I don't need to send scans for this. But for your arguments to prove "qualitative superiority" you need more screening and clarification. Otherwise, these statements quantitatively explain the superiority.(not qualitative)
It's more like fire dews giving life to reality.
He always disagree with anything related to maou so
You should not be doing or saying this
that's exactly what i said .There is insufficient statement and evidence for R>F transcendence
It's clear cut Bubble Worlds Existence can't be perceived by Silver Bubbles inhabitants. It's stated as impossible to prove its existence.
Supporting Evidences.
Well Fixxed explanation is better than mine I guess I am not good at English so.
Why are you only focusing on the insignificance part? Clearly the amount of fire dew in them (the power of their reality) is so small that it is impossible to prove their existence. Of course, that would be to see them as almost non-existent.
I'm bored answering this, and I'm sure everyone on this thread is bored too...
Yes, it can be. But that's not the case here.
...
Because all assumptions (seeing as non-existence and impossible) are based on this. Seeing a reality as impossible and incalculable does not mean seeing it as non-existence. That is, these expressions are not sufficient for qualitative superiority.
It's already been said to be insufficient. Why are you still defending the same arguments?
This is exactly what the scale is based on. This topic is the skeleton of the scale, and if the argument for the topic is insufficient, the scale is also insufficient.
This has to do with physics, because it is said to "transcend order (the earth) by physical force".
Statements speak more of a "quantitative superiority".That's why, he need more than that.
Can you please stop spamming this quantitative superiority shit and make actual arguments thats refutes the evidence given here? As far as i am aware Bubble worlds are 5D and infinite in size . Being stated to be smaller than silver bubbles would basically mean the silver bubbles are bigger which should qualify for 6D.
It is not enough to "see infinitely small" or "to see it as insignificant and impossible".
The impossibility of determining this entity can be abstract, physical, metaphysical, or conceptual, as I mentioned earlier. You should know this. They've already explained, still stop presenting the same arguments.
It doesn't need to be infinitely smaller than the other. Being bigger than infinite would be uncountable infinite which is what the silver bubbles would be compared to bubble worlds as bubbles are smaller than silver bubbles until they are evolved. Your arguments only goes against our standards . I advise you to read the FAQ page again.
To be greater than infinity is not to be uncountably infinite XDXDXD. So let most characters that get baseline in layer 2-A be Low 1-C
Did you just concede
What exactly does this metaphysical, conceptual blah blah had to do with anything i said. At this point you are Just strawmaning this thread with these discord debates lol.
Ofc noDid you just concede
Ain't no way you just said that . I'm not even gonna take you serious anymore as you don't even know wiki standards and keep arguing against it.
It is enough to be conceptually or metaphysically superior to appear incalculable and insignificant. But this is not enough for qualitative superiority.
At this point you are strawmaning the thread & stop spamming same words like random bullshit gg. Already a staff is willing to evaluate because of you they might run away.
This wiki doesn't say that being greater than infinity = uncountable infinity. Just baseline.Saying that, you're the one who doesn't care about wiki standards. It's really annoying to deal with toxic fans.
Just so someone disagrees with you they are toxic ? Wow Great way to seek attention.
I'm not diverting the topic. I'm just saying that it's insufficient, there are many possibilities and assumptions.
I don't have to agree. This is a discussion area.
Sooo Pain Sama~~ tell me what I should be doing rn.
Stop being so aggressive , it might not be pleasant for you. you should not talk to people who disagree with you in a "derogatory" approach.
I don't quite agree with that. They can both be countably infinitely large, and the Silver Bubble can be bigger than the Bubble World. For example, if we divide a universe of countably infinite size into two pieces, and then divide one of the pieces into two more pieces, some of them will look bigger than others in terms of appearance. But they will all still be countably infinitely large. At least that is how I interpret it with my knowledge of infinity
My bad , i should have used the word "countable infinite" instead but that doesn't change anything as a structure can't be bigger than infinite while still being infinite.I don't quite agree with that. They can both be countably infinitely large, and the Silver Bubble can be bigger than the Bubble World. For example, if we divide a universe of countably infinite size into two pieces, and then divide one of the pieces into two more pieces, some of them will look bigger than others in terms of appearance. But they will all still be countably infinitely large. At least that is how I interpret it with my knowledge of infinity
Yes, you don't have to agree. However, if other users don't find your reasons for disagreeing plausible, there's no need to continue this.
Users are not important to me(don't misunderstand.), admins are important and no one (Admins) has said they will join so far.
???
It would be appreciated if you give an warning to all who are participating in this thread to stop arguing until @Firestorm808 replies.
. I don't want this thread to be go one forever. I am fine if Firestorms and Other staff agrees or disagrees but Atleast normal members should reply when a staff makes their reply. Man the scans & argument posted will be hard to read if @Georredannea15 just spams same thing again and again
@Firestorm808 didn't say agreed with the topic.???
@Firestorm808 doesn't seem to have admin to you ?
I already suggested you to drop your condensing attitude and wait for his reply to my comments. You are now just spamming and derailing the thread for no reason without letting an admin to evaluate it. i will just report you if i see another comment from you which doesn't contribute anything here.
It would be appreciated if you give an warning to all who are participating in this thread to stop arguing until @Firestorm808 replies.
@Georredannea15 arguments are repeating and no one except @MaxLevel_King agreed with his interpretation. He will keep derailing if no staff warns him
For the love of God just stop it. Whenever you try to reply back you change others wording.
"Stop Replying until he Completes his Evaluation." That's the most sensible sentence you've ever said on the subject.
No. Silver Bubbles are never stated to be larger than Bubble Worlds. All Worlds (Bubble Worlds and Silver Bubbles) in the Silver Sea are also sometimes addressed as "Small Worlds".
