• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Ultima_Reality
Reaction score
15,872

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Hey there Ultima. I have a question regarding ontological transcendence. So, to ontologically transcend something (Low 1-A to 1-A, 1-A to High 1-A), one must work in a different, ontologically superior framework right? So my question is this :

    If character B "transcend" character A who is 1-A, with the context behind "transcend" here is proved to be :
    1. Exist in a different framework
    2. Superior to character A's framework

    That would make character B High 1-A, right?

    If yes, wouldn't that mean the act of "transcend" here be the same as ontological transcendence?
    I know your a super busy man ultima but I was wondering if you could just for a few minutes take a look at this dale cooper match?


    You are one of the few twin peaks members so please

    Thanks
    check dis out

    Hello there Ultima. I want to make a revision on God of War but it's really controversial, so I'd need staff support or else it'll instantly get shot down and closed. Could you hear me out? You even said you'd give input on it before.
    TyphonEX
    TyphonEX
    It already got closed by a few staff members before more staff could evaluate it so I'll need staff support before I can open up a new one.
    I have a question for you ultima where would a realm nothingness that transcendces time , space and exist outside of reality , all self disappears and dreams could not be dreamed . This realm also predates and will out last reality as it simple is eternal and creation/ reality even if they are destroyed this realm will still exist scale ?(theirs a lot more info but this is the basics)
    Can we continue with this thread? We are now at a stalemate.
    Hey Ultima, as per your request, we've created a more detailed explanation of the authorities in Lord of the Mysteries. We added a dedicated page for authorities and linked both the Klein and Amon profiles to it.
    Hi Ultima, can I ask you a question about HDM. If a character is able to separate a certain thing (such as the universe) from the Higher-D level, does this give it HDM since being separating this thing from the highest level in the existing.
    Hello Ultima
    I would like to ask you a few questions regarding Umineko, specifically the Creator, could you add me on discord?
    My id : astral___trinity
    We’ve added the changes from the Lord of the Mysteries CRT into the profiles, and I believe the thread is now ready to be closed.

    I have a question here, I think it might be a good thing for the Supernatural characters (Chuck, Amara, Jack and the void).

    The void, as stated in the series is a non-physical place where The Angels and demons go when they die. This space lacks time or space, as those aspects are unique to Chuck's narrative and he cannot affect the void.

    It is a place where reality in its entirety is just inserted. And according to the new BDE features, this may qualify for 1-A. Plus there is more evidence I can gather to avoid the anti-doings of your avatars.

    What do you think? This is just a raw thing, if you think it may come to work I can gather enough evidence from the series. Even if you are not convinced now, if you have a little doubt whether it is "yes" or a "no" I will try to bring the necessary evidence in a future thread.
    Hello there Ultima. You seem to be an expert in Tier 1 revisions. A while ago, I think you said you'd look over this God of War downgrade thread that I made, but it was closed before that could happen. Now, I do want to reopen it, but it would be helpful to get staff support so that my thread doesn't get immediately get shut down again.

    Anyways, the arguments here essentially boil down to me saying that none of the "evidence" brought up is sufficient to demonstrate that God of War has 5D cosmology let alone 5D in a substantial enough manner to warrant Low 1-C. Basically, the situation is that God of War's cosmology has multiple realms that exist separate from each other that are unable to be traveled between save for special methods such as portals. The linked post is basically the only one that all the rejections are based off of. There's also this but the argument isn't coherent at all and it's just a bunch of non-sequiturs. Anyways, these facts of the cosmology are taken as meaning that these realms are parallel and thus embedded in higher dimensional space. The issue is that these realms are finite and are never even said to be universes. The most we know of their size is that they contain galaxies, but that's obviously not enough to warrant infinite size. Note how even in the cosmology page, there is no evidence of the Nine Realms being universal (which is infinite by our standards unless space is curved or cut off) in size. Only ungrounded statements and extrapolations. And of course, finite dimensions can exist within a larger space of the same dimensionality while neither intersecting nor having to be parallel, so they don't have to be embedded in higher-dimensional space. And the reason why realm travel is generally limited to special methods is not because of some sort of parallelism, but because Odin sealed off travel between realms. That's it.

    Another problem is that even if we assume it is 5D, there is no proof that it is fully-sized. Thus, the proof for Low 1-C is insufficient, since there is no proof that its 5D volume is any more than just 0. Even if we assume they're parallel and embedded in 5D space, that's not enough for 5D. You can look through the entire thread and even the previous ones or the cosmology page and there's no proof of sufficient extension in the 5th dimensional axis to justify Low 1-C. The closest they get to this is Planck claiming that the branches of the Yggdrasil extend infinitely in 5D space, therefore they must extend substantially along the 5th axis which is obviously a non-sequitur. It has already been pointed out that this is flawed logic as even a 4D object can extend infinitely in 5D space, that does not make it Low 1-C.

