• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Another Another SCP Fights Monika

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn't change the fact that she erases everything. Plus, seh could erase DDLC from outside the game itself.
 
Plus, wouldn't it be considered as incapacitated for manifesting in a world monika doesn't even exist, and needing years for that?

Hell, would it affect monika if she is outside of that reality?
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
Hl3 or bust said:
yes, since 2747 can destroy concepts
But would it affect something outside of the reality its affecting?
even when Monika erases the universe, shee's still within a narritivee which 2747 can manefest in
 
A definition of narrative should be put within the scp foundation-verse page , because her point in-verse is that she is outside of her narrative.
 
Would she know to destroy it before it's too late tho, since she has no clue whats happening
 
kinda wierd but ok

>Monikda randomly destrpys the universe

>2747 manefests anyways as it resists EE

>kills her concepts

this is basically it afaik
 
But again, would it apear in her?

Actualy, could someonegive me the scp definition of a narrative?
 
Ricsi-viragosi said:
But again, would it apear in her?
Actualy, could someonegive me the scp definition of a narrative?
that doesn't matter iirc

not entirely sure, you may want to ask Weekly or Agnaa about that
 
>Asks if it apears in her

>doesn't matter

U what mate? She is outside of her own verses narractive, so that being destroyed on a conceptual level doesn't really matter.
 
ok then, if it appears inside of her, she can't do anything as she cannot percieve it and it eventually kills her
 
Which is why I asked if it would apear in her despite her being outside of a narrative
 
In SCP, you cannot be outside of a narritive because if you do, you never existed in the first place since Swann never wrote you into being
 
Hl3 or bust said:
In SCP, you cannot be outside of a narritive because if you do, you never existed in the first place since Swann never wrote you into being
In DDLC, she was created by a "god", and then she was erased from that very creation, at which point the narrative of her verse rewrote itself, as she never existed.
 
Hl3 or bust said:
kinda wierd but ok
She gotfriendzoned, then even after she was the litiral last girl on the (now nonexisting) planet the guy broke up with her. She then decided that erasing reality, and re-erasing it if re-added, is the way to go.
 
SCP-2747 doesn't resist existence erasure.

The possibly type 8 is due to it spontaneously re-appearing somewhere completely different after being destroyed, it seemingly keeps coming back as long as there's narratives for it to be an anti-narrative to.

Narratives in the SCP universe are where everything resides. "Lower" narratives are perceived as fictional from higher narratives (every book/tv show/movie/game in a higher narrative is a reality in a lower narrative). Nothing has really shown to exist outside of the plot, and the 2 or 3 beings that are are way too powerful for 2747 to effect.

2747 "goes away" after the narrative it's in is erased, but could still spontaneously re-appear. But if Monika exists outside of plots entirely, then I see no reason why it would manifest in her.
 
So.

If she erases everything (or herself if its the "happy" ending) and gets thrown out of her own plot, it won't affect her?

Then yeah, I stay with the least waifu material in DDLC
 
Bump.
 
Bump!
 
Noted, and bumping.
 
Bump.
 
Only 5-6 votes away, better bump.
 
People haven't posted in a while, better bump.
 
I've been trying to post this for a week but I've been waiting for my account to autoconfirm, so here it is:

From the SCP Wiki page for 2747:

"SCP-2747 represents evidence of a naturally-occuring anafabula, or anti-narrative: a cluster of interdependent signs, iconography and narremes that, when included to a sufficient extent within a fictional construct, leads to mutual annihilation...It can effect through layers of metafictional narrative, i.e. a metanarrative containing the anafabula will cease to exist within the narrative, followed by the narrative itself disappearing from our reality."
Basically, 2747 is a collection of story elements that destroy its own narrative, and the narrative above it. Imagine a movie character reading a book containing 2747: 2747 will cause the book to disappear from the movie, then cause the movie to disappear from our reality. As an example, these themes appear in the article itself, which theoretically would cause the article to be destroyed, and then the whole SCP universe. In Monika's case, if 2747's story elements appear in one save file (if we imagine one save to be one timeline, with Monika having control over all timelines), it would delete that save's timeline, then delete the whole of DDLC from existence.

If Monika was smart enough, she could find the specific story elements from 2747 that appear in DDLC, and remove them before the end of the game (one story element of 2747 is that the story never reaches a conclusion, which could occur if the player never deletes the save and stays with Monika in the room forever). However, I highly doubt there is a way she could know about 2747 and its story elements, and given its subtle nature, I'd say 2747 wins this one.
 
Bump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top