-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
- Status
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
Yes because there are no baseline above 2-A.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,036
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #83
We are not closing the CRT before the staff come.
"Alien X's body has a pocket Universe which has its own Time and Causality disconnected from rest of Time"
Isnt this just 4D? Actually this might not even be HDE bro- Its just pocket dimension
Accidentally wiping something out is NOT passive. Like wtf??
- 9,982
- 10,819
He was 4D until the statement that he is so strong that he transcend our very plane of Existence came.
- 5,482
- 3,549
Upon checking it is possible for someone to contain a 4D plane of existence (3D+Time) within oneself without being 5D
What proof do we have that his pocket dimension scales beyond the ben 10 cosmology that is low 1-C?
because them having pocket dimension inside their body yet also existing within the world inside the world of Ben 10 is a heavy contradiction
I wouldn't say HDe should be removed but HDE being 5D is suspicious
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
Like I said, your comments don't to matter much if DT says so.agree to disagree anyway again.
But I already stated I disagree with DT reasoning, as long as standard doesn't contradict and supports what state I can move with it, if something is bigger than Infinite 3D that can't be contained in 3D structure and equates to 4D structure.
- 3,687
- 2,060
Not necessary actualy, you must make the infinite 3D as a subset or portion of it, that make that structure is much bigger in every part than the infinite 3D
- 3,566
- 879
Accidentally wiping out something is not passive but accidentally wiping out something due to your mere existence is passive.
Simple difference
- 5,482
- 3,549
Our plane of existence is 3D assorted into a film strip over time
in the end the plane of existence is still a 3D space with time and not 4D as a 4D space so no. transcending the plane of existence should be 4D only
if our plane of existence is 4D then we'll have hypercubes around us which isn't the case
- 3,687
- 2,060
3D space with time is 4D
- 3,566
- 879
It says that ben by just turning into Alien x can accidentally wipe out a mountain.
The moment Alien x b to exist = no mountain
How is that so hard to understand ?
Doesn't matter whatever it's passive or not doesn't change anything I said like really
- 3,566
- 879
Are you doing it on purpose ? The statement is so ******* obvious it doesn't really takes a genius to realise that
- 5,271
- 6,013
So are you suggesting a downgrade to tier 7? With all this hyperfixation on the mountain stuff it sure as hell seems so.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,036
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #100
No it is not obvious at all? If I say I accidently destroyed a glass would you think I did it on an accident or my mere presence destroyed it?
Thats not what I said tf? I am saying it just shows the card is not really a good source since it makes the character seem weaker
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
DT says what he says. I didn't know there was such a thing until I heard it from DT, but that's the thing.
- 9,982
- 10,819
Sorry but the Statement is "Alien X is so strong that he transcend our very plane of Existence". That's strawman to say it's linked to mountain Destroying or whatever, neither makes sense and is a assertion.
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,036
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #103
I am just shocked. Like these guys are arguing for passive 7-A AP for Alien X because of "he accidentally destroys a mountain" quote.
Thats not what I said. What I am saying is the card is not good enough source material as it makes Alien X seem like a Tier 6 character with him doing a 7-A feat. Plus transcending is not enough for HDE anyway
- 5,271
- 6,013
? Not really. It's just flavor text to make something sound cool.
- 513
- 284
The card was made during Alien Force before the show properly explored Celestialsapiens and their power
- 3,566
- 879
OMG it says Ben by JUST TURNING into Alien x is enough to wipe out a mountain. Literally Alien x appearance alone is enough to destroy a ******* mountain, that's what the statement says.....
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,053
- 5,983
Go to my thread and read it, he says it does not qualify simple as that, I am still arguing for it though.
He even said being infinitely larger than an infinite 3D construct does not mean HDE in the mathematical sense
- 5,271
- 6,013
Dude chill out. You're literally oozing salt rn with all of these aggressive posts.
Don't see how some flavor text to add a tone is some sort of antifeat?
So powerful he can accidentally destroy a mountain = cool sounding to children
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
I will ask something out of curiosity. How supported is the card game with the main series (it doesn't matter if it's Canon).
ShionAH
He/Him- 17,036
- 5,161
- Thread starter
- #111
No way wtf? It only says he accidentally wiped out a mountain nothing about presence or passive? Alien X if he had 7-A Passive AP which doesnt exist he would then destroy anything around him??
I am oozing salt after I saw you guys trying to give Alien X Idk Passive 7-A AP? Because he accidentally wiped out a mountain
Its not an antifeat for the 5th time. It just shows the card has no understanding in any dimension stuff and therefore not reliable.
- 513
- 284
It's not a card game, but a similiar one was used for Big Chill's absolute zero which is supported in-show IIRC.
TheKingStrategist13
He/Him- 1,317
- 1,180
As far as I know, Passive AP isn't even a proper term. Something more apt would be environmental destruction.
- 3,566
- 879
Also the quote wasn't even meant for HDE anyway, since the statement says that "Alien x is so powerful that he transcended our plane of existence"
It's literally reffering to his AP here so it should be used as a justification for low 1-C AP instead
It's literally reffering to his AP here so it should be used as a justification for low 1-C AP instead
- 5,271
- 6,013
Don't see how one can come to that conclusion? Seems like a strange comparison.
- 5,271
- 6,013
HDE was always there. It was literally added as supporting evidence. You are literally focusing on literal supporting evidence.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,724
- 3,121
I don't think we should go any further because we're drawing a circle. It's already 2 pages, we should wait for DT.
- Status
Similar threads
