This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Indeed, it may also just be that they're particularly dramatic, which we definitely have seen.
For the record: I am also in support of a week ban, but I wouldn't be upset if it was longer.
I do think it's important to consider their intentions too.
It may be that they're only here to troll us, and their comments offsite suggest that may be the case.
Anyway, LifeRiderthe1 has made it clear that their behavior is only going to get worse and that they have no respect for our rules or the people in our community.
I would support not just a warning now, but an outright ban.
I was replying to other posts from random people which have been deleted, apologies.
Though I do not think it will be productive for you to continue arguing either.
I usually lean towards leniency when a thread gets a little heated, but some of these messages are directly insulting and dehumanizing you as a person, which I think is definitely crossing the line.
I would support an official warning, or more if they already have one.
I'll wait for input from...
Well, I went to their actual profile page, where it was considerably more cropped. My apologies, I did not know it was shown differently when hovering over their name.
The exaggerated detail on the buttocks of each character in the full image is indeed very sexual in nature.
That said:
I...
It should be noted as an ability on Torchwood's profile instead:
Limited Power Bestowal (Can grant peashooters flaming projectiles which deal double damage).
I wanted to say Statistics Amplification, which usually deals with temporary multipliers like that, but the wording of the page only...
Also:
This is not exactly helpful on its own, and approving it wouldn't do anything immediately.
What specific scans would you suggest? Could you provide links?
Oh. I actually have no issue with that one.
The way it's cropped shows effectively very little, and it seems framed as merely a night on the town rather than anything directly sexual.
Regardless, I was more mentioning it to help highlight how images could be analyzed for whether or not they're...
I agree with most of this, but agree with PonePoster that Incorporeality should remain.
This is what the page states, and Discord matches this description.
As elaborated on in Discordant Harmony, Discord is a spirit which embodies and is made of pure chaos.
So much so that if he will literally...
If rules are made stricter in this regard, we should not use an objective metric such as how much skin is showing.
Twitch historically has been trying to do that, and it categorically fails every time because when the letter of the law is that specific people can easily bypass it in whatever...
I'm not familiar with the verse, so I can't fully attest to the accuracy, but on the surface the draft appears far more complete and cited than the original, so on that basis I think it seems like a massive improvement.
I have already been doing this when it popped up.
If there's a post I'm really unsure about, I tend to leave it for someone else.
I have yet to see trolling, but I have denied messages which seemed like confused spamming, in which case I'll often message that person to clarify and remind them...
I don't really understand the perspective that we can't index them because their existence is disrespectful.
They already do exist. They are published works.
Us indexing them or not does not change the fact that they were published and exist.
I don't think us ignoring their existence actually...
Thank you for understanding, and I believe I see now where the confusion comes from.
Oftentimes, a debate ends up going in circles, or two people simply fundamentally disagree on something and are unable to compromise.
In this scenario, I don't think there's anything wrong with deciding to...
I actually didn't know that. I didn't play competitively like usual in this generation, so my knowledge is mostly from PokeDoku and the show.
My assumption was that it made moves other than stellar moves neutral.
Let me modify then:
Shadow moves should still not do double damage to Terapagos...
I concur with Antvasima.
Deliberate stonewalling would be an offense, as it would be an intentional attempt to disrupt or hinder the discussion, rather than an attempt to participate in it. In general, deliberately hindering important functions of this forum is something worth reporting.
The...
I don't have much to say about the accuracy right now, since I'm not actually knowledgeable about this verse.
However, in the meantime: I would like to thank you for making this. The canon of this series confused the **** out of me, and completely turned me away from a CRT about it.
I believe that following the input you've received, and assumed that is all now changed- that this is perfectly fine.
This should be fine to be added now.
I do not see any insults in the linked messages.
The only thing remotely close is calling your argument headcanon, but the implication there is merely that they don't believe your interpretation is correct, not any sort of personal insult. In addition, I do not see stonewalling, but a genuine...
Indeed.
Whether good at it or not, they do seem to be making a genuine effort to argue their point and question the opposition.
Being wrong is not a rule violation.
I've only vaguely skimmed this thread, since it's kind of long- but based on the op:
I think it's perfectly fine to index fiction even if its cosmology happens to be similar to real religions.
Basing one's cosmology off an existing religion is an immensely popular and common trope, and so I...
I don't have a significant problem with any of this, and especially agree with the ghost type immunity to trapping being expanded upon.
Shadow and tera type interacting is sort of hard to determine. Terapagos can resist all normal types, but shadow type isn't exactly a normal type so
I think it...
Probably, but it's more indirect, so it's harder for me to say with certainty where exactly it places them.
In short, "disrupting the balance" is a bit vague, and might not require the full 2-C power.
It sounds more like triggering a chain reaction.
It's still a 2-C feat, by nature, which is...