This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
As I said and clover brought up, this is a standards thing. This back and forth and crusade has become insanely boorish and needless as seen with every single thread made so far. If kratos being capable of killing x enemy with x immortality can't be accepted by opposition then there should some...
Again just ignoring the fact kratos can kill them instantly, as proven by a multitude of gifs I have sent that have not been debunked (and can't be). The issue was never about the length of time or the manner in which kratos kills them, because at the end of the day he is still negating their...
Question for you, why are you ignoring that kratos instantly kills them when he wants to? GoS cursed remains are definitely a more troublesome enemy than they are in GoW 2 (later game chronologically) and kratos struggles against them more, but kratos still can kill them instantly and inevitably...
Are my gifs just being ignored?
Yes
> The enemy is shattered into pieces.
Yes, no different than the feats of them breaking and down regenerating themselves, except when kratos does it they instantly die.
> The enemy regenerates after a few seconds.
No. This is where the misinformation begins...
What is the argument here? That kratos needs to one shot enemies? I showcased them reassembling in the same gif. "Damage threshold" would equate to kratos solely needing to vaporize them or completely grind all of their bones to dust to be above their showcases, which he doesn't do at all. He...
Have you.... seen their applications in game by chance? They have no midsection, they're legit bones. And they can disassemble and reassemble their entire skeletal bodies at will.
It's not limited in any sense. Even in GoW 2, the only way they will disassemble and reassemble (a showcase of their immortality) is if kratos stands there and purposefully doesn't kill them. Kratos has 0 issue killing cursed remains in GoW 2, and it isn't about doing doing so much damage their...
?
What do you mean? Kratos just kills them in God of War 2. He doesn't need some roundabout way to sever their immortality I don't know where this idea came from.
It's from a guidebook statement that a sip from the styx will instantly kill someone. Seen the argument many times, whether you take the guidebook statement seriously or not kratos would naturally end up engulfing some of the water from the height he fell.
Which is the only argument used in OP, not his ability for knowing her being able to use the old magic or not. Again, kratos never said she could or couldn't reanimate with the old magic, mimir said it would require someone who knows the old magic to reanimate him, and kratos says that freya...
Eh, a characters who's entire shtick is reading peoples intentions and minds mentions kratos' head being empty after being beaten by him is coincidentally an insult? And no, heimdall never is capable of dodging kratos ever again after being pinned against the wall. And to play off unknowns...
Responding to this part specifically because it's assumptive and didn't even speak upon the entire context of what's going on.
This is a strawman, the argument wasn't about the specific showcase that was used with the old magic, the entire argument was kratos knowing she could use the old...
Rdr1's deadeye is leaps and bounds superior to 2's. Hard to get anything conclusive out of that though. There are some things of note tho, rdr2's second form of deadeye is actually the first form of deadeye john unlocks in 1. And john trained under Landon too.
I'd say gameplay mech thing at...
Im of the belief that deadeye is really just busted perception manip and not time manip so I can't really speak much on the resistance part. As a gameplay mechanic rdr2's deadeye is kinda meh, arthur is as slow as everyone else and takes forever to shoot while in it. Comparing it to RDR1's...
Never change max payne fandom.
Quite literally there couldn't be a worse fate.
Can you click on the link? It won't embed but should take you to imgur to watch it.
Yes but it's extremely on the nose backed by the actor interview on the matter. Max is constantly on drugs and alcohol, and constantly plagued by hallucinogenic visions. Max is drugged out 95% of the time, it's a very in character thing. Most 4WA things are rather one off or off the cuff...