- 11,416
- 2,551
Explain.Apophatic theology is a completely unrelated thing that has no connection to hierarchies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Explain.Apophatic theology is a completely unrelated thing that has no connection to hierarchies.
No.Explain.
Irrelevant. Guess there are no more counterarguments then.
Yes, beyond what I stated earlier, I am subscribing to the "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" school of thought. Meaning, the higher tiers that are suggested to be applied, the more scrutiny we need to place on properly critically evaluating the supposed evidence involved.I don't think Ant is intentionally being rude or malicious, just a misunderstanding on his side and i know him long enough to say so, since to be fair this upgrade is a huge one, up to 1-A, then Elizhaa proposed High 1-A due to Apophatic Theology. Ant always has been being conservative when it come to a huge upgrade like this, and while i agree that comment from him is an unneccessary one, don't be hard on him....
rest bro, you need it, and it is not like this thread gone anywhere, people still debatingAlso, I am in an irritable mood due to my Cortisol levels building up from not having sufficient amounts of free time for exercise lately and going on a diet in combination.
???Irrelevant. Guess there are no more counterarguments then.
On the previous CRT, it's already been discussed and agreed upon that using Buddhism RELIGION as the foundation of any upgrades is absolutely not allowed no matter what. The whole reason Sun Wukong's Profile did not get deleted is that we adhered to that rule and even though they used similar and basically copy and pasted text, it was still present in the novel's own context.He made a short post on the thread which you can go and read but ok
But fine, if you two are going to argue using real Buddhism concepts then I will counter-argue using real Buddhism concepts then let's do some comparisons. This is using the Flower Sutra which focuses on Mahayana Buddhism specifically, the exact same type of Buddhism most prevalent in JTTW.He interpreted the novel's text to conclude that a single person contains all of existence within themselves and pointed out the paradox in that. He brought up other examples as well(such as a mustard seed containing the Sumeru) and talked about how it relates to the principle of all things being interconnected.
Buddha's whole realm is in a grain of sand. - Journey to the West Volume 1, Page 306, Chapter 14
They enjoy in peace the Pure Land's Jetavana, The Dragon Palace, and worlds vast as Ganges' sands. - Journey to the West Volume 1, Page 203, Chapter 8
The atoms to which these buddha-lands are reduced in an instant
are unspeakable,
And so are the atoms of continuous reduction moment to
moment
Going on for untold eons;
These atoms contain lands unspeakably many.
And the atoms in these lands are even harder to tell of.
Counting this way for unspeakable eons,
Using unspeakable numbers,
Counting eons by these atoms. - Flower Ornament Scripture Page 892
Mahayana Buddhism is not metaphorical, Buddha-Lands hold Infinite Worlds within them very clearly, moving on to the Second Comparison;The Buddha appears everywhere,
In infinite lands in each atom,
The realms therein being all infinite too; - Flower Ornament Scripture Page 133
A feather swallows the great ocean? A mustard seed holds the Sumeru? - Journey to the West Volume 1, Page 201, Chapter 8
Third Comparison;Third, the difference in inconceivable spiritual powers: according to
the Vimalakirti Scripture's explanation of the spiritual powers of enlight-
ening beings, they can fit a huge mountain into a mustard seed - Flower Ornament Scripture, Introduction
The dharmakiiya Has no shape or form: One pearl-like radiance holding myriad things. - Journey to the West Volume 1, Page 306, Chapter 14
Such are these various Buddhas in all the worlds. - Journey to the West Volume 4, Page 385, Chapter 100
they see all things as one form which is
formless, and yet do not destroy the identities of things — they abide in
real Thusness, never leaving it. - Flower Ornament Scripture Page 820
Myriad things are like this — far and near, high and low,
broad and narrow, coarse and fine, even down to the tiniest grain of sand
and mote of dust, all being beautiful jewels, clearly mirroring lights, all
reflected in the orb of the sun, and all reflecting and rereflecting each
other; these reflections, neither increasing nor decreasing, neither merged
nor separated, are clearly visible as though they were the original sub-
stance itself. - Flower Ornament Scripture Page 841
In every world are immense numbers
of Buddhas who each attract ten great enlightening beings, one from
each of the ten directions, who in turn are each accompanied by countless
enlightening beings. - Flower Ornament Scripture, Introduction
From what I can tell there are two Great Ways mentioned in JTTW, one is the Dao, and the other is the Mahayana. You can see it in the way they are mentioned."The Great Way" indeed refers to The Dao, and not The Mahayana. In actuality, Subhoti insinuates that The Dao or The Great Way is truthfully inferior to The Dharma and encompassed by it. As well as the fact that within the Jenner translation and others, "The Great Way" is translated separately from "The Mahayana".
