-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Big fat anti feats for ben 10
- Thread starter Robo432343
- Start date
-
- Tags
- ben 10
- Status
- 7,638
- 7,806
First, these were already addressed previously.
Last edited:
- 3,448
- 2,220
Was it accepted?
- 2,027
- 1,924
people is talking abt ben ten anti feats for a while so ofc it brought attention
- 1,056
- 521
man my crt didn't get attention like that even it was open for a month
- 12,804
- 5,936
- Thread starter
- #166
so whats going to happen if the 5-A downgrade passes
- 7,638
- 7,806
Second of all, this thread doesn't even propose a revision to evaluate. It's just, "Hey, look at this."
- 1,056
- 521
Probably They will back to high 6A-Low 5-B like which Reiner made
- 7,638
- 7,806
No one officially voted for anything because there was no proposal given to vote about in the first place.
- 2,016
- 2,428
As much as I disagree with things like High 5-A Base Ben, it'd be better if downgrade threads actually proposed changes and explained how the verse would be reworked to improve profiles rather than pointing out an anti-feat and leaving it there, it feels like a lot of people just want to change the stats of the profiles with less regard for the quality of the profiles
- 12,804
- 5,936
- Thread starter
- #171
its on the supporters to do that, not the people making the downgrades
- 3,448
- 2,220
- 12,804
- 5,936
- Thread starter
- #173
never said it was???
- 3,448
- 2,220
Then why is it up to the supporters to do that?
- 12,804
- 5,936
- Thread starter
- #175
why would someone making a downgrade thread have to explain how the verse can be reworked??? it is not their problem at all
- 2,016
- 2,428
If you make a CRT then you need make clear proposals instead of pointing out an anti-feat, that way the discussion actually has a sense of direction rather than being a jumbled mess that doesn't get anywhere like what's happened with this CRT
- 12,804
- 5,936
- Thread starter
- #177
i agree with u on this
mb
- 10,544
- 12,375
- @Damage3245 voted in favor of OP
- @Maverick_Zero_X gave a couple comments seemingly in favor as well.
While OP should be constructed better, it's reasonable to conclude it wants to downgrade the 5-A stats by showing antifeats. As such, it currently would have indeed 1 vote in favor of downgrade, with another unclear one.
Please bring them up.
While certainly good etiquette, it is technically not obligatory for the downgrading party to do so. That being said:
@Robo432343 do provide what these downgrades will entail, please.
- 15,599
- 22,911
I was under the impression the OP wanted to bring back Clockwork's Unknown statistics.
- 12,804
- 5,936
- Thread starter
- #180
i think this thread should be closed
because there are better threads addressing 5-A issues
because there are better threads addressing 5-A issues
- 10,544
- 12,375
Fine with me
- Status
Similar threads
