede.
1. Reishi world contains more Reishi than the Kishi Wold.
2. The Reishi in the Kishi World is minuscule exactly how Light contains minuscule matter as you said.
We aren’t talking about speed.What are you talking about
Ive provided citations for my claims
neither of the those points address speed. try again
I know you didn't ask why Arc isn't neutral in a Bleach threadwhy is arc not neutral
In this case it can. The only difference between repel and reflect is that reflect is turning away specifically light,heat ect while repel has no specification of what it can turn away or throw back.Reio, repel doesnt mean reflect
what benefit does arc have for lying again, and even if he is impartial why assume he is lying or incorrectI know you didn't ask why Arc isn't neutral in a Bleach thread
.....We aren’t talking about speed.
Nice try.
The evidence explains clearly why “light” in the Reishi world can “explode” or interact with Reishi floors unlike “light” in the real world. It contains more mass.
I never said he's lying, i just said he's not neutralwhat benefit does arc have for lying again, and even if he is impartial why assume he is lying
i edited my post, just because he might be impartial does not mean he is incorrectI never said he's lying, i just said he's not neutral
read the thread.In this case it can. The only difference between repel and reflect is that reflect is turning away specifically light,heat ect while repel has no specification of what it can turn away or throw back.
And we know that renji is repelling light so that can mean reflecting
Again. Nothing to do with our current debate about light not been light because it makes explosions. In a nutshell, you have no argument. How can you? You can’t create a rebuttal for facts......
You have lost me
This entire thread is about if the light is LS, via having actual properties of light. It predating doesnt justify explosions
DudeAgain. Nothing to do with our current debate about light not been light because it makes explosions. In a nutshell, you have no argument. How can you? You can’t create a rebuttal for facts.
need i remind you tried to force a thread closure
They did. That thread is not relevant here. If this is you implying that I have some bias against Bleach as a verse, you couldn't be more wrong. I don't even get involved in threads and only come to help because nobody does.Is not like the Bleach downgrade thread votes came from a neutral party.
Never said he is lying. But an opinion of a hardcore supporter of the verse is inherently questioned as being biased. As you can see, he has his own "interpretation" of what that sound means despite another source describing it differently. We don't believe everything about translations the hardcore supporters of the verse say just because they can read japanese. A neutral party is always involved and happens for every verse.what benefit does arc have for lying again, and even if he is impartial why assume he is lying or incorrect