    Would you be willing to open the thread? Maybe support my side if you're convinced?
    Hey Ultima,
    Could we possibly get a final decision on the Lord of the Mysteries CRT now that we have four staff approvals? The thread is starting to become cluttered, with some comments revisiting topics that have already been discussed, likely due to new participants not reading through everything.

    Based on your input, would you agree to the following AP:
    • Original Creator: 1-A
    • Pillars: 1-A (Given weakened Celestial Worthy's ability to influence the Astral World and God Almighty being its ruler)
    • Great Old Ones: 1-A, Low 1-A, or Low 1-C? (These entities are stronger than Gods but aren't classified as Pillars)
    • True Gods / Sequence 0: Low 1-A or Low 1-C? (Considering their dominion over everything derived from these essences, do you think Low 1-A is more fitting?)
    I believe we can move forward with whatever you decide on this.
    Hey, please I wanted to ask for permission to comment on the Tier0 thread for swirl of the root
    Hey, please I wanted to ask for permission to comment on the Tier0 thread for swirl of the root
    Please, really need your input here Ultima, there is one H1A+ thread that has not been checked


    Please, really need your input here
    Hey ya, the CRT here is 1 staff vote off of being accepted, could ya give your input?

    Hello, Ultima. I have a few questions about the both type of characters that make up the tier High 1-A+
    Regarding High 1-A+ "type one" characters(the ones who can affect all possibilities but don't embody them):
    1. Given that they can affect all possibilities, are they all equal in terms of raw power?
    2. Can a character reach this tier despite only being capable of destroy possibilities?

    Regarding "type two"(The ones who embody all possibilities):
    1. Can there only be one per verse simmilarly to tier 0, or can there be more characters that collectively make up the framework of existence? Like the abstracts of Marvel but on an absolute scale.
    2. The concept of Mahapralaya reach this tier and type if despicted correctly? It is not the totatility of existence, but it can dissolve it.
    3. Characters who are the vehicle for a tier 0 to create all possibilities, like Azathoth to the supreme archetype, are this type of High 1-A by virtue of having created everything even if they don't embody those possibilities, or are they restricted to type one?

    Thanks in advance.
    Hello, thanks for answering my question in that thread. I just wanted to know one more thing.
    If Wuji and Taiji are the real geniuen things in verse(apparently Wuji and Taiji are both High 1-A+) and If concepts in verse can be destroyed in a specific area, would Wuji and Taiji still be High 1-A+ or would they not?
    Hey Ultima, I noticed that a lot of CRTs use Characters being "aspects of the Tier 0" as justification for High 1-A+ and I was wondering
    1. Why is this the case?
    2. Wouldn't a Tier 0 having several different aspects contradict the idea of Divine Simplicity?
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    Depends on what's meant by "aspect." In principle High 1-A+ would be obtained out of that in virtue of the character being the "medium" for everything the Tier 0 can produce (e.g. The Tier 0 is the dreamer and the High 1-A+ is the dream itself).

    A multiplicity of aspects would really only contradict the principle of the tier if it introduced multiplicity in essence to the "interiority" of the Tier 0 itself. If the aspects in question are separate from and below the undifferentiated super-essence, that's fine.
    Hi Ultima, about Tier 0

    Someone asked me if the following would be an applicable tier 0. Note that this is not a specific verse, but rather a philosophy. But just curious if this kind of thing would be a tier 0.
    God is also said to be a simple substance (§47) but it is the only one necessary (§§38–9) and without a body attached (§72). Monads perceive others "with varying degrees of clarity, except for God, who perceives all monads with utter clarity". God could take any and all perspectives, knowing of both potentiality and actuality. As well as that God in all his power would know the universe from each of the infinite perspectives at the same time, and so his perspectives—his thoughts—"simply are monads". Creation is a permanent state, thus "[monads] are generated, so to speak, by continual fulgurations of the Divinity" (§47). Any perfection comes from being created while imperfection is a limitation of nature (§42). The monads are unaffected by each other, but each have a unique way of expressing themselves in the universe, in accordance with God's infinite will.
    Leibniz uses his theory of Monads to support his argument that we live in the best of all possible worlds. He uses his basis of perception but not interaction among monads to explain that all monads must draw their essence from one ultimate monad. He then claims that this ultimate monad would be God because a monad is a “simple substance” and God is simplest of all substances, He cannot be broken down any further. This means that all monads perceive “with varying degrees of perception, except for God, who perceives all monads with utter clarity”. This superior perception of God then would apply in much the same way that he says a dominant monad controls our soul, all other monads associated with it would, essentially, shade themselves towards Him. With all monads being created by the ultimate monad and shading themselves in the image of this ultimate monad, he argues that it would be impossible to conceive of a more perfect world because all things in the world are created by and imitating the best possible monad.
    Leibniz indicates that a world is a set of compossible things, however, that a world is a kind of collection of things that God could bring into existence. For not even God can bring into existence a world in which there is some contradiction among its members or their properties.

