• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Axolotl Tier

Saikou_The_Lewd_King

The King of all Things Lewd
VS Battles
Retired
15,418
5,748
Surprised this wasn't brought up before given the nigh-spam this thing had over the few days, but whatever.

It's current reasoning for being higher dimensional honestly isn't enough. Being far above someone does not remotely imply higher dimensionality, and "existing in the time-space between time-space" sounds like meaningless technobabble, especially since you could just interpret it as existing between universes. At the very least, more things are needed here to warrant this tier.

"Omniscience" seems also sketchy. "Know-it-all" does not really imply omniscience, unless the context gives us more.
 
I agree that High 2-A needs more explanation but I think it should still be likely High 2-A via this my statement on the original Axolotl thread.
 
@Gehrman

The scan that you posted literally says that hyperspace > 3 dimensions.

Anyway, the downgrades can be applied I think. Dunno which intelligence rating would be adequate, but omniscient seems unsupported
 
Since several staff members agree with this, I think that the changes can probably be applied.
 
There is a CRT about upgrading Bill to High 2-A I believe, which would scale to the Axolotl.

We'll see how that one goes, if it's rejected, we'll downgrade Axolotl to 2-A
 
I downgraded it

What should we do about the intelligence? That justification definitely isn't enough for omniscience
 
I think being the same intelligence as Bill should be fine, since Bill refers to it as "Know-It-All". Just higher into Nigh-Omniscience should be good.
 
I'd rather check the statement itself.

Know-it-all can be used to mock someone depending from the context.
 
That's fair.
 
I mean, I guess? We have people who see 2-A multiverses as ants without the "at least", and people who have it via stomping a baseline.
 
Like it says on the tin. Baseline is being able to destroy/affect/etc an infinite multiverse.
 
Not really. It is largely contextual.

Being vastly superior to a person who does it qualifies for being above baseline, though.
 
Yes.

But i'd argue that it isn't worth an "at least" given that the gap is infinite before the next tier (which is why say, Madoka doesn't have an "at least" even if she stomps baseline 2-As)
 
The only "at leasts" I can think of that don't just have a higher tier in the same key are SMT and Digimon, who also have many that aren't at least. The Ur Dragon has High 2-A in the same key so I didn't count him.
 
Actually, every 2-A in Digimon is infinitely above baseline.

But yeah as I said, I think that stomping a baseline shouldn't give you the "at least".

I mean we don't make the 3-As in DBS "at least 3-A" via stomping people, dunno why we would do it for 2-A
 
Kaltias is correct, given that we are dealing with infinity here.
 
Back
Top