- 9,389
- 6,692
That's just Contradicts with these two statements.
When Mana makes a home in living creatures it turns into power. If you say Mana is soul then living creatures born without souls until they gets mana inside their bodies or they gets mana storage? Does it makes sense. No.
Wait a minute how TF Asta is alive without mana
No mana = No soul
Soul with Mana. If both are same there is no need to mention with.
Here is the thing.
it's clearly differentiates two things.
It's hard to type in mobile. I will reply tomorrow for any other arguments.
Look man… The difference between mana and soul is the same as asking me which came first chicken or the egg. Chicken is Mana, Egg is Soul. I don’t ******* know. Regardless of what came first, one can’t exist without the other.
The reason why supporters say Mana > Soul and not “=” is because Mana exists outside the soul as well like within nature which is why I said it can also be equalized with Reichi btw.
The Imperial sword for instance absorbs the mana from the environment. However when it absorbs a person’s mana it takes their soul. That’s why Conrad wanted to use the sword to resurrect everyone once they all die from his attack.
Everyone’s point at the end of the day is, the relationship between energy and soul exists in Black Clover as it does with Bleach. Damn 4 pages talking about equalization? What the actual ****? I’m outta here.
Don’t even ask me about Asta @Lynieryz because we know that man is literally the flaw of existence.