I’m not going to really be able to respond until later tonight, so I’ll just say this for now.
Argument: all these are haxes since they didn't said "Alien X was unleashing X amount of energy in t amount of time and has good reality warping"?
To clarify, the argument isn’t that all of these statements are haxes because Alien X wasn’t said to be releasing energy (but that would be helpful if it was)
The argument is that these statements are contextually referring to hax because that is what the context is given in the show, specifically referring to abilities being the greatest power in the universe instead of raw power. As well as the fact that their “Omnipotence” can be taken or replicated by other beings that are not as physically strong as Celestialsapiens, like Aggregor.
The context no longer defaults to scaling to physicals and AP at that point, without greater evidence to prove it should scale to physicals.
Especially the existence erasing part of this, which from what I see, is still being determined on whether or not that even scales to AP in the first place (and by AP, I mean attacks, physical strikes or durability)
_________________
I’ve also been made aware of the Contimelia feat that’s being used for Alien X in this thread. So while I didn’t initially make an argument against it, I’m also against this now.
The Annihilaarghs big bang feat is simply that, a 1-B level big bang. It is a creation feat. There’s nothing that can be overpowered or requires durability to survive because it’s a big bang applied as creation, so there’s no offensive force behind it like it would as a destruction feat. It’s a non-physical expansion of space-time to create what’s getting made. You can’t “tank” creation being made.
Even the site doesn’t consider being in a big bang a feat AFAIK.