    When Leibniz speaks of a possible world, he means a set of compossible, finite things that God could have brought into existence if he were not constrained by the goodness that is part of his nature. The actual world, on the other hand, is simply that set of finite things that is instantiated by God, because it is greatest in goodness, reality and perfection. Naturally, the fact that we are here experiencing this world—the actual world—means that there is at least one possible world. In Leibniz's view, there are an infinite number of possible worlds
    .
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    I'm not that knowledgeable on Leibniz' Monadology, so I can't really say for certain.

    Granted, if this stuff was verbatim copy-pasted into a verse, I wouldn't give Tier 0 to it at all, no. The fact he also makes God into just "the greatest/simplest monad" further hampers thing too, I'd say.
    Astral_Trinity439
    Astral_Trinity439
    I see
    And no, it wasn't. The verse in question just seemed to have links to certain parts of Pre-established harmony.
    About H1A and H1A+

    Lets say there are a 1A or low 1A concept. And there was the logic literally logic, and this logic was the most fundamental thing, more fundamental and even formed all of those concept and the rest of all of creation

    There are something that can rewrite this very logic of universe. Make impossible thing possible

    Are this can be H1A or H1A+? Because i read to qualify for H1A+ you must above/encompasses all possible logic/possible world
    Hi ultima is this enough for high 1A.
    There is 2 higher dimensions the quality between them is qualitative superiority and then there this platonic like place that is said to truly surpass higher dimensions operating in a different higher hierarchy to begin with.
    Hi Ultima. Can High 1-A+ (first or second type) characters be stronger than each other even though they are the same type? As long as it's not character A considering character B as fiction or something like that
    Rabbit2002
    Rabbit2002
    That's not necessary, I'm just curious about Wod's tier. Since I'm not sure if Top Tier (of course not counting God Tier like IATIA) like Triat, Bodnye, Gaia, Buddha... is enough to meet High 1-A+ or simply High 1-A
    Ultima_Reality
    Ultima_Reality
    Good question: I have no idea, really.
    Rabbit2002
    Rabbit2002
    Well, as I expected. Another question: is the description/scan below enough for High 1-A+? If so, what type?
    So, when a being obtains all the data stored within the Initial Flame, essentially memorizing all information, they reach the requirements needed to gain Omniscience & Omnipotence. To them, the difference between infinity and finite is a change of prefix, and they can modify the world like an author of a book. They have transcended all concepts and causality, including the absolutes of probabilities.
    The River of Existence was the current source of Fattrovi's power. It was a strength from divinity, linked to the Source of the Multiverse, infinite energies and information. There, data of any possibility existing in the past or the future of the Multiverse were stored, and obtaining it was equal to omniscience and omnipotence, granting one rule over the Multiverse.
    All information was grasped by a certain existence, and the conditions of omniscience andomnipotence were met.
    If there was a person or a being that could freely manipulate and modify that information, therewas no doubt that he could call himself the most powerful. To him, infinite energy and no energywas nothing more than a minor difference of changing the prefix to 'infinite', and when hereached that step, he could modify the world as he wished, just like the author of a book.
    Transcending all causality and concepts, even the absolutes of probabilities.
    They have also transcended the Multiverse and surpassed their limits, becoming refined Multiverses in their own right. This is the Realm of True Infinity, which is truly endless and boundless, surpassing incomplete logic and infinite limits, including the limit of endless ascension. Omnipotence awakened the greatest, strongest, and most inconceivable power. It is completely illogical and indescribable, and any thought about it is wrong, and any retort against it is moot.
    Those were immeasurably powerful beings which surpassed their own limits and transcended the Multiverse itself-in fact,they were refined Multiverses in their own right.
    The so-called ultimate was to surpass these seemingly infinite limits and achieve omniscience and omnipotence. It was a realm that was truly endless, boundless, and boundless. It was to surpass incomplete logic and prove the true infinity.
    [Endless ascension was in itself a limit]
    Omnipotence awakened. An omnipotence that could not possibly exist. When all the harsh conditions were met, theOmnipotence awakened in an instant that could not be measured by time.
    Omnipotencewas the greatest, strongest, and most inconceivable power.
    Last but not least, indescribable and illogical 'Omnipotence and Omniscience': any thought was mistaken, any retort moot.

    Also... don't you think that Jack Nance from Ereaserhead is cosplaying Emil Cioran?
    BleedingPeach
    BleedingPeach
    Thank you, Ultima. In my eyes you're a demigod, not a god because "god" doesn't exists... I think.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top