No he isn't holy shit. He is simply using the novel text for his argument and linking it to an actual Buddhist concept just shows that it isn't intellectually dishonest. Even the translator's notes agree with that.Ultima is attempting to compare what is said in the novel to what is stated outside the novel as the entire basis of a downgrade/redo of cosmology. I think that is unacceptable considering how "Harsh" staff have been with wanting to separate the religious aspect of JTTW and everything else.
These descriptions seem fundamentally incompatible considering JTTW seems to treat a mustard seed containing the Sumeru as a fundamental truth that can only be seen in a state of enlightenment, while the Mahayana seem to treat it as a showcase of power of spiritual beings.Mahayana Buddhism is not metaphorical, Buddha-Lands hold Infinite Worlds within them very clearly, moving on to the Second Comparison;
It does not matter what the actual Buddhist Concepts say. Unless he finds something in the novel to prove his point then all he has is speculation and guessing. Nothing he's stated proves anything in JTTW is metaphorical when they admit and acknowledge these multiple worlds exist. And I can't belive you are still clinging to that paradox translartor statement when it's already been debunked.No he isn't holy shit. He is simply using the novel text for his argument and linking it to an actual Buddhist concept just shows that it isn't intellectually dishonest. Even the translator's notes agree with that.
You are being ridiculous and wrong, especially when the Translator explains that it is from the Mahayana Buddhism Cosmology.These descriptions seem fundamentally incompatible considering JTTW seems to treat a mustard seed containing the Sumeru as a fundamental truth that can only be seen in a state of enlightenment, while the Mahayana seem to treat it as a showcase of power of spiritual beings.
The main point was from the novel itself as I said. Other things were supplementary.It does not matter what the actual Buddhist Concepts say. Unless he finds something in the novel to prove his point then all he has is speculation and guessing. Nothing he's stated proves anything in JTTW is metaphorical when they admit and acknowledge these multiple worlds exist. And I can't belive you are still clinging to that paradox translartor statement when it's already been debunked.
That doesn't address what I said. Mahayana interpretation seems fundamentally incompatible with the text's intent.You are being ridiculous and wrong, especially when the Translator explains that it is from the Mahayana Buddhism Cosmology.
Nothing Ultima has said proves anything so please explain what you are talking about.The main point was from the novel itself as I said. Other things were supplementary.
Incompatible in what way? Do you mean it conflicts with what you two "Want" it's interpretations to mean?That doesn't address what I said. Mahayana interpretation seems fundamentally incompatible with the text's intent.
He pointed out how the text says that a single person somehow contains all of existence within them and the paradox it causes along with other examples such as a mustard seed somehow containing THE Sumeru mountain (and not just a smaller variation of it).Nothing Ultima has said proves anything so please explain what you are talking about.
Good sir JTTW text says that a mustard seed contains the Sumeru and you need to be enlightened to see these truths while the Mahayana text says that enlightened beings can fit a mountain in a mustard seed as a showcase of power. I am sure you can see the difference here.Incompatible in what way? Do you mean it conflicts with what you two "Want" it's interpretations to mean?
