- 1,281
- 150
I haven't seen you in a long time? Pardon me?
I was in the discord
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't seen you in a long time? Pardon me?
Don't ask questions =/= Understood perfectly (especially when its an FRA CHAIN)Define "a lot" because literally only like 2 or 3 people here dont understand it while most of us who actually paid attention to the thread understand it nicely.
you have to be kidding me…But nice dissing me and Everything, who have both actively tried to understand your stance, something you really can't say for most of the people who agreed.
Who on EARTH said that????
you bragged about how you were a loud minority and that most people who agreed “haven’t actively tried to understand your stance” (aka the CRT’s premise and reasoning)who have both actively tried to understand your stance, something you really can't say for most of the people who agreed.
I'm sorry but you are so utterly confused about what i said you should really just sit tight and be quiet.you bragged about how you were a loud minority and that most people who agreed “haven’t actively tried to understand your stance” (aka the CRT’s premise and reasoning)
you literally accused the people who agree of going “hurr durr FRA” which is in every way an attempt to delegitimise the fact the vote is against you
can we please just stop this and move onto something constructive… anything else I’m just moving to Private Convos from here on out
Idk I just want this to get back on trackBro what is happening right now?
Solid for meIdk I just want this to get back on track
is there an update on the vote tally for possibly vs solid?
Ctrl + P, then insert url of the image.How do I post pictures here?
Just gonna add that this is basically confirmed in Pokemon: Mystery Dungeon, DIalga's realm exists in-between the "fractions of split seconds". Of course it's depicted very differently visually but the same idea should carry over.Dialga is most likely the between time, the timestream between the moments in time.
I just mentioned Arceus Vs Archie sonicJust gonna add that this is basically confirmed in Pokemon: Mystery Dungeon, DIalga's realm exists in-between the "fractions of split seconds". Of course it's depicted very differently visually but the same idea should carry over.
Aside from this, the derailing messages have to stop. That includes meme posts and any posts that solely complain about other members/other verses (Archie Sonic in particular). That's not the place for this, and I'll be deleting any such messages on sight from now on.
Vs threads are for another date. They just add nothing to CRTs lol.I just mentioned Arceus Vs Archie sonic
What's the exact question regarding the FAQ?Let's wait for DontTalk please, so we do not make a mistake in either direction.
This one.What's the exact question regarding the FAQ?
Ok, but what's the question about what is written there?
Basically the thing is if is needed a statement of infinite transcendence of space-time to get Low 1-C, as the FAQ says is not needed, but Tiering page yes. Thanks to the FAQ Archie Verse got Low 1-C as it fits the FAQ, which just asks superiority in nature to 4D space-time, without the need of the infinite transcendence statement.Ok, but what's the question about what is written there?
It needs "superiority in nature", not just superiority alone, as the page states. That, IMO as just one of the people who wrote on that page, is probably to be taken to mean qualitative superiority. See the last paragraph of the "what is transcendent"-section as for what qualitative superiority means.Basically the thing is if is needed a statement of infinite transcendence of space-time to get Low 1-C, as the FAQ says is not needed, but Tiering page yes. Thanks to the FAQ Archie Verse got Low 1-C as it fits the FAQ, which just asks superiority in nature to 4D space-time, without the need of the infinite transcendence statement.
I guess the issue is solved then.It needs "superiority in nature", not just superiority alone, as the page states. That, IMO as just one of the people who wrote on that page, is probably to be taken to mean qualitative superiority. See the last paragraph of the "what is transcendent"-section as for what qualitative superiority means.
Actually, pretty sure we wanted to do clarifications regarding that stuff in this thread (reformulating it to qualitative superiority in particular), but just never finished it because... too much stuff is going on at once, I guess.
It caused confusions, but here I read again:So if I got it right, one page says that you need explicit evidence that it has an infinite superiority of space-time, while another allows for one to use evidence that points towards it but doesn't explicitly say it? Or do I misunderstand the issue?
Yes.So…. Is that all the issues around it not being Low 1-C sorted or…
Yes, needs just to be unlocked.So 5D Arceus now?
Former, more votes were for it.are we going definite or possibly?
I voted solidare we going definite or possibly?
Thank you for helping out. I responded to the other thread.It needs "superiority in nature", not just superiority alone, as the page states. That, IMO as just one of the people who wrote on that page, is probably to be taken to mean qualitative superiority. See the last paragraph of the "what is transcendent"-section as for what qualitative superiority means.
Actually, pretty sure we wanted to do clarifications regarding that stuff in this thread (reformulating it to qualitative superiority in particular), but just never finished it because... too much stuff is going on at once, I guess.