https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXyb5y3loQc
Madara is more interesting for me honestly. I loved Aizen (and quit Bleach when he left), but Madara for me was more impressive and overall someone who I felt had more depth. The video I linked above only strengthened my view.
>He's like a poor-mans Aizen
Except not really. He and Aizen, aside from just being the second most OP villain in their series share not really that much in common. In fact I consider him better than Aizen
Madara being behind everything makes more sense going by the entire theme of Naruto, i.e Hatred, Conflict and Peace. It honestly makes him more interesting as it shows how influential his words are and how well he was able to convey his beliefs to others and have it basically spread like wildfire. This also leads to his revival and his defeat at the hands of Kaguya. Not to mention that he wasn't blind to his own flaws. He knew of the contradictions in his goal. Getting rid of conflict meant getting rid of battle, something he himself enjoyed beyond belief. He knew what he was doing, but he still pushed on through it. Even though the way he did so was nowhere near the best way to accomplish the goal.
The video above explains everything in detail.
>Every character is objectively better than a Fairy Tail Character
I vehemently disagree here. Like FT wasn't the best, but the characters it had were enjoyable overall. Something that I;ll argue. Not to mention there is no objectivity here, only subjectivity. People see stuff differently, so I wouldn't appreciate someone saying these characters are the objectively worst characters, which basically means, "if you like these characters more than others, you are objectively wrong despite this being the subjective". This is the nice way of saying what I really want to say to that comment.