- 6,007
- 1,807
- Thread starter
- #41
It's easy to find raws, but the subs for them are terrible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, don't see why we need to treat it as a real uni if he ***** with illusions.(Statement about Thermal Pisces' dimension not being real)
I don't see any galaxy creation. Seems more like a visual thing. but even if it wasn't, it was already around before the whole "move" thing began.(Gingka creating the galaxy, it's kind of debatable ig whether he created it or not)
This seems legit igHere's the constellation feat as well, for reference
Well, ig these can be judged then:
Right, hang on@SamanPatou @Armorchompy @Confluctor
Would you be willing to take a look?
The videos related to the OP are in this comment.
@JJSliderman For future reference, you should always include the evidences in your OP only so it is easier to evaluate.
Yeah, those videos don’t have me convinced as that shows a actual pocket dimension rather than a full on universe ngl as the tempest part doesn’t give me the impression of being a universe although that probably deserves a different thread as the main topic is the one for your OP.Sure, don't see why we need to treat it as a real uni if he ***** with illusions.
I don't see any galaxy creation. Seems more like a visual thing. but even if it wasn't, it was already around before the whole "move" thing began.
This seems legit ig
What is the relevance of these videos exactly? And what exactly is happening in the second one? I am slightly confused.
I already countered this part of the thread above. It wasn’t already there. It doesn’t come into view at all until the time the attack is used.I don't see any galaxy creation. Seems more like a visual thing. but even if it wasn't, it was already around before the whole "move" thing began.
i saw that but wasn't good enough. watch the video again and pay closer attention to the angles.I already countered this part of the thread above. It wasn’t already there. It doesn’t come into view at all until the time the attack is used.
Because there’s absolutely no basis for that other than being pure headcanon and the context quite obviously points to the feat being 100% real.Oh, finally someone is downgrading this. I don't know why we accept Beyblades creating galaxies or universes and most of the time it's just the visual of the technique and not the actual feat. Same goes for Pegasus "Flying to another galaxy" when it's just a cool visual effect for the move.
What angles though? The whole scene does the same thing that I specified above. We can take a deeper look.i saw that but wasn't good enough. watch the video again and pay closer attention to the angles.
Love someone who doesn’t know a thing about the show telling me what is and isn’t getting acceptedNot what happened in the show and not what we're accepting here, so, no.
.... You are joking right? Of course there won't be. Due to the angle, it can't be seen. Assuming it actually created a galaxy is just...Look at all the angles you want throughout the entire scene up until this point, and it’s still the same. There’s no Galaxy in view at all during that.
Screams the same as a 9-B character saying "I am attacking with the power of the universe"And by that point Pegasus is already doing the attack that involves the Galaxy.
.... You are joking right? Of course there won't be. Due to the angle, it can't be seen.
Because the move involves it? And it's not just some magical coincidence that one appears literally as the user is attacking with their technique?Assuming it actually created a galaxy is just...
....how?Screams the same as a 9-B character saying "I am attacking with the power of the universe"
Different angle.2 seconds later, we see again whats behind Pegasus. And whats there now? A galaxy.
I mean if it's such an important move in the show, surely they have three dozen other feats of doing the same thing? Or someone would have at least bothered to mention that he created a galaxy.Because the move involves it? And it's not just some magical coincidence that one appears literally as the user is attacking with their technique?
How is this a different angle? Please specify.Different angle.
I mean if it's such an important move in the show, surely they have three dozen other feats of doing the same thing? Or someone would have at least bothered to mention that he created a galaxy.
Sure. This isn't the same technique, but the same thing is done here too with this attack.So can you send some more videos or sequences where they perform the same attack, from a different angle or if someone mentions it, that will be great
The 3rd video doesnt involve a 3-C feat. It's purpose is to provide supporting context that the OP doesnt explain.I am not sure how any of these videos are proving 3-C?
Let's see, in your first video, if it supposedly created a galaxy, doesn't seem like it's... That big? I am just confused.
And the second one... Just proves the galaxy exists.
Also this dub is going to destroy my ear drums
He means Pegasus and Dark Wolf, which they undoubtedly are.Wait, dark wolf? I honestly don’t remember any of them being super casual tbh
Fair. But if not taken as a universe, then it wouldn’t be an outlier anymore and help out the 3-C ratings more.Dark Wolf seems more like a pocket dimension so I doubt it if anything as I don’t remember it being a universe nor was it stated.
This is assuming they did create a galaxy.Fair. But if not taken as a universe, then it wouldn’t be an outlier anymore and help out the 3-C ratings more.
Drawing power from the galaxy and IIRC each of the beyblades contained fragments of a meteor that hit the Earth and stuff.Upon rewatching it a few times, only thing I got from all of these videos is that Pegasus somehow draws powers from these galaxies.
In one of the videos, the MC even says "Pegasus can fly further than that". And then we see it reach the galaxy and then return from it.
Was the constellation feat though in the later season though?constellation
Yeah, again with this “visual effect” angle, which is (no offense to you specifically) just utter nonsense.Also don’t remember any of them creating a galaxy aside from the fact they involve special move in some cases and visual effect.
Well, it's only dubious depending on how you are looking at how the galaxy being shown and the timing of it. And even in the worst case scenario, like I said in my first response here, "Possibly 3-C" is another option to use for this.Instead of arguing about a clearly dubious galaxy creating feat, why not look for something more consistent and clear?