- 1,601
- 2,974
I figured there should be a thread for this.
Last edited:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania Spoiler Discussion Thread
- Thread starter Dinobot1996
- Start date
- 17,148
- 26,856
And we're here for it
- 10,739
- 16,002
MCU Supporters:
Excellence616
He/Him- 5,985
- 4,299
Last edited:
- 9,111
- 13,722
Well this should be interesting
- 4,111
- 8,385
This movie sure makes me go, "Damn, the first Ant-Man was a really good movie."
- 9,111
- 13,722
I mean, not gonna disagree with that
- 2,304
- 2,734
What about that flashbacks with those exploding planets?
- 9,111
- 13,722
Well it confirms Kang destroyed entire worlds in the past and did so with timelines as well since it's made clear they're memories and not possibilities but it's never explained how he did it. Tech is the most likely answer of course
- 2,304
- 2,734
Looks like every Nathaniel Richards variant has tech that can erase an entire timeline (2-A)
- 4,111
- 8,385
We should create a category on the MCU Home Page just for Kang Variants
- 8,997
- 9,718
- 8,344
- 8,831
Just came back from the theatres, the movie was okay, but kinda generic in my opinion.
And now, we could actually have profiles for Cassie Lang (not sure if she scales to her father in normal state or huge state) and maybe even rename Yellowjacket's profile to MODOK or something. Come to think of it, where would MODOK even scale? And How was Kang able to destroy multiple timelines or slay many other variants of the Avengers?
And now, we could actually have profiles for Cassie Lang (not sure if she scales to her father in normal state or huge state) and maybe even rename Yellowjacket's profile to MODOK or something. Come to think of it, where would MODOK even scale? And How was Kang able to destroy multiple timelines or slay many other variants of the Avengers?
- 10,739
- 16,002
I think it'd be better if his profile page's name was just Darren Cross, so that Yellow Jacket & MODOK could be used as his KEY Names
- 9,111
- 13,722
It's never properly explained but it's heavily implied it was through technology
- 10,739
- 16,002
- 2,304
- 2,734
Kang without his suit would be 9-B for physically overpowering Scott Lang and breaking his helmet. With his suit he would be At least 6-B for having killed several iterations of the Avengers, including Thor. Maybe even High 6-A for that scene where he seemingly burns half of a planet with his energy discharge. And with his technology he would be 2-A for destroying entire timelines.
- 9,111
- 13,722
My Kang blog is here (it's incomplete obviously), I've found a good render but it tells me it's too big for the website
vsbattles.fandom.com
Kang the Conqueror (MCU)
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 8,344
- 8,831
We don't know how else he killed the Avengers even with his suit, although his suit did survive hits from giant ant-man
- 1,601
- 2,974
- Thread starter
- #21
Considering that Ant-Man has a 0.0023791240581524 ton durability feat listed on his profile, seeing how close that is to the halfway point of 9-B, should Kang be 9-B+ physically?
- 2,304
- 2,734
His energy discharge harmed him too
- 2,304
- 2,734
This needs to be calculated. The explosion has the same visuals as Kang's energy discharge. And is causes a giant crater on a planet
- 2,304
- 2,734
Requested the calc.
- 31,209
- 27,406
That's a great render. I think it just needs to be re-saved to a smaller file type.
- 8,997
- 9,718
My Kang blog is here (it's incomplete obviously), I've found a good render but it tells me it's too big for the website
Kang the Conqueror (MCU)
Found the same render but with a smaller file size
- 2,304
- 2,734
Here's the unedited gif version of the feat. Looks like it could go as up as 5-C
- 9,111
- 13,722
Perfect, I'll edit the blog right now
- 31,209
- 27,406
It would make no sense at all to end a hugely successful franchise like that.
Sure, it's a disappointing that the majority of Phase 4 hasn't lived up to what has come before.... but I'd much rather Phase 4 exist in its current state than never have happened at all.
- 17,148
- 26,856
Likewise I fully agree here and that'd apply no matter what if the franchise did what the MCU did with the same level of impact.
- 3,084
- 1,145
Disagree completely. I’d rather there be no shit, than shit. Why would I want to waste my time watching a movie that I hope gives me something good and I end up regretting? when I can waste my time actually enjoying something? What’s the point? You lose 2-3 hours on an experience you wish you didn’t have.
such a weird take you have.
- 31,209
- 27,406
Err, nobody asked you to watch them. If you figure it's a waste of your own time to watch them then quit watching them... I'm not going to give up because I actually do enjoy the franchise and the majority of the latest films and shows from it.
- 8,344
- 8,831
While it is your opinion, you don't need to be such a party pooper about it
- 189
- 76
Wait, I'm confused. Did you watch Quantumania or not? Because if you watched it, are you saying that you now will no longer watch any new MCU content -- including Kang Dynasty and Secret Wars? Or did you not watch it, in which case how can you accurately judge the movie?
Last edited:
- 39,646
- 15,557
Uncalled, rude, and make you looks like an a**hole
If you don't want to continue then just leave without being such of bombastic douchebag
Another respect lost for you
- 189
- 76
Anyway ... Quantumania DIRECTOR Peyton Reed, in Vanity Fair:
“We liked the idea of this very fearsome warrior whose head is essentially a supernova, a star that’s got to be contained within this thick glass-like cylinder,” Reed explains. “When he unleashes it, it’s a lethal weapon.”
Kang one-shotted this dude dead. Seems like rock solid 4-C Kang battle armor at minimum.
“We liked the idea of this very fearsome warrior whose head is essentially a supernova, a star that’s got to be contained within this thick glass-like cylinder,” Reed explains. “When he unleashes it, it’s a lethal weapon.”
Kang one-shotted this dude dead. Seems like rock solid 4-C Kang battle armor at minimum.
- 2,304
- 2,734
Could be a hyperbole, but Xolum is surely 6-B for killing that amoeba several times larger than Giant-Man
