- 706
- 243
Well I’m pretty sure Szayelaporro was said to be an Adjucas during his time as an espada in the spirts are forever with you novelsyea, the only one we know is not one is arroniero
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well I’m pretty sure Szayelaporro was said to be an Adjucas during his time as an espada in the spirts are forever with you novelsyea, the only one we know is not one is arroniero
na, he was evolving still as shown in his backstory, the ones that did not were his "friends"If they had a Gillian as the Espada, I highly doubt all the rest of them are VL, without any Adjuchas there, especially since VL are considered super rare.
Also, wasn't Grimmjow an Adjuchas, I think I remember him specifically failing to become a VL as a source of contention with his pride.
I am pretty sure only 4 and up were VL before they became Arrancars
Facts.Kubo's storytelling is subtle.
That is the reason why people who don’t like Bleach are usually speed readers.Kubo's storytelling is subtle.
@Hasch; we already discussed it. Drop the topic already.
100%Ah yes we staff are tired of discussing such things so it must mean there’s no reason to discuss such.
Dude this website is for discussing whatever regarding scaling fiction, people are going to come in here all the time with new ideas or maybe are unaware of arguments used already.
Silencing people for the reason of “I don’t feel like talking about it” is scummy.
@Hasch; I've spoken to Antvasima and it is now a Discussion Rule. This topic has literally been done to death over the years, and the last Calc Group thread was the one was sorting it out, at least until the anime adaptation reaches that point. Please, drop it.
If topics keep going around and around and around, and staff members are sick of having to deal with the same topics that come up over years, then eventually that topic is going to be closed, at least for a time.
@Hasch; we had a calc group member's thread specifically to determine what the best method should be to solve this issue. We came to a conclusion.
Just because you don't like that conclusion doesn't mean you can then create a brand new thread to try and overturn it.
Is that not the purpose of creating new threads?Just because you don't like that conclusion doesn't mean you can then create a brand new thread to try and overturn it.