Are you seriously confused why the Dharmakaya, the unity of Infinite Buddhas, a formless, nondual body beyond even transdual and acausal entities is stated to contain all of existence within them?He pointed out how the text says that a single person somehow contains all of existence within them and the paradox it causes along with other examples such as a mustard seed somehow containing THE Sumeru mountain (and not just a smaller variation of it).
They are both talking about enlightened beings...Good sir JTTW text says that a mustard seed contains the Sumeru and you need to be enlightened to see these truths while the Mahayana text says that enlightened beings can fit a mountain in a mustard seed as a showcase of power. I am sure you can see the difference here.
Not only that but Golden Dhuta is as the Translator Notes describedA feather swallows the great ocean? A mustard seed holds the Sumeru? Golden Dhuta is gently smiling. The enlightened transcends the ten stops and three wains.
Mahakasyapa is also known as Buddha's disciple who is enlightened. So no they correlate perfectly, isn't that crazy?One of Sakyamuni's principal disciples who was also chief of the ascetics before the enlightenment, with another and more familiar name of Mahakasyapa.
Personally, I would rather not wait for what Jasonith is doing. He has no idea when or if it will ever be done, and it's a personal project that won't apply to anything unless he deems it so and makes a separate CRT.I feel that a long-term project concerning Journey to the West as Jasonsith suggested may be the best solution.
This should be separateI feel that a long-term project concerning Journey to the West as Jasonsith suggested may be the best solution.
I'm still questioning if what Ultima is attempting to do is against the rules or not. As I said before he is using real-life Buddhism and its sources to debunk a novel. No matter how you argue it, relating the novel to real-life religious concepts is not allowed.Well, we should preferably wait for Ultima at least.
Has anybody written a post with all of the relevant evidence for him to evaluate already?
That is a good point. He should preferably stick to only evaluating what was said in the novel itself.I'm still questioning if what Ultima is attempting to do is against the rules or not. As I said before he is using real-life Buddhism and its sources to debunk a novel. No matter how you argue it, relating the novel to real-life religious concepts is not allowed.
I mean, he did something similar to that. I could tell as I have done something similar awhile back.That is a good point. He should preferably stick to only evaluating what was said in the novel itself.
However, I do not know if your interpretation of what he did is accurate or not.
First that's not my argument, second proof that the text was talking about this Dharmakaya or whatever? All it said is that in a single body and mind all dharmas are the same.Are you seriously confused why the Dharmakaya, the unity of Infinite Buddhas, a formless, nondual body beyond even transdual and acausal entities is stated to contain all of existence within them?
You didn't catch my point. One is stating that Mustard seeds being able to contain a mountain is a fundamental truth, other is saying that enlightened beings can compress (supposedly) mountains in a seed a show of power.They are both talking about enlightened beings...
You just do not listen. Firstly the translation Ultima used as a "Cross Reference" is less accurate than the one we currently use and it takes precedence over it with that one only being used for secondary evidence at best.First that's not my argument, second proof that the text was talking about this Dharmakaya or whatever? All it said is that in a single body and mind all dharmas are the same
Yours is the dharmakāya of True Mind.
The dharmakāya
Has no shape or form:
One pearl-like radiance holding myriad things.
I should not have to explain to you that although not perfectly, both are clearly derivative of one another, or else they wouldn't use the mustard seed as an example. The Translator confirms it's from the Mahayana and you have no proof of it being otherwise so please drop this argument.You didn't catch my point. One is stating that Mustard seeds being able to contain a mountain is a fundamental truth, other is saying that enlightened beings can compress (supposedly) mountains in a seed a show of power.
Ultima used 2 translations and the text you posted has 0 connection to the text Ultima posted. Besides I am not sure on what basis you claim one translation is better than another.You just do not listen. Firstly the translation Ultima used as a "Cross Reference" is less accurate than the one we currently use and it takes precedence over it with that one only being used for secondary evidence at best.
