Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
did you forget that they already stated the difference between layers are at least a dimensional difference apart? The album I already posted previouslyMatthew Schroeder said:And I agree with the Imgur comment over the lack of context. It could honestly just be High 3-A, for all I know.
If that was all that was required for 1-A, quite a few High 1-Bs would have been there, for a looooong time.Ryukama said:Haven't we always treated dreaming something as being transcendental of it though?
In that context, but in that scene you posted the "World of infinite layers" appears to be just one universe.Iapitus The Impaler said:did you forget that they already stated the difference between layers are at least a dimensional difference apart? The album I already posted previously
And, I'm sorry, but this makes absolutely no sense.Matthew Schroeder said:You can have infinite levels of transcending over baseline High 1-B and still be High 1-B.
And you can be 1-A without infinite dimensions.
I can't speak for the Masadaverse, but in TM's context, it's more akin to "no actual cosmological model using any number of dimensions can actually describe or properly categorize these beings", which is different to just transcending the basic requirements for High 1-B.Ryukama said:I don't see how transcending infinite dimensions isn't 1-A, especially when things like Tenchi or Masadaverse can get 1-A ratings without ever remotely mentioning anything close to infinite dimensions. But whatever.
Because the transcendence must be conceptual. If them dreaming results in a conceptual transcendence of the hierarchy, then its 1-A. Otherwise, its usually a higher degree of High 1-B.Ryukama said:I don't see how transcending infinite dimensions isn't 1-A, especially when things like Tenchi or Masadaverse can get 1-A ratings without ever remotely mentioning anything close to infinite dimensions. But whatever.
that was a typo.Matthew Schroeder said:>High 1-A
No.
As for this, I agree. There must be more proof, more context, right? That sounds like it could even just be 5D depending on the context. I'm sure y'all got some context that backs it up, perhaps some implication that space referse to axial dimensions?Ryukama said:I also find being transdual and "beyond the concepts of space and time" to be too vague for 1-A. At least for the insanely high stanard we are putting many different 1-As on. But whatever.
Because infinity + infinity =/= "beyond the very idea of infinity" or "completely free of all forms of dimensional boundaries".Ryukama said:^ How does entirely transcending infinite dimensions, or being infinite levels of transcendence over infinite dimensions, not count as this?