- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #401
Reishi light predates light. Why are they similar? They literally do not behave the same at all
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Bleach- PTS Speed Downgrade
- Thread starter Cyberblader90
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bleach renji abarai
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,160
Once again, both of you get on track
- 11,506
- 3,074
Reishi light > real light
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #404
I am on track
I have two arguments given to me that contradict each other
either mask's beam is exclusively LS
or all reishi is
which is it
I have two arguments given to me that contradict each other
either mask's beam is exclusively LS
or all reishi is
which is it
- 11,506
- 3,074
Candice Reishi lightning is said to be above nature’s lightning.
Reishi Light > nature light
Reishi World > Kishi World
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,160
This, no one except apple is calling all reishi light speed, and if so for diffrent reasons, this is not at all relevant
- 6,229
- 2,653
Reishi and kishin are basically the same diference is interaction
reishi light is the same as kishin light
the light from the sun or a camera from the human world is no deferent from the light of the sun or camera from the SS
- 287
- 283
As I said before from what I have personally seen you argued that the reflection shouldn't be happening so and so way because Zabimaru is a flat surface which was argued against.
This is totally irrelevant. You claimed that if heat was present that means the beam in its entirety should have been absorbed and should not have reflected and somehow counted it as an anti feat. I literally provided evidence that disproves this entirely. To generate heat the entire beam does not need to be absorbed only a portion of it is enough. Mask's attack can emit how much ever heat it doesn't matter. Renji's sword didn't absorb the entire beam and the rest was reflected off the sword.
This is where i tell you to stop dwelving too much into physics. This is fiction ffs. Ofc physics should be used as a base to evaluate feats but this is literally is digging deep into it. Its already told you why such statements do not work in fiction. By this logic I can literally claim that MFTL should not exist since nothing in the universe can move faster than light. His attack was concentrated at a singe point as simple as that.
It does tho. Some of the beam was absorbed by the sword and rest was reflected off. You saying the angles of incidence is not equal to the angle of reflection isn't a counter. It is nitpicking and putting the author on a pedestal to draw each and and everything with perfect knowledge of physics and take the time to draw them based on that.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #409
Apple, all you have proven is that reishi light predates light
pre·date1
/prēˈdāt/
verb
exist or occur at a date earlier than (something)
nothing about it being faster
Candice's reishi arrows are slightly slower than lightning or at best equal
only electrocution is considered above lightning, and even then they dont mention speed
pre·date1
/prēˈdāt/
verb
exist or occur at a date earlier than (something)
nothing about it being faster
Candice's reishi arrows are slightly slower than lightning or at best equal
only electrocution is considered above lightning, and even then they dont mention speed
- 6,229
- 2,653
this is candice on the novels which is weaker than when she was on the war arc due to Yhwach taking away power form them
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #411
Again, kubo has drawn proper reflection, in the same arc.
Diffusion reflection is for NON FLAT surfaces. Ive given citations as to why this isnt that.
You argued AOE fallacy for the light.If you are going to argue it, then stick with it and dont half argue it. It being concentrated is a valid point
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #412
They refer to her lost vollstandig. Do you have a citation for her base being affected
- 11,506
- 3,074
I was referring to the latter.
Ginjo is mocking Candice because her Reishi lightning is slower than light, Fullbringers turn the Reishi in matter into “Fullbring light” to move. The soul inside matter wherever Reishi or Kishi.
- 31,208
- 27,406
Not in terms of speed.
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,160
when, why does that meet this frankly arbitrary definition of "true reflection"
- 11,506
- 3,074
General. It wasn’t said to be power.
- 6,229
- 2,653
the statement was in general, damage.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #418
- 11,506
- 3,074
When visible light is absorbed by an object, the object converts the short wavelength light into long wavelength heat. This causes the object to get warmer. But this is only part of the story as to why Earth is warm. ... When absorbed, the short wavelength sunlight is converted to long wavelength heat.
Proving Quincy Reishi arrows to be “Arrows of Light” or “Rays of Light” as stated in the source material.
This is relevant with all Reishi energy attacks having vaporization feats.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #421
My issue with quincy arrows isnt this scene.
i agree with you that this scene is rather good to prove it as light
my issue is stuff like explosions/impacts happening rather often with these.
Light doesnt do that
i agree with you that this scene is rather good to prove it as light
my issue is stuff like explosions/impacts happening rather often with these.
Light doesnt do that
- 31,208
- 27,406
Actually, the first statement for it in the novel specifies power. I've read the official translation.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #423
renji scene is far different. Star goes out flat like a 2d shape on a non flat surface
- 287
- 283
I already pointed out why this is irrelevant. Two different feats. Two different angles. Doesn't mean he can't portray it wrongly. He isn't a scientist or physics expert to measure the aoi and aor and make it equal for each and every feat involving light. He is a mangaka ffs.
And I and various members have argued against it. First of all Renji's Zabimaru has several ridges from where his blade extends and if you see the scans again Mask's beam covers two to three of its ridges. This itself can be argued to be the cause of diffusion reflection. And again you are holding the author to a high pedestal when each of his rays has to be properly reflected then only it can be considered as light. Such standards are held to no other verse here.
And I am still sticking to it lol. You claimed why didn't the atmosphere burn. I claimed that this was an AOE fallacy and that Mask could just be concentrating his attack to a point which is why the atmosphere is not affected which is why the atmosphere was not affected.
