• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

9-C durability for the toys?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bobsican said:
The 9-C stuff is an outlier, so it can't be taken into account, so overall, just "At least 10-A+", as said before, would be the best option here.
Click to expand...
Well technically you can't really call either an outlier as they only have 2 durability feats
 
Well, all three of their durability feats were a hard plastic toy taking blunt damage. So in real life they'd probably be a lot more damaged by these things.
 
I made a profile for Emmet from TLM, and I was wondering if his irl durability would be comparable to Toy Story's (I need a LEGO Movie VS Toy Story matchup so badly)
 
Btw, if I may leave my opinion. I think that saying they're 9-C durability when it comes to blunt damage is fine. However, this should only be with blunt damage. They're particularly not durable to sharp objects, as the prospector shows, and the fact that Woody kinda gets injured due to sharp objects a few times iirc, I think that happened in TS2? Either way that sounds like a good compromise
 
Woody is obviously plush. He sort of just...squeezes under pressure, and his Type 2 Immortality allows him to survive this.
 
Jackythejack said:
Btw, if I may leave my opinion. I think that saying they're 9-C durability when it comes to blunt damage is fine. However, this should only be with blunt damage. They're particularly not durable to sharp objects, as the prospector shows, and the fact that Woody kinda gets injured due to sharp objects a few times iirc, I think that happened in TS2? Either way that sounds like a good compromise
Click to expand...
We can probably just make a note of that in their weaknesses section, although I'm pretty sure toys made of hard plastic likely wouldn't be weak to that
 
Okay. I suppose that it is probably fine to apply then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Soupywolf5
Wood vs Wasp (3-0-0)
Replies
18
Views
2K
Hortonhearsahoot
Hortonhearsahoot
Flowerguy2
"Who are you calling "toy", TOYS?" Woody and Buzz VS Slappy (Goosebumps Film Series) [0-0-0]
Replies
2
Views
920
Flowerguy2
Flowerguy2
Flashlight237
Lots'O'Hugs For Everyone! (Lotso vs Huggy Bear)
Replies
1
Views
755
Flashlight237
Flashlight237
Phsccarvalho
  • Locked
Woody Woodpecker: Low 2-C, more Plot Manipulation and more Hax
2 3
Replies
93
Views
5K
Phsccarvalho
Phsccarvalho
Phsccarvalho
  • Locked
Woody Woodpecker CRT: "Animator Worlds" 5-D and 6-D
Replies
32
Views
3K
Phsccarvalho
Phsccarvalho
Back
Top