9-C durability for the toys?

[Soupywolf5]

The 9-C stuff is an outlier, so it can't be taken into account, so overall, just "At least 10-A+", as said before, would be the best option here.

Well technically you can't really call either an outlier as they only have 2 durability feats

 

[Joaco0902]

And the feats are stupidly close so....

 

[Joaco0902]

Bump

 

[Joaco0902]

Bump

 

[Soupywolf5]

Bump

 

[Joaco0902]

Bump

 

[Soupywolf5]

Bump

 

[Joaco0902]

bump

 

[Joaco0902]

Bump

 

[Soupywolf5]

Bump

 

[Joaco0902]

Bump

 

[Soupywolf5]

Bump

 

[Soupywolf5]

Bump (Also the TV calc's been redone, and still got 9-C results)

 

[Joaco0902]

That's great!

 

[Soupywolf5]

Bump

 

[Joaco0902]

Bump

 

[BigSmoke4269]

Sooooo...are TS' durability feats actually realistic? Like, would an actual toy be capable of surviving these things?

 

[Soupywolf5]

Well, all three of their durability feats were a hard plastic toy taking blunt damage. So in real life they'd probably be a lot more damaged by these things.

 

[BigSmoke4269]

What about Zurg

 

[Soupywolf5]

What about him?

 

[BigSmoke4269]

Didn't he fall down an elevator shaft?

 

[Soupywolf5]

Yeah, and it was calc'd and got 9-C results

 

[BigSmoke4269]

So what if I dropped a LEGO person down an elevator shaft?

 

[Soupywolf5]

They'd probably be too light to get any real KE and not much would happen Where's this going?

 

[Jackythejack]

A lego figure would be too light

 

[BigSmoke4269]

I made a profile for Emmet from TLM, and I was wondering if his irl durability would be comparable to Toy Story's (I need a LEGO Movie VS Toy Story matchup so badly)

 

[Joaco0902]

Iirc there once was a profile for Emmet, I don't know why but it was nuked.

 

[Jackythejack]

Nah he's still here.

Emmet (The LEGO Movie)

 

[BigSmoke4269]

Actually, I made that one. The old one was nuked because apparently it had unreliable statistics or something

 

[Jackythejack]

Btw, if I may leave my opinion. I think that saying they're 9-C durability when it comes to blunt damage is fine. However, this should only be with blunt damage. They're particularly not durable to sharp objects, as the prospector shows, and the fact that Woody kinda gets injured due to sharp objects a few times iirc, I think that happened in TS2? Either way that sounds like a good compromise

 

[BigSmoke4269]

Woody is obviously plush. He sort of just...squeezes under pressure, and his Type 2 Immortality allows him to survive this.

 

[Jackythejack]

I suppose, but it's good to note that for the ones that aren't made of plastic

 

[Soupywolf5]

Btw, if I may leave my opinion. I think that saying they're 9-C durability when it comes to blunt damage is fine. However, this should only be with blunt damage. They're particularly not durable to sharp objects, as the prospector shows, and the fact that Woody kinda gets injured due to sharp objects a few times iirc, I think that happened in TS2? Either way that sounds like a good compromise

We can probably just make a note of that in their weaknesses section, although I'm pretty sure toys made of hard plastic likely wouldn't be weak to that

 

[Joaco0902]

Bump

 

[Soupywolf5]

Bump

 

[Antvasima]

What are the conclusions here.

 

[Soupywolf5]

I think everyone is fine with the upgrade?

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I suppose that it is probably fine to apply then.

 

[Joaco0902]

Okay, I applied the upgrade.

This can be closed now.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thanks.