• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan said:
@Jasonsith In your calc of smashing through a interior wall, you got several values wrong. Firstly, those values for reinforced concrete are incorrect (those are tensile strength instead of shear and compressive), you can refer to my destruction values blog. Secondly, 8 j/cc, 64 j/cc and 214 j/cc is for rock, not cement. For some reason it was incorrectly put as cement on our Calculations page.
@everyone Which blogs need to be evaluated atm?
Actually it's 69 for v frag and 214.35 for pulv. but oh well.

Also I think NarutoForums used cement and concrete as one and the same.
 
A building has collapsed in LEGO City! Start the new rescue helicopter! Hey! Build the helicopter! And off to the rescue! Prepare the lifeline! Lower the stretcher! And make the rescue! The new emergency collection from LEGO City.
 
Seems okay enough.

Also shear strength is what we use for frag, to figure that out for non-metals, half or 60% of UTS.
 
KLOL506 said:
Seems okay enough.
Also shear strength is what we use for frag, to figure that out for non-metals, half or 60% of UTS.
Shear strength is for making something dent and not return back to original shape.

I wonder if we mean destruction UTS should be applied instead.

I have added one more for mere "permanently denting".
 
No, we don't use UTS for our values. Low-end shear strength is used for frag, high-end shear strength or low-end unilaxial compressive strength is used for v.frag and high-end compressive strength is used for pulverization.
 
Based on the calc here it takes 63000 N (6,4 tonnes of force) to smash through brick, which would make everyone capable of doing so Class 10.

Just wondering what you guys thought on this.
 
Wonder his strong you need to he to cause the moon to get an asynchronous rotation in spin-orbit resonance and would a character who did it by crashing into it get a lifting strength feat as well?
 
Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan said:
That's for punching brick and does not scale to lifting strength.
Force feats get used for lifting strength all the time here, though

Like with the MK cast and the Predators, or others who can tear a person's spine along with their skull, that's pulling force yet it gets used as lifting strength. If an arm can exert 6 metric tons of force and withstand said force, I would say it's easy to accept that the arm can then lift that much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top