Addition of "Multiple Arms" for Powers and Abilities

[Bobsican]

I don't think "aka" should be used on a page as that's way too unprofessional for our purposes.
I also don't see a purpose for a types subsection with a single type that'd probably fit better as a possible use either way.
And it seems rather weird to separate examples by media when this doesn't really matter for the power and is quite out of standard.

 

[Antvasima]

I don't think "aka" should be used on a page as that's way too unprofessional for our purposes.

I replaced it with "also called".

I also don't see a purpose for a types subsection with a single type that'd probably fit better as a possible use either way.
And it seems rather weird to separate examples by media when this doesn't really matter for the power and is quite out of standard.

I am not sure exactly what you have in mind here, but I unlocked the page for editing if it is necessary.

 

[Bobsican]

I am not sure exactly what you have in mind here, but I unlocked the page for editing if it is necessary.

Well, I'd suggest for the rest to basically:

• Remove the separations by media in the examples and just list everything together
• Remove the Types section and merge its only case with the Possible Uses subsection

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. That seems fine to me at least. I think that you can apply those changes if you wish.

 

[Bobsican]

Done.

 

[Antvasima]

The page currently looks good to me at least.

Is there anything left to do here, or should we close this thread?

 

[Jinx666]

Only really to link and add the power to the many profiles it applies to

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, that is true, but do we need this thread open for that purpose? Isn't it better to start a new content revision thread instead?

 

[Bobsican]

It'd be better to do that, yes.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Is somebody here willing to start a content revision thread to ask for help with this project, to then link to the new thread here?

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

Okay. Is somebody here willing to start a content revision thread to ask for help with this project, to then link to the new thread here?

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Is somebody here willing to start a content revision thread to ask for help with this project, to then link to the new thread here?

@Jinx666 @Bobsican

Was this ever handled properly?

 

[Bobsican]

I recall in the meantime Jinx666 added the power to qualifying pages, and the word spread out and there's a notable amount of users with the power now, namely over 200, so it'd be reasonable to claim there's nothing more to do here.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I will close this thread then.

Thank you to everybody who helped out here.