• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

And Infinity Gaunlet?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The infinity gauntlet without a gemstone is more powerful than the Nullifier, how could that it is more than Nemesis, personified gauntlet , or the same gauntlet ?

In the abraxas Reed with nullifier, not galactus, destroy only a universe 616, no more.

in hickman run the nullifer can not destroy a simple Celestial...


Galactus is less powerful than Ego a planet...
 
Marvel is extremely inconsistent from story to story. In the "Infinity War" event, the Infinity Gauntlet was more powerful than the Nullifier, but it has also been shown as strictly universal in scale, whereas the Nullifier, in Galactus' hands can destroy and recreate a multiverse.

Galactus also used to be far less powerful than currently when first introduced.
 
wrong you refer to Abraxas saga, in that comic Reed uses the nullifier, not Galactus! Destroy only Eternity 616, but Eternity recreates himself, not the Nullifier. Infact the ultimate nullifier sends the target to Oblivion, we can see this in the Quasar comic, Quasar was hit by Nullifier and therefore he goes to Oblivion. But Eternity can not be trapped by Oblivion.

the ultmate nullifer only destroy Eternity 616, he allows him to do. not create nothing.

its inferiority to Ego is reiterated in a 2016 comic Thanos.
I1wKtH6
 
Yes, after checking it up, you appear to be correct in that Reed Richards used the Nullifier to recreate the multiverse without Abraxas.

However, you should read the following pages regarding our rules for the ridiculously extreme levels of inconsistency within Marvel Comics. Different concepts from different authors and eras, generally tend to be ignored in much later stories:

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Power-scaling_Rules_for_Marvel_and_DC_Comics

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Marvel_Character_Statistics_Scaling
 
No Reeds elimiates only Eternity 616! You don't understand, Eternity 616 recreates himself, not the ultimate nullifier, its characteristic is only destroy. You understand that if you was hit by nullifier you go to Oblivion only?
 
I have read Mark Gruenwald's Quasar story, and the concepts within it were definitely not referenced within Jeph Loeb's Abraxas storyline, several years later. Given Marvel's ridiculously extreme inconsistency and incoherence, we cannot apply obscure concepts from one story, era, and writer, to another, unless they were shown to apply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top