Brother in Christ both are completely and utterly different. If you insinuate that these 2 are related then you can use this to argue that the so called "hierarchies" are simply feats of space compression on various degrees since the Mahayana text you posted talks about compressing mountains into mustard seeds instead of the latter containing the former by default.I should not have to explain to you that although not perfectly, both are clearly derivative of one another, or else they wouldn't use the mustard seed as an example. The Translator confirms it's from the Mahayana and you have no proof of it being otherwise so please drop this argument.
Ok that's it I'm done. I've already explained myself enough, I'll be busy getting more staff input and if Ultima wants to continue his arguments he's free to. I'm not going to do this back and forth with someone who is deadset on ignoring what I say.Ultima used 2 translations and the text you posted has 0 connection to the text Ultima posted. Besides I am not sure on what basis you claim one translation is better than another.
That's your perspective though. From my perspective you have literally failed to even understand what I have been saying for the past few days(?). I doubt you even tried to understand, as all your so called "debunks" were completely unrelated to what I said 90% of the time. But mehOk that's it I'm done. I've already explained myself enough, I'll be busy getting more staff input and if Ultima wants to continue his arguments he's free to. I'm not going to do this back and forth with someone who is deadset on ignoring what I say.
Are you talking about this?That's your perspective though. From my perspective you have literally failed to even understand what I have been saying for the past few days(?). I doubt you even tried to understand, as all your so called "debunks" were completely unrelated to what I said 90% of the time. But meh
Did you read my Cosmology page? Because if you did this would make a lot more sense.A grain of sand the chiliocosm holds;
One mind or body's like ten thousand things.
To know this you must grasp the No-mind Spell;
Ok but the text says that one's mind or body containing all of existence is a truth that can only be realised by entering the so called "no mind" state, then why wouldn't this also mean that the statements about smaller things containing larger things are also referring to this very concept? Especially when it says a mustard seed contains THE Sumeru mountain (the "the" meaning that it isn't a small variation of said mountain but actually the mountain itself).It's by realizing all forms are one, this is explained through the novel showing recursions of nonexistence, information of existence and nonexistence, forms within emptiness, formlessness within form, touch, mind, and body, etc are all one. This is mentioned in the No-Mind Spell/Heart Sutra which is referred to in the novel.
Simply put as it says, in the beginning, Buddha and Mind are one, and only when you view both as nothing do you reach Nirvana and the Dharmakaya. There is the bodiless body, meaning the body that is truly nothing is the true body. Just as it explains The Dharmakaya has no form or shape, it is not a part of the void, nor non-non emptiness.
All of this is adding up to show how disconnected the Dharmakaya and Nirvana is from everything else, separate from Buddhas who are still part of the Dharma and Bodhisattva's who still have not grasped the No-Mind Spell.
It's nothing new all I did was reiterate what Ultima said.Can you explain your analysis/more important views regarding this topic in a single post here please, @Darksmash ?
Okay. No problem.It's nothing new all I did was reiterate what Ultima said.
Thank you for helping out.I'm neutral on the 1-A stuff.
I agree with Sun Wukong's possible Tier addition via SIze Manipulation, and the Statistics Amplification seems fine. Though the infinite lifting strength and speed due to the staff thing is weird. It said it grew to 10 thousand feat in the scan.
Because it's only after the statements reveal that grains of sand contain worlds and buddha-realms that they admit there is more than one world and worlds beyond measure.Ok but the text says that one's mind or body containing all of existence is a truth that can only be realised by entering the so called "no mind" state, then why wouldn't this also mean that the statements about smaller things containing larger things are also referring to this very concept? Especially when it says a mustard seed contains THE Sumeru mountain (the "the" meaning that it isn't a small variation of said mountain but actually the mountain itself).
Hmm, good point but I am not sure if that completely invalidates the no-mind interpretation.Because it's only after the statements reveal that grains of sand contain worlds and buddha-realms that they admit there is more than one world and worlds beyond measure.
If it was talking about this concept, it would say this world exists within itself or something along those lines not that there are literally more worlds than this one.
What's the no-mind interpretation again?Hmm, good point but I am not sure if that completely invalidates the no-mind interpretation.