- 11,506
- 3,074
Those two statements are not relevant to each other. Even in the manga Liltotto makes fun of Candice that 5 Gigajoules of power will not harm Ichigo.
- 11,506
- 3,074
So let me ask you again.
Should we remove all LS feats based on “beams of light” and “lasers” interacting with matter? That includes light cutting feats.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #427
It seems there is a misunderstanding here. The surface of zabimaru isnt flat. We agree on this.
My issue is what happened with renji isnt diffusion. Re read the secene
The star goes out flat like 2-d paper. its not going at an angle.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #428
light that explodes, since that means it doesnt act like photons, for oneSo let me ask you again.
Should we remove all LS feats based on “beams of light” and “lasers” interacting with matter? That includes light cutting feats.
- 6,229
- 2,653
the power of the arrows yes, for electrocution the statement was general
Arcker123
He/Him- 8,075
- 6,160
Scans
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #431
reason this is relevant, and tying in with your first point. it being concentrated and a few meters long should mean the star should diffuse aand go out at angles, likewise to several meters. that doesnt happen
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #432
- 11,506
- 3,074
Don’t make exceptions. All or nothing.
- 11,134
- 14,116
Going by the original thread, I have a few issues that I would like to be answered here before I give my opinion about this.
The attack is called a beam of light by the person. I don't see any other reliable sources saying that it is lightspeed? If there are, I think they should be provided. Because just being called a "beam of light" isn't proof on its own, as you can gather by many other such beams that are called light like piccolo's makankosappo, ginyu's change beam, freeza's death beam and so on. That's why our standards are there.
A supporting point was brought up that it got reflected off a metal surface. We see smoke rising from it and a character statement that says he deflected/repelled it. I mean, sure it got deflected, but nobody would have made this argument if he deflected/repelled it with his hands instead, or just swatted it away like a fly. Or if he had a different weapon in his hand instead of a metal. The statement "you deflected/repelled by attack" would still be valid in that case, and the feat would have been played out the same way. I don't think the reflection point is a strong point in favor of the feat. But even if we consider this as valid, it is still only one criteria, so I am not gonna argue this point in detail.
I believe the argument about the sfx is a valid concern, since the previous thread said that it did not explode, just burned. And while the "klang" sound was addressed, the sfx was not. I don't think real light would produce a sound, but let's wait for the translation to be 100% sure, since it is an important point.
The attack is called a beam of light by the person. I don't see any other reliable sources saying that it is lightspeed? If there are, I think they should be provided. Because just being called a "beam of light" isn't proof on its own, as you can gather by many other such beams that are called light like piccolo's makankosappo, ginyu's change beam, freeza's death beam and so on. That's why our standards are there.
A supporting point was brought up that it got reflected off a metal surface. We see smoke rising from it and a character statement that says he deflected/repelled it. I mean, sure it got deflected, but nobody would have made this argument if he deflected/repelled it with his hands instead, or just swatted it away like a fly. Or if he had a different weapon in his hand instead of a metal. The statement "you deflected/repelled by attack" would still be valid in that case, and the feat would have been played out the same way. I don't think the reflection point is a strong point in favor of the feat. But even if we consider this as valid, it is still only one criteria, so I am not gonna argue this point in detail.
I believe the argument about the sfx is a valid concern, since the previous thread said that it did not explode, just burned. And while the "klang" sound was addressed, the sfx was not. I don't think real light would produce a sound, but let's wait for the translation to be 100% sure, since it is an important point.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #436
summary (again)
Light makes a noise, proven by the sfx. We dont know what type yet. Could be impact, because the symbol is somewhat similar to one used for clang (which may explain why viz did what they did) or could be sizzle from burning. Its been put up for translation
"turn aside" was a mistranslation. Its actually "repel", which as akm pointed out, doesnt mean reflection
The light itself doesnt reflect like diffusion or any other kind. my argument is that it possibly is expanding, but that part is not to important.
the beam was argued to have "aoe", so even as a concetrated beam it doesnt behave like reflection
kubo shows he can draw proper reflection in the same arc
Another issue is the heat it has for vaporization may also be an anti feat, regarding speed
and a lot of "lets ignore physics" so far from the thread so far, although that violates light standards
Light makes a noise, proven by the sfx. We dont know what type yet. Could be impact, because the symbol is somewhat similar to one used for clang (which may explain why viz did what they did) or could be sizzle from burning. Its been put up for translation
"turn aside" was a mistranslation. Its actually "repel", which as akm pointed out, doesnt mean reflection
The light itself doesnt reflect like diffusion or any other kind. my argument is that it possibly is expanding, but that part is not to important.
the beam was argued to have "aoe", so even as a concetrated beam it doesnt behave like reflection
kubo shows he can draw proper reflection in the same arc
Another issue is the heat it has for vaporization may also be an anti feat, regarding speed
and a lot of "lets ignore physics" so far from the thread so far, although that violates light standards
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #437
What exceptions?
- 11,506
- 3,074
Explosions.
- 5,658
- 4,892
- Thread starter
- #439
thats an example
of course other feats where it violates standards and has no way to be proven as light speed
- 2,954
- 1,440
I already debunked this earlier. Electromagnetic waves produce momentum which has mass
Similar threads
- Locked
