- 15,490
- 4,470
Infinite speed feats leads to certain other rating Ruffy....The only thing missing is infinite speed to match Goku low 1-C
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Infinite speed feats leads to certain other rating Ruffy....The only thing missing is infinite speed to match Goku low 1-C
Good stuffInfinite speed feats leads to certain other rating Ruffy....
I suppose being spherical and having a circumference isn't enough evidence to form a counterargument, eh?So, when we have the infinite Universe for DBS? I believe that Bulma is no longer a contradiction in anything related to the Universe
That was taken from my CRTI suppose being spherical and having a circumference isn't enough evidence to form a counterargument, eh?
NoDid you link to the wrong post?
https://vsbattles.com/threads/back-to-the-beginning.169147/post-6649009The post you linked to didn't address anything about topography.
i feel as if there is a lot more implying it is infiniteOkay, I'm not talking about visual depictions, I'm talking about text describing the in-universe topography.
Speak as clearly as possibleOkay, I'm not talking about visual depictions, I'm talking about text describing the in-universe topography.
This has been buried in the cemetery, there is no longer a marble-shaped Universe, this has been removed so as not to contradict the space-time dimensions (something like that i remember)When he says topography, it means the shape of the universes structure basically
What if Plan to Eradicate the Super Saiyans introduces a planet existing "at the end of the universe" (宇宙の果て uchū no hate), which is then reiterated by the Supplementary Daizenshuu?i feel as if there is a lot more implying it is infinite
Toei downgrade through translationWhat if Plan to Eradicate the Super Saiyans introduces a planet existing "at the end of the universe" (宇宙の果て uchū no hate), which is then reiterated by the Supplementary Daizenshuu?
could mean observable, also if your argument is as vague as plan to eradicate the saiyans i feel like this is grasping at strawsWhat if Plan to Eradicate the Super Saiyans introduces a planet existing "at the end of the universe" (宇宙の果て uchū no hate), which is then reiterated by the Supplementary Daizenshuu?
Right Ben it's all SymbolismNope sorry this one statement plus a shitty reasoning we have long since rejected as being meaningful, spherical universe, means no infinite universe obviously
In regards to spherical shit, quite literally yes lmfaoRight Ben it's all Symbolism
Don't we literally see the universes in the U6 saga when they summon super shenron and it's quite literally sphere-like universes, in real-time, with zero abstraction.
I think it was just to make the scene easier to understand
similar to how Marvel and DC do![]()
you think but why would they even bother, they could have just not shown it that way, not like it was relevant.
We had a thread were we decided not to abandon using them as accurate depictions.Don't we literally see the universes in the U6 saga when they summon super shenron and it's quite literally sphere-like universes, in real-time, with zero abstraction.
Right but in marvel and dc, earth is just straight up the center of the universe, so two earths colliding literally just is two universe about to kiss. It’s quite literalI think it was just to make the scene easier to understand
similar to how Marvel and DC do![]()
I know, it was more about shapesRight but in marvel and dc, earth is just straight up the center of the universe, so two earths colliding literally just is two universe about to kiss. It’s quite literal
Oh I'm well aware, not quite so sure you want my thoughts on that tho.We had a thread were we decided not to abandon using them as accurate depictions.
I mean I've yet to hear a counter argument for not using them that wasn't complete dog shitOh I'm well aware, not quite so sure you want my thoughts on that tho.
You're acting a bit frisky there lad, not sure you really want to be saying things like that given how non-lenient the wiki has been of late over much less egregious wording.I mean I've yet to hear a counter argument for not using them that wasn't complete dog shit
Calling bad arguements we've already sifted through and debunked and the inconsistencies we've already addressed as the bad arguements they are isn't frisky.You're acting a bit frisky there lad, not sure you really want to be saying things like that given how non-lenient the wiki has been of late over much less egregious wording.
Anyway, how about the dozens of contradictions?
Like straight up dozens of examples that vary from direct statements to literal visual proof?
Like it or not, there's definitely a massive degree of cherry picking going on, not to say all of it is wrong, not to say some of it isn't simply more consistent even, but all the same, it really isn't a one and done type of deal.
When did I say that?@Hasty12345 why did you say tier 2 db doesn't make any sense
...4 years ago
4 years ago
I always thought of the Macrocosm as 5D and the Overarching Timeline as 6D. This just made me realize Krillin would be 6D…..5th dimensional Krillin and Fat Gotenks if the CRT goes through is insane
Absolute cinema5th dimensional Krillin and Fat Gotenks if the CRT